PFD report

Amanda DUNN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Jul 2021•Staffordshire South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to take reported harassment incidents sufficiently seriously
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Review repeat anti-social behaviour cases involving vulnerable people to identify cases requiring additional work.

    Stated by Staffordshire PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 August 2021.
  2. Action

    Share learning about failures to investigate and record allegations with neighbourhood policing, anti-social behaviour leads and relevant local officers.

    Stated by Staffordshire PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 August 2021.
  3. Action

    Disseminate learning from the case to help prevent recurrence.

    Stated by Staffordshire PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 August 2021.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to take reported harassment incidents sufficiently seriously

Wider context from the report

“Family members told me that for a period of about two years prior to her death Amanda had received a lot of aggravation from a set of neighbours. Police were contacted several times but took no action. The evidence I heard clearly seemed to amount to harassment. Prior to the inquest I was not aware of the full extent of the concerns and had not requested evidence from the police on this (PC ████████ gave evidence about the circumstances of the death itself). I realise therefore that I have only heard one side of the story but there is a real concern that police are seeking to brush such incidents under the carpet and not taking them sufficiently seriously. Clearly, I do not want another death reported to me of a similar nature. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review repeat anti-social behaviour cases involving vulnerable people to identify cases requiring additional work.

Verbatim wording from the response

“More broadly, the Force is reviewing whether there are any similar repeat cases of anti-social behaviour which have been reported to Staffordshire Police that involve vulnerable people. The aim of this work is to identify any cases that have been reported to Staffordshire Police which need additional work, in response to these findings. The second aim is to examine our systems and processes to ensure we provide a consistently good level of service to those people who report matters of anti-social behaviour.”

Source location

2021-0261-Response-from-Staffordshire-Police_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning about failures to investigate and record allegations with neighbourhood policing, anti-social behaviour leads and relevant local officers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the police did not respond effectively to the allegation of a criminal offence (the pushing incident). We have found no material where the police have confirmed, recorded or explored this allegation. This learning has been promptly shared with colleagues who are responsible for neighbourhood policing, the thematic business lead for anti-social behaviour as well as the specific officers responsible for the area in which Mrs. Dunn lived.”

Source location

2021-0261-Response-from-Staffordshire-Police_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate learning from the case to help prevent recurrence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I want to reassure you that we take this matter very seriously and are committed to ensuring that the learning from this case is captured, understood and disseminated in a way that prevents future re-occurrences.”

Source location

2021-0261-Response-from-Staffordshire-Police_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Examine systems and processes to improve consistency of service for people reporting anti-social behaviour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“More broadly, the Force is reviewing whether there are any similar repeat cases of anti-social behaviour which have been reported to Staffordshire Police that involve vulnerable people. The aim of this work is to identify any cases that have been reported to Staffordshire Police which need additional work, in response to these findings. The second aim is to examine our systems and processes to ensure we provide a consistently good level of service to those people who report matters of anti-social behaviour.”

Source location

2021-0261-Response-from-Staffordshire-Police_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Assess partner information to identify learning opportunities from the case.

    Stated by Staffordshire PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 August 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess partner information to identify learning opportunities from the case.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Finally, the police are keen to understand if further information was known by partner agencies and if broader partnership learning can be achieved through wider understanding of this case. Consequently we have written to colleagues within the Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Adult Safeguarding Partnership Board.”

Source location

2021-0261-Response-from-Staffordshire-Police_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 3 August 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026