PFD report

Janet Brown Townend · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Nov 2024•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure to provide Safeguarding Adult Review outcomes and recommendations to review subjects
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes
  2. Failure to appropriately probe responses during Safeguarding Adult Reviews
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes
  3. Failure to document the full Safeguarding Adult Review process properly
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Disseminated lessons learned from the identified enquiry practice issues across the safeguarding team.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2024.
  2. Action

    Delivered training, learning and guidance to strengthen practitioners’ completion of safeguarding forms, professional curiosity and thorough enquiry practice.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2024.
  3. Action

    Implemented new forms guiding practitioners to undertake and record safeguarding concerns and Section 42 enquiries, including person and family voices and outcome-sharing records.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide Safeguarding Adult Review outcomes and recommendations to review subjects

Wider context from the report

“There was a referral to Adults Safeguarding from both Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Hull Royal Infirmary regarding concerns as to the care Ms Townend had received. As a result of the referrals there was a review that was deemed necessary. However, the quality of that review was lacking. The Safeguarding Adult Review that took place did not probe the responses received appropriately from the care company and the Community Nurses in any way. In evidence it was heard that the procedure adopted did not record how the responses had been obtained. The family's input was not recorded. The process happened hastily and the review not to the appropriate standards that would have been of any benefit. The outcomes of the review and recommendations were not provided to the subjects of the review. In evidence it was heard that there was a lack of professional curiosity and the full review process not followed or documented properly. The importance of Safeguarding reviews must not be underestimated. They are in place to identify concerns and prevent any such issues occurring in the future. The procedure conducted needs to be looked at to avoid any impact on anyone else. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to appropriately probe responses during Safeguarding Adult Reviews

Wider context from the report

“There was a referral to Adults Safeguarding from both Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Hull Royal Infirmary regarding concerns as to the care Ms Townend had received. As a result of the referrals there was a review that was deemed necessary. However, the quality of that review was lacking. The Safeguarding Adult Review that took place did not probe the responses received appropriately from the care company and the Community Nurses in any way. In evidence it was heard that the procedure adopted did not record how the responses had been obtained. The family's input was not recorded. The process happened hastily and the review not to the appropriate standards that would have been of any benefit. The outcomes of the review and recommendations were not provided to the subjects of the review. In evidence it was heard that there was a lack of professional curiosity and the full review process not followed or documented properly. The importance of Safeguarding reviews must not be underestimated. They are in place to identify concerns and prevent any such issues occurring in the future. The procedure conducted needs to be looked at to avoid any impact on anyone else. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to document the full Safeguarding Adult Review process properly

Wider context from the report

“There was a referral to Adults Safeguarding from both Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Hull Royal Infirmary regarding concerns as to the care Ms Townend had received. As a result of the referrals there was a review that was deemed necessary. However, the quality of that review was lacking. The Safeguarding Adult Review that took place did not probe the responses received appropriately from the care company and the Community Nurses in any way. In evidence it was heard that the procedure adopted did not record how the responses had been obtained. The family's input was not recorded. The process happened hastily and the review not to the appropriate standards that would have been of any benefit. The outcomes of the review and recommendations were not provided to the subjects of the review. In evidence it was heard that there was a lack of professional curiosity and the full review process not followed or documented properly. The importance of Safeguarding reviews must not be underestimated. They are in place to identify concerns and prevent any such issues occurring in the future. The procedure conducted needs to be looked at to avoid any impact on anyone else. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record how review responses were obtained

Wider context from the report

“There was a referral to Adults Safeguarding from both Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Hull Royal Infirmary regarding concerns as to the care Ms Townend had received. As a result of the referrals there was a review that was deemed necessary. However, the quality of that review was lacking. The Safeguarding Adult Review that took place did not probe the responses received appropriately from the care company and the Community Nurses in any way. In evidence it was heard that the procedure adopted did not record how the responses had been obtained. The family's input was not recorded. The process happened hastily and the review not to the appropriate standards that would have been of any benefit. The outcomes of the review and recommendations were not provided to the subjects of the review. In evidence it was heard that there was a lack of professional curiosity and the full review process not followed or documented properly. The importance of Safeguarding reviews must not be underestimated. They are in place to identify concerns and prevent any such issues occurring in the future. The procedure conducted needs to be looked at to avoid any impact on anyone else. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of safeguarding information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of adequate Safeguarding Adult Review quality

Wider context from the report

“There was a referral to Adults Safeguarding from both Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Hull Royal Infirmary regarding concerns as to the care Ms Townend had received. As a result of the referrals there was a review that was deemed necessary. However, the quality of that review was lacking. The Safeguarding Adult Review that took place did not probe the responses received appropriately from the care company and the Community Nurses in any way. In evidence it was heard that the procedure adopted did not record how the responses had been obtained. The family's input was not recorded. The process happened hastily and the review not to the appropriate standards that would have been of any benefit. The outcomes of the review and recommendations were not provided to the subjects of the review. In evidence it was heard that there was a lack of professional curiosity and the full review process not followed or documented properly. The importance of Safeguarding reviews must not be underestimated. They are in place to identify concerns and prevent any such issues occurring in the future. The procedure conducted needs to be looked at to avoid any impact on anyone else. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record family input in Safeguarding Adult Reviews

Wider context from the report

“There was a referral to Adults Safeguarding from both Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Hull Royal Infirmary regarding concerns as to the care Ms Townend had received. As a result of the referrals there was a review that was deemed necessary. However, the quality of that review was lacking. The Safeguarding Adult Review that took place did not probe the responses received appropriately from the care company and the Community Nurses in any way. In evidence it was heard that the procedure adopted did not record how the responses had been obtained. The family's input was not recorded. The process happened hastily and the review not to the appropriate standards that would have been of any benefit. The outcomes of the review and recommendations were not provided to the subjects of the review. In evidence it was heard that there was a lack of professional curiosity and the full review process not followed or documented properly. The importance of Safeguarding reviews must not be underestimated. They are in place to identify concerns and prevent any such issues occurring in the future. The procedure conducted needs to be looked at to avoid any impact on anyone else. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of safeguarding information; Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow the full Safeguarding Adult Review process

Wider context from the report

“There was a referral to Adults Safeguarding from both Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Hull Royal Infirmary regarding concerns as to the care Ms Townend had received. As a result of the referrals there was a review that was deemed necessary. However, the quality of that review was lacking. The Safeguarding Adult Review that took place did not probe the responses received appropriately from the care company and the Community Nurses in any way. In evidence it was heard that the procedure adopted did not record how the responses had been obtained. The family's input was not recorded. The process happened hastily and the review not to the appropriate standards that would have been of any benefit. The outcomes of the review and recommendations were not provided to the subjects of the review. In evidence it was heard that there was a lack of professional curiosity and the full review process not followed or documented properly. The importance of Safeguarding reviews must not be underestimated. They are in place to identify concerns and prevent any such issues occurring in the future. The procedure conducted needs to be looked at to avoid any impact on anyone else. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hasty Safeguarding Adult Review processes

Wider context from the report

“There was a referral to Adults Safeguarding from both Yorkshire Ambulance Service and Hull Royal Infirmary regarding concerns as to the care Ms Townend had received. As a result of the referrals there was a review that was deemed necessary. However, the quality of that review was lacking. The Safeguarding Adult Review that took place did not probe the responses received appropriately from the care company and the Community Nurses in any way. In evidence it was heard that the procedure adopted did not record how the responses had been obtained. The family's input was not recorded. The process happened hastily and the review not to the appropriate standards that would have been of any benefit. The outcomes of the review and recommendations were not provided to the subjects of the review. In evidence it was heard that there was a lack of professional curiosity and the full review process not followed or documented properly. The importance of Safeguarding reviews must not be underestimated. They are in place to identify concerns and prevent any such issues occurring in the future. The procedure conducted needs to be looked at to avoid any impact on anyone else. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable safeguarding review and learning processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminated lessons learned from the identified enquiry practice issues across the safeguarding team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The record of the enquiry also lacked analysis of the information that was received from both services approached for information and it was not fully triangulated with other information gathered from both Janet Brown Townend herself and members of her family within the record of the section 42 enquiry. It is difficult to say whether the outcome of the enquiry would have been different had these issues been addressed, however, it is acknowledged that the recorded evidence for decision making and subsequent actions in this case could have been improved. The practice issues identified in this enquiry have been addressed with the individual practitioner and lessons learned disseminated within the team.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 2 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delivered training, learning and guidance to strengthen practitioners’ completion of safeguarding forms, professional curiosity and thorough enquiry practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The roll out of the forms was accompanied by training and learning for those who are completing them, refreshing practitioners understanding about the expectations for their completion, what good looks like and encouraging professional curiosity. There is also accompanying guidance for practitioners within and external to the form to support them to undertake and record a thorough section 42 enquiry.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implemented new forms guiding practitioners to undertake and record safeguarding concerns and Section 42 enquiries, including person and family voices and outcome-sharing records.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In November 2023 (after this enquiry took place), as part of the implementation of a new service and practice model for safeguarding adults, the service launched a new set of forms to record safeguarding adult concerns and section 42 enquiries. These forms lead the practitioner through a much more succinct process for undertaking and recording their intervention with the voice of the person and their family/representative at the heart of the enquiry record.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 3 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implemented practice workshops and a weekly safeguarding hub forum providing case discussion and leadership guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To support high quality safeguarding adults enquiry practice, the services practice development team has implemented a training programme of practice workshops accompanied by a weekly practice forum with the safeguarding adults hub where cases can be discussed and practitioners obtain clear guidance from the safeguarding adults leadership team. The service also leads a safeguarding champions programme bringing professionals from within and external to the local authority together to share good practice and develop consistent responses to safeguarding across the sector.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 4 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Established a safeguarding champions programme bringing internal and external professionals together to share good practice and develop consistent sector responses.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2024.
  2. 2

    Apply to the East Riding Safeguarding Adults Board for a Safeguarding Adults Review concerning Janet Brown Townend.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 November 2024.
  3. 3

    Launched safeguarding audits with quarterly reporting and leadership oversight to measure quality, identify trends and monitor improvement actions.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2024.
  4. 4

    Implemented a safeguarding adults service model with a dedicated concerns hub and allocation of Section 42 enquiries to appropriate practitioners.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 November 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The Safeguarding Adults Board and its review group decide whether to progress a Safeguarding Adults Review; the Council can only submit an application.

    Stated by East Riding of Yorkshire CouncilRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Established a safeguarding champions programme bringing internal and external professionals together to share good practice and develop consistent sector responses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To support high quality safeguarding adults enquiry practice, the services practice development team has implemented a training programme of practice workshops accompanied by a weekly practice forum with the safeguarding adults hub where cases can be discussed and practitioners obtain clear guidance from the safeguarding adults leadership team. The service also leads a safeguarding champions programme bringing professionals from within and external to the local authority together to share good practice and develop consistent responses to safeguarding across the sector.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 4 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply to the East Riding Safeguarding Adults Board for a Safeguarding Adults Review concerning Janet Brown Townend.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further actions to be taken: Safeguarding Adults Reviews (SARs) are a statutory requirement for Safeguarding Adults Boards (SABs) under section 44 of The Care Act 2014. Safeguarding adult practice can be improved by identifying what is helping and what is hindering safeguarding work across the system partnership, in order to highlight good practice, learn lessons, continually improve, and pertinently protect adults from harm.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 4 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launched safeguarding audits with quarterly reporting and leadership oversight to measure quality, identify trends and monitor improvement actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The service has also launched a safeguarding audit to enable us to measure quality and identify themes and trends for improving and developing safeguarding adults practice further. This is overseen by the principal social worker and presented as part of the quarterly audit report to the practice development board where recommendations can be made to the Executive Director and their leadership team and to ensure collective oversight of actions taken and any required mitigations.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 4 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implemented a safeguarding adults service model with a dedicated concerns hub and allocation of Section 42 enquiries to appropriate practitioners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since this section 42 enquiry was undertaken, East Riding of Yorkshire Council have implemented a new service model for Safeguarding Adults inclusive of the new paperwork mentioned above.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 4 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Safeguarding Adults Board and its review group decide whether to progress a Safeguarding Adults Review; the Council can only submit an application.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further actions to be taken: Safeguarding Adults Reviews (SARs) are a statutory requirement for Safeguarding Adults Boards (SABs) under section 44 of The Care Act 2014. Safeguarding adult practice can be improved by identifying what is helping and what is hindering safeguarding work across the system partnership, in order to highlight good practice, learn lessons, continually improve, and pertinently protect adults from harm.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 4 · response
Published 5 November 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026