PFD report

SOLOMON JAMES BEALEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Oct 2015•Norfolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to follow up and act on identified suicide risk
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably follow up identified mental-health safety concerns
  2. Failure to communicate receipt and outcome of safeguarding correspondence to the responsible doctor
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to act appropriately on safeguarding referrals and notices
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Develop a Mental Health Care Plan template for integration into SystmOne.

    Stated by Norwich Practices Health Centre and Walk-in CentreStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 October 2015.
  2. Action

    Review identified patients’ Mental Health Care Plans and discuss concerns at weekly clinical meetings.

    Stated by Norwich Practices Health Centre and Walk-in CentreStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 October 2015.
  3. Action

    Automatically refer suicide attempts by children under 16 to the Safeguarding Team.

    Stated by Norwich Practices Health Centre and Walk-in CentreStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 October 2015.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow up and act on identified suicide risk

Wider context from the report

“(1) Solomon was taken to see a Nurse at the Walk In Clinic on 1 October 2014 for minor medical matters. The Nurse became concerned at signs of stress and was aware that in 2010 Solomon was found preparing to hang himself, and so arranged for an on call Doctor to see him. No action was taken. The Nurse expressed her concerns to a GP in the practice. A telephone call was made to a number believed to be that of the mother of Solomon, but it was a wrong number. The Doctor wrote to Solomon's mother on two occasions and received no reply. The matter was not pursued any further. (2) Although the letters had been received by Solomon's mother who discussed this with Solomon and his father and it was decided to take no further action, the Doctor was unaware that the letters had been received. (3) No follow up action was taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably follow up identified mental-health safety concerns.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate receipt and outcome of safeguarding correspondence to the responsible doctor

Wider context from the report

“(1) Solomon was taken to see a Nurse at the Walk In Clinic on 1 October 2014 for minor medical matters. The Nurse became concerned at signs of stress and was aware that in 2010 Solomon was found preparing to hang himself, and so arranged for an on call Doctor to see him. No action was taken. The Nurse expressed her concerns to a GP in the practice. A telephone call was made to a number believed to be that of the mother of Solomon, but it was a wrong number. The Doctor wrote to Solomon's mother on two occasions and received no reply. The matter was not pursued any further. (2) Although the letters had been received by Solomon's mother who discussed this with Solomon and his father and it was decided to take no further action, the Doctor was unaware that the letters had been received. (3) No follow up action was taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to act appropriately on safeguarding referrals and notices.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a Mental Health Care Plan template for integration into SystmOne.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action – The clinical team are in the process of developing a template for a Mental Health Care Plan to be integrated onto SystmOne, our hosted clinical IT system. As a result of this review, Mental Health Care Plans already in place have been read-coded. This triggers a patient status alert which is visible under the patient demographic box and on the patient’s home screen. Patients that we have identified will have a review of their care plan before 30.11.15 and any concerns will be discussed at our weekly clinical meeting.”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review identified patients’ Mental Health Care Plans and discuss concerns at weekly clinical meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action – The clinical team are in the process of developing a template for a Mental Health Care Plan to be integrated onto SystmOne, our hosted clinical IT system. As a result of this review, Mental Health Care Plans already in place have been read-coded. This triggers a patient status alert which is visible under the patient demographic box and on the patient’s home screen. Patients that we have identified will have a review of their care plan before 30.11.15 and any concerns will be discussed at our weekly clinical meeting.”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Automatically refer suicide attempts by children under 16 to the Safeguarding Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Any suicide attempt made by a child under 16years will trigger an automatic referral to the Safeguarding Team.”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Contact significant-concern patients after mental-health discharge notices and offer GP review appointments about ongoing support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action – For patients identified as a significant concern, discharge notices from the Mental Health team will trigger contact, via telephone, from the practice to the patient to offer an appointment for GP review to discuss ongoing need for support.”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Read-code existing Mental Health Care Plans to trigger visible patient-record alerts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action – The clinical team are in the process of developing a template for a Mental Health Care Plan to be integrated onto SystmOne, our hosted clinical IT system. As a result of this review, Mental Health Care Plans already in place have been read-coded. This triggers a patient status alert which is visible under the patient demographic box and on the patient’s home screen. Patients that we have identified will have a review of their care plan before 30.11.15 and any concerns will be discussed at our weekly clinical meeting.”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and weekly review a Patients of Significant Concern register, removing patients only when concern lessens or resolves.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Action - We have a standing agenda item ‘Patients of Concern’ at our weekly clinical meeting. With immediate effect, we have agreed to have a ‘Patients of Significant Concern’ register. Patients will be added as agreed at the clinical meeting and the register will be reviewed weekly. Patients will only be removed from the list if the level of concern has lessened or resolved.”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Share and agree the learning outcomes and action plan with the whole practice team.

    Stated by Norwich Practices Health Centre and Walk-in CentreStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 October 2015.
  2. 2

    Review the implemented process after six months, in May 2016.

    Stated by Norwich Practices Health Centre and Walk-in CentreStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 8 October 2015.
  3. 3

    Review practice policies and procedures as a significant event.

    Stated by Norwich Practices Health Centre and Walk-in CentreStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 October 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share and agree the learning outcomes and action plan with the whole practice team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report and our subsequent review has been discussed with the whole team at our clinical meeting on 3rd November 2015. The above learning outcomes and action plan has been shared and agreed.”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the implemented process after six months, in May 2016.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• This process will be reviewed in 6 months’ time (May 2016)”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review practice policies and procedures as a significant event.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Learning Outcomes and Action Plan The practice has regarded this tragic death as a significant event and reviewed its policies and procedures.”

Source location

2015-0403-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 8 October 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026