PFD report

Jason Paul DEVOTI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 Jan 2020•Worcestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
18

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to resource and attend P2 incidents within 60 minutes during increased demand
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police incident dispatch and response under service demand
  2. Failure to provide sufficient and appropriate control-room training for escalation and increased demand
  3. Failure to deal with P2 incident logs within the required time
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police incident dispatch and response under service demand
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.17

  1. Action

    Establish THRIVE, integrated with the National Decision Model, as agreed policy for incident-risk assessment and decision-making.

    Stated by West Midlands PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 February 2020.
  2. Action

    Implement a Log Closure Doctrine to support dispatcher decision-making and focus resources on calls requiring greatest need.

    Stated by West Midlands PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 February 2020.
  3. Action

    Implement a control-room shift pattern aligned with contact-handling colleagues to improve understanding and joint training opportunities.

    Stated by West Midlands PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 February 2020.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Resource constraints limit the ability to respond to emergency calls within an appropriate time, despite prioritisation and efficient allocation of available resources.

    Stated by West Midlands PoliceUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to resource and attend P2 incidents within 60 minutes during increased demand

Wider context from the report

“(5) I am concerned at how overwhelmed those working in the Bournville control room had been by the increased demand on resources, and how their views about any improvement in the situation in the months following Jason's death did not appear to match what I was told by ████████ I was also concerned about the lack of awareness of and implementation of whatever escalation process may have been in place in the control room at the time of these events; this suggests a lack of appropriate training. Whilst I understand that the West Midlands force is undergoing a period of transition so far as their control rooms are concerned, I am not satisfied that measures to have yet been put in place to ensure that all those working in control rooms have received sufficient and appropriate training to deal with situations of increased demand. (6) I therefore remain concerned that in times of increased demand, and particularly unanticipated demand, there is a risk that West Midlands Police will be unable to resource and attend a P2 incident within the 60 minute period that is their stated aim, and that in turn will create a risk of death of the subject of such a P2 incident, if vulnerable and at some risk of harm as Jason Devoti undoubtedly was. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police incident dispatch and response under service demand.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide sufficient and appropriate control-room training for escalation and increased demand

Wider context from the report

“(5) I am concerned at how overwhelmed those working in the Bournville control room had been by the increased demand on resources, and how their views about any improvement in the situation in the months following Jason's death did not appear to match what I was told by ████████ I was also concerned about the lack of awareness of and implementation of whatever escalation process may have been in place in the control room at the time of these events; this suggests a lack of appropriate training. Whilst I understand that the West Midlands force is undergoing a period of transition so far as their control rooms are concerned, I am not satisfied that measures to have yet been put in place to ensure that all those working in control rooms have received sufficient and appropriate training to deal with situations of increased demand. (6) I therefore remain concerned that in times of increased demand, and particularly unanticipated demand, there is a risk that West Midlands Police will be unable to resource and attend a P2 incident within the 60 minute period that is their stated aim, and that in turn will create a risk of death of the subject of such a P2 incident, if vulnerable and at some risk of harm as Jason Devoti undoubtedly was. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to deal with P2 incident logs within the required time

Wider context from the report

“(2) The four police Dispatchers working in the Bournville control room gave evidence to the inquest that: (a) At the time of these events a very large number ( 150-200 ) of P2 incident logs would regularly be outstanding at the beginning of a shift; (b) That many of those logs would be "overdue" – which meant not only that they had passed the one hour deadline, but in fact that more than 6 hours had passed since the log was last looked at; (c) That those operating the terminals which would have to try to deal with these logs were overwhelmed by the number of logs they had to deal with; (d) That if there was an escalation process in force at the time, then: (i) Either dispatchers were not sufficiently aware of the process so as to be able to act in accordance with it; or (ii) They were being given the impression by supervisors that there was little point in escalating overdue logs to them, as there was little that could be done; (e) That the reason for the large number of logs being overdue was mainly because there were insufficient officers to deploy to incidents, but also because there were not enough staff in the control room to work through the logs; (f) That measures taken to reduce the number of overdue logs ( known as ████████ ) would provide only temporary respite before the number of overdue logs built up again; (g) That at various times since these events, there had been little improvement in the situation: in January 2019 the situation was "still overwhelming" ( ████████ ); in June 2019 there would always be a lot of overdue logs ( ████████ ); in October 2019 there were still too many P2 logs that were not being dealt with in time ( ████████ ); the current situation is "a little better" in that "more robust decisions are being taken by call takers", but there are still problems now, and "the crux is that we don't have enough police officers on the streets to deal with incidents" ( ████████ ). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police incident dispatch and response under service demand.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inaccurate and incomplete monitoring of open and overdue P2 incident logs

Wider context from the report

“(4) In order to try to assist with understanding the figures involved, I was provided with a number of tables designed to give a "snapshot" of current logs and available police resources at particular times, viz. 8-9 October 2018, 8 October 2019 and 7 October 2020. In my view, this provided limited assistance as (a) the column giving the total of logs open appeared to be incorrect as it did not tally with the figures within other columns, and (b) it was not possible to see how many of the open logs were overdue, and in particular how many of the P2 logs had passed the critical one hour mark without a response. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police incident dispatch and response under service demand.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient control-room staff to process P2 incident logs

Wider context from the report

“(2) The four police Dispatchers working in the Bournville control room gave evidence to the inquest that: (a) At the time of these events a very large number ( 150-200 ) of P2 incident logs would regularly be outstanding at the beginning of a shift; (b) That many of those logs would be "overdue" – which meant not only that they had passed the one hour deadline, but in fact that more than 6 hours had passed since the log was last looked at; (c) That those operating the terminals which would have to try to deal with these logs were overwhelmed by the number of logs they had to deal with; (d) That if there was an escalation process in force at the time, then: (i) Either dispatchers were not sufficiently aware of the process so as to be able to act in accordance with it; or (ii) They were being given the impression by supervisors that there was little point in escalating overdue logs to them, as there was little that could be done; (e) That the reason for the large number of logs being overdue was mainly because there were insufficient officers to deploy to incidents, but also because there were not enough staff in the control room to work through the logs; (f) That measures taken to reduce the number of overdue logs ( known as ████████ ) would provide only temporary respite before the number of overdue logs built up again; (g) That at various times since these events, there had been little improvement in the situation: in January 2019 the situation was "still overwhelming" ( ████████ ); in June 2019 there would always be a lot of overdue logs ( ████████ ); in October 2019 there were still too many P2 logs that were not being dealt with in time ( ████████ ); the current situation is "a little better" in that "more robust decisions are being taken by call takers", but there are still problems now, and "the crux is that we don't have enough police officers on the streets to deal with incidents" ( ████████ ). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient emergency control-room staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient police officers to resource and attend P2 incidents

Wider context from the report

“(2) The four police Dispatchers working in the Bournville control room gave evidence to the inquest that: (a) At the time of these events a very large number ( 150-200 ) of P2 incident logs would regularly be outstanding at the beginning of a shift; (b) That many of those logs would be "overdue" – which meant not only that they had passed the one hour deadline, but in fact that more than 6 hours had passed since the log was last looked at; (c) That those operating the terminals which would have to try to deal with these logs were overwhelmed by the number of logs they had to deal with; (d) That if there was an escalation process in force at the time, then: (i) Either dispatchers were not sufficiently aware of the process so as to be able to act in accordance with it; or (ii) They were being given the impression by supervisors that there was little point in escalating overdue logs to them, as there was little that could be done; (e) That the reason for the large number of logs being overdue was mainly because there were insufficient officers to deploy to incidents, but also because there were not enough staff in the control room to work through the logs; (f) That measures taken to reduce the number of overdue logs ( known as ████████ ) would provide only temporary respite before the number of overdue logs built up again; (g) That at various times since these events, there had been little improvement in the situation: in January 2019 the situation was "still overwhelming" ( ████████ ); in June 2019 there would always be a lot of overdue logs ( ████████ ); in October 2019 there were still too many P2 logs that were not being dealt with in time ( ████████ ); the current situation is "a little better" in that "more robust decisions are being taken by call takers", but there are still problems now, and "the crux is that we don't have enough police officers on the streets to deal with incidents" ( ████████ ). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police incident dispatch and response under service demand.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish THRIVE, integrated with the National Decision Model, as agreed policy for incident-risk assessment and decision-making.

Verbatim wording from the response

“11. Staff across the control rooms continue to be supported in the use of the escalation process. There are a number of processes being implemented to ensure that this is the case:”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a Log Closure Doctrine to support dispatcher decision-making and focus resources on calls requiring greatest need.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b. Instituting a “Log Closure Doctrine” to encourage bolder decision-making from dispatchers dealing with emergency calls to ensure resources are focussed on those calls requiring greatest need.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a control-room shift pattern aligned with contact-handling colleagues to improve understanding and joint training opportunities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“f. In June 2019 a new shift pattern was implemented for control rooms, this was in part due to there being no dedicated training days in the previous pattern and to align with Contact handling colleagues to improve understanding and opportunities for joint training.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Transfer incident logs between control rooms to share demand across available staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“d. Load sharing across control rooms to match demand with resource. Logs are now transferred to another control room to ensure that demand is equally managed across all staff.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refresh the escalation process, reduce decision-making rank requirements, and subject its use to regular audits and feedback.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a. Escalation process - Whilst this was in place at the time of the death of Mr Devoti, this has been refreshed with all staff and is now subject of regular audits and feedback. The ‘rank’ involved in this decision making has been reduced to make the decision process quicker and has been explained to the wider organisation.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the new Command and Control system, embedding THRIVE and improving incident, risk, and demand management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b. THRIVE is now embedded into the new Command and Control system and was delivered to all Force Contact staff as part of the training for the system ‘go live’.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Involve the Force Incident Manager during particularly busy response shifts to redeploy resources from outside the area or to another policing area.

Verbatim wording from the response

“16. Before and since the events leading up to Mr Devoti’s death, West Midlands Police has taken steps to ensure that the Response resources it has available are allocated as swiftly and efficiently as possible to all emergency calls. In addition to those measures set out above the following steps have also been taken:”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the closest available resource to support front-end incident-log demand.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b. Use of the closest available resource to support with front end log demand.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use Force Support Unit staff to manage legacy demand.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8. It was presented during the inquest that the reason for the number of outstanding incident logs was due to resourcing challenges because of austerity and the availability of officers to deploy. This has been addressed in a number of ways since the incident involving Mr DEVOTI:”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a performance analysis tool providing incident and resource-demand data at 15-minute intervals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. There is acceptance that there is still work more to do, including the introduction of a new Command and Control System and a performance analysis tool which provides incident and resource demand data at 15 minutes periods in order that this can be easily identified and responded to. This has continued to improve the position demonstrated by the snapshots presented as evidence and described at Point 4 above.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the revised dispatch model with a dedicated triage terminal, supervisory incident reviews, and 24-hour reassessment and transfer of unresolved incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b. Changes to control room model - The model that is used within dispatch is continually reviewed to ensure that it delivers the most effective approach. Changes were implemented in the summer of 2019 in order to manage incoming demand and the risk contained within existing logs. This includes the introduction of a dedicated triage terminal. This terminal does not hold legacy demand, therefore is able to review every new incident log sent to”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve contact handling by identifying lower-risk or non-policing incidents that do not require higher-priority control-room responses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“e. This has been combined with a focus within Contact handling, around the policing purpose for incidents. Historically there were incidents being created as a P2 that were lower risk and should have been graded as a P3, or where there was no policing response required. This has further reduced unnecessary demand on control rooms.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide initial control-room training, mentoring, and competence portfolios over a six-month training period.

Verbatim wording from the response

“12. The role by its very nature is one of managing competing demands, assessing risk and identifying appropriate resources to deploy against this assessment. The initial training is over a six month period involving initial training, mentoring and the completion of a portfolio for competence and capability in being able to operate in this high pressured role. To support staff in delivering against these demands, all of these systems and processes are now in place to support staff appropriately.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop process-change training for the THRIVE policy and prepare it for delivery to teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a. THRIVE, which is a tool used to gather information to assess risk incorporated with the National Decision Model (NDM), supporting decision making on how an incident should be managed. This is now an agreed policy and the process change training is being developed ready for delivery to teams.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Transfer logs more than 24 hours old to a different team so dispatchers can focus on critical calls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“c. Reducing the number of logs held by each dispatcher. Logs more than 24 hours old are now dealt with by a different team so that dispatchers can concentrate on the most critical calls without the distraction of managing older logs.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Replace the incident snapshot presentation and establish an online dashboard to support understanding of available resources.

Verbatim wording from the response

“10. In relation to point 4 of HM Coroners’ areas of concern, it is accepted that there were some issues with how the ‘snapshot’ was completed. This has been addressed and as seen during the inquest, this snapshot has been changed to simplify what is being presented and an online dashboard is now in place to support the understanding of resources.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Allocate logs unresolved at 96 hours to an appropriate Neighbourhood Policing Unit resource for ownership until finalisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“c. Support from Neighbourhood Policing Unit senior leaders to allocate logs unresolved at 96 hours to the most appropriate resource to own until finalised.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Resource constraints limit the ability to respond to emergency calls within an appropriate time, despite prioritisation and efficient allocation of available resources.

Verbatim wording from the response

“14. It is right to reflect the positive news of an uplift to police resources over the next three years, recently announced by the Government and these are welcomed. It is necessary to acknowledge the impacts of austerity through the funding formula over the last five years particularly on West Midlands Police and the challenge this has created in managing increasing demand levels.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing systems and processes are considered sufficient to support control-room staff in managing competing demands, assessing risk and deploying resources.

Verbatim wording from the response

“13. In relation to the lack of resources to deal with incidents, the introduction of the escalation process allows for the use of any resource to respond to an incident where the risk dictates. It has taken time to embed this process and we are now seeing this supporting delivery. This has become more focused during Force TRM, held three times a day, where decisions are made to move additional resources according to demand.”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Complete and maintain supervisory records of missing-person logs until resolution, including awareness during team handovers.

    Stated by West Midlands PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 February 2020.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete and maintain supervisory records of missing-person logs until resolution, including awareness during team handovers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“17. West Midlands Police takes its response to emergency calls extremely seriously. We constantly review and strive to implement new processes, systems and technology, maximising the efficiency of the control room. This allows redeployment of available resources to respond at particularly busy times. An”

Source location

2020-0017-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Redacted
Page 6 · response
Published 8 February 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026