Ivan Merryfield O’Neill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Dec 2020•East London

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Limited physiological reserve increasing risk of rapid loss of consciousness following bleeding
  2. Restlessness during dialysis increasing risk of needle dislodgement
  3. Failure of dialysis equipment alarms to promptly alert staff to bleeding
No response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is included in the published responses for this report.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited physiological reserve increasing risk of rapid loss of consciousness following bleeding

Wider context from the report

“2. Mr O’Neill was a frail patient with little reserve and would be more likely to swiftly lose consciousness following a bleed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Restlessness during dialysis increasing risk of needle dislodgement

Wider context from the report

“1. Mr O’Neill was known to be a restless patient during a dialysis session. This factor must have increased the risk of needle dislodgement. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of dialysis equipment alarms to promptly alert staff to bleeding

Wider context from the report

“4. The automatic alarm triggered by the dialysis equipment was insufficiently sensitive to promptly alert staff to a bleed until between 200 – 2000 mls of blood had already been lost. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to position dialysis patients within a clear line of sight from the nurses station

Wider context from the report

“3. Mr O’Neill was placed in a position which was outside of a clear line of sight from the nurses station. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain adequate visibility for patient monitoring.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.