PFD report

Kristina CROSS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Jan 2018•Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Delays in reporting plain radiology within required timescales
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted uponPart of recurring concern: Unreliable timeliness of radiology imaging and reporting
  2. Failure to report non-urgent plain radiology unless specifically requested
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable radiology processes for communicating findings and initiating required follow-upPart of recurring concern: Unreliable timeliness of radiology imaging and reporting
  3. Unfilled consultant radiologist posts
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in reporting plain radiology within required timescales

Wider context from the report

“Evidence from the Lead Consultant Radiologist of the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust was that whilst there was an initial misdiagnosis of the hip fracture there was a subsequent significant delay in reporting on plain radiology, due to a shortage of Consultant Radiologists. Furthermore evidence was heard that non-urgent plain radiology is not being reported at all unless specifically requested by clinicians. Evidence was heard that a quarter of positions within the Trust are currently unfilled. The Dalton Review of July 2014 identified that such is a national position, with comparatively low levels of radiologist training and retention with 41% of unfilled consultant radiological posts remaining unfilled for more than 12 months. In brief the concerns arising from the evidence are that a substantial number of consultant posts are unfilled, and that due to shortages of qualified radiologists, radiological investigations, crucial for diagnostic and clinical decision making purposes, are not reported on within the timescales set out within Professor Sir Bruce Keogh's report of 2013, or at all. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon; Unreliable timeliness of radiology imaging and reporting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to report non-urgent plain radiology unless specifically requested

Wider context from the report

“Evidence from the Lead Consultant Radiologist of the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust was that whilst there was an initial misdiagnosis of the hip fracture there was a subsequent significant delay in reporting on plain radiology, due to a shortage of Consultant Radiologists. Furthermore evidence was heard that non-urgent plain radiology is not being reported at all unless specifically requested by clinicians. Evidence was heard that a quarter of positions within the Trust are currently unfilled. The Dalton Review of July 2014 identified that such is a national position, with comparatively low levels of radiologist training and retention with 41% of unfilled consultant radiological posts remaining unfilled for more than 12 months. In brief the concerns arising from the evidence are that a substantial number of consultant posts are unfilled, and that due to shortages of qualified radiologists, radiological investigations, crucial for diagnostic and clinical decision making purposes, are not reported on within the timescales set out within Professor Sir Bruce Keogh's report of 2013, or at all. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable radiology processes for communicating findings and initiating required follow-up; Unreliable timeliness of radiology imaging and reporting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unfilled consultant radiologist posts

Wider context from the report

“Evidence from the Lead Consultant Radiologist of the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust was that whilst there was an initial misdiagnosis of the hip fracture there was a subsequent significant delay in reporting on plain radiology, due to a shortage of Consultant Radiologists. Furthermore evidence was heard that non-urgent plain radiology is not being reported at all unless specifically requested by clinicians. Evidence was heard that a quarter of positions within the Trust are currently unfilled. The Dalton Review of July 2014 identified that such is a national position, with comparatively low levels of radiologist training and retention with 41% of unfilled consultant radiological posts remaining unfilled for more than 12 months. In brief the concerns arising from the evidence are that a substantial number of consultant posts are unfilled, and that due to shortages of qualified radiologists, radiological investigations, crucial for diagnostic and clinical decision making purposes, are not reported on within the timescales set out within Professor Sir Bruce Keogh's report of 2013, or at all. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.