PFD report

Joyce Mary Ravenhill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Aug 2016•Cheshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of an operational policy for communicating urgent doctor’s appointment needs between triage nurses
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable transfer of triage information for urgent clinical appointments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Apply a procedure requiring staff to manually record attempted but unavailable appointment bookings.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 August 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an operational policy for communicating urgent doctor’s appointment needs between triage nurses

Wider context from the report

“Although a summary of the first triage assessment on 26th December 2015 was available to the second triage nurse, there was no facility / operational policy whereby the simple fact that the deceased needed an urgent doctor’s appointment could be effectively communicated by the first triage nurse to the second, all information and communication being automatically electronically generated. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable transfer of triage information for urgent clinical appointments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply a procedure requiring staff to manually record attempted but unavailable appointment bookings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At NWAS a procedure has been applied for all staff to manually note where an appointment booking has been attempted, but found not to be possible.”

Source location

2016-0303-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 24 August 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Complete a full investigation into the incident.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 August 2016.
  2. 2

    Report the abdominal-pain and haematemesis assessment issue to the national NHS Pathways authoring team.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 August 2016.
  3. 3

    Undertake a joint root cause analysis with East Cheshire NHS Trust.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 August 2016.
  4. 4

    Report the incident through the STEIS reporting procedure.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 August 2016.
  5. 5

    Address NHS 111 staff failings through reflection and retraining, removing affected staff from duty until completion and satisfactory review.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 August 2016.
  6. 6

    Issue interim guidance to NHS 111 staff on managing abdominal pain and vomiting.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 August 2016.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The relevant referral information was available to ECT staff, contrary to the concern that it could not be clearly seen.

    Stated by North West Ambulance Service NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a full investigation into the incident.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the initial request for information in support of the Inquest, NWAS carried out an assessment of our involvement in Mrs Ravenhill’s care. In addition to the matter noted above, some further issues in the call were identified on the part of one of our clinicians in the NHS 111 service. NWAS reported the incident under its STEIS reporting procedure and carried out a full investigation.”

Source location

2016-0303-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Report the abdominal-pain and haematemesis assessment issue to the national NHS Pathways authoring team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A clinical issue relating to the management of abdominal pain and vomiting blood was subsequently identified through the investigation into a different, unrelated incident. That issue was found to be common to this investigation and as a result has been reported to the national NHS Pathways authoring team. The NHS Pathways team has recognised the issues that we identified, and have agreed to review this assessment pathway, specifically the question and answer algorithms, in order to remove any potential for confusion and incorrect use.”

Source location

2016-0303-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake a joint root cause analysis with East Cheshire NHS Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A further full joint root cause analysis exercise was undertaken between NWAS and ECT.”

Source location

2016-0303-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Report the incident through the STEIS reporting procedure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the initial request for information in support of the Inquest, NWAS carried out an assessment of our involvement in Mrs Ravenhill’s care. In addition to the matter noted above, some further issues in the call were identified on the part of one of our clinicians in the NHS 111 service. NWAS reported the incident under its STEIS reporting procedure and carried out a full investigation.”

Source location

2016-0303-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Address NHS 111 staff failings through reflection and retraining, removing affected staff from duty until completion and satisfactory review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Where the findings of both incidents related to individual staff failings in the NHS 111 service, these have been addressed through reflection and retraining, with staff removed from duty until the retraining and review were satisfactorily completed.”

Source location

2016-0303-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue interim guidance to NHS 111 staff on managing abdominal pain and vomiting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Guidance has been issued to NWAS NHS 111 staff in the management of abdominal pain and vomiting, as an interim measure pending any national NHS Pathways redesign.”

Source location

2016-0303-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 August 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The relevant referral information was available to ECT staff, contrary to the concern that it could not be clearly seen.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the inquest you remarked that this inability to clearly see that the call was a ‘contact’ call rather than a ‘speak to’ call led the ECT clinician to perform this reassessment rather than simply offering a face to face appointment. Whilst NWAS would contend that the information was in fact available, we accept that further steps needed be taken to make the information clearer.”

Source location

2016-0303-Response-by-North-West-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 24 August 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026