Pamela Gressman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 1 Aug 2016•County Durham and Darlington

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to consider physical effects of ingested foreign bodies and their link to abdominal pain
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate management of foreign-body ingestion risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable treatment and observation of ingested foreign bodies
  2. Absence of a clear treatment and observation plan for ingested foreign bodies
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable treatment and observation of ingested foreign bodies

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Recruit a Physical Health Practitioner for the West Park site to provide additional ward-team support and expertise.

  2. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Review the observation and engagement procedure to consider enhanced observations after foreign-object ingestion.

  3. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Develop an SBARD notification document for Trust-wide staff to improve patient safety and reduce recurrence risk.

  4. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Share investigation and inquest findings with ward multidisciplinary teams and across the Trust.

  5. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Work with the local Emergency Department to design and share standard work requiring thorax and abdominal X-rays in relevant cases.

  6. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Hold case discussions and share incident lessons with inpatient Consultant Psychiatrists and Modern Matrons.

  7. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Deliver formal training on delayed physical effects, stool checks, risk and intervention plans, and recording related observations.

  8. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Share lessons learned across other inpatient areas to reduce the risk of similar issues elsewhere.

  9. Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust

    Deliver clinical supervision and training reinforcing Early Warning Signs and physical-health monitoring, including prompt medical escalation.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider physical effects of ingested foreign bodies and their link to abdominal pain

Wider context from the report

“Whilst it is clear that considerable attention was given to the deceased’s mental health, insufficient consideration or no consideration was given to any physical effects which might ensue from her ingesting the foreign bodies that she reported she had and which led to her period of hospitalisation. Thus little or no thought was given to any link between such items and her presentation with abdominal pain in January 2016. The absence of a clear treatment and observation plan in such circumstances could lead to a risk of similar fatalities in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of foreign-body ingestion risks; Unreliable treatment and observation of ingested foreign bodies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a clear treatment and observation plan for ingested foreign bodies

Wider context from the report

“Whilst it is clear that considerable attention was given to the deceased’s mental health, insufficient consideration or no consideration was given to any physical effects which might ensue from her ingesting the foreign bodies that she reported she had and which led to her period of hospitalisation. Thus little or no thought was given to any link between such items and her presentation with abdominal pain in January 2016. The absence of a clear treatment and observation plan in such circumstances could lead to a risk of similar fatalities in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable treatment and observation of ingested foreign bodies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recruit a Physical Health Practitioner for the West Park site to provide additional ward-team support and expertise.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Recruitment of a Physical Health Practitioner for the West Park site to provide additional support, skill and expertise to ward teams. Recruitment to commence September 2016.”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the observation and engagement procedure to consider enhanced observations after foreign-object ingestion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A review of the observation and engagement procedure will include consideration of a period of enhanced observations for a period of time following ingestion of a foreign object to enable close monitoring of any physical side effects but also to monitor if any foreign bodies are passed through stools. Completed”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an SBARD notification document for Trust-wide staff to improve patient safety and reduce recurrence risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• An SBARD (notification document) has been developed for all staff Trustwide in relation to improving patient safety and minimising the risk of a repeat incident. Completed.”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share investigation and inquest findings with ward multidisciplinary teams and across the Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The findings and lessons learned from the internal investigation and inquest have been shared in detail with the ward multidisciplinary team, which continue through a variety of means across the Trust. To be completed 30th September 2016”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with the local Emergency Department to design and share standard work requiring thorax and abdominal X-rays in relevant cases.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Liaison colleagues to work with the local Emergency Department to ensure standard work is designed and shared to ensure X-rays are done of thorax and abdomen in such instances. To be completed by 31st October 2016.”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold case discussions and share incident lessons with inpatient Consultant Psychiatrists and Modern Matrons.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Further case discussion and lessons learned from the incident is being held with all inpatient Consultant Psychiatrists and Modern Matrons. To be completed 31st October 2016.”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver formal training on delayed physical effects, stool checks, risk and intervention plans, and recording related observations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Formal training sessions to be delivered to specifically include: ◦ Consideration of the possibility of physical effects (sometimes delayed for days) following swallowing of foreign objects, in particular for patients with known history of this ◦ Clarification of process to check if foreign bodies have been passed in stools by patient ◦ The requirement to have a risk management plan and intervention plan to monitor and manage physical health care symptoms of concern and the need to record related observations (10 case notes to be audited). To be completed 31st October 2016 (delayed due to the challenges of delivering training during the holiday period).”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share lessons learned across other inpatient areas to reduce the risk of similar issues elsewhere.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Directorate Quality Assurance Group will also ensure that the lessons learnt are shared across other inpatient areas so they can assure us that similar issues should not occur elsewhere. The Trust has corporate processes to both monitor completion”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver clinical supervision and training reinforcing Early Warning Signs and physical-health monitoring, including prompt medical escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Additional training requirements identified for staff around the use of the Early Warning Signs (EWS) process in particular. Individual clinical supervision sessions are taking place to reinforce EWS and physical health monitoring processes with the ward staff, including that staff must not just record any deterioration but take action on this through seeking prompt medical advice. Completed”

Source location

2016-0279-Response-by-Tees-Esk-amd-Water-Valleys-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 1 August 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026