PFD report

Peter John WALKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Jun 2023•Suffolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of comprehensive medical guidance for pilots making Pilot Medical Declarations
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate medical fitness controls for safety-critical aviation personnel
  2. Lack of guidance for medical professionals on Pilot Medical Declaration standards
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate medical fitness controls for safety-critical aviation personnel
  3. Revalidation of certain aircraft ratings without independent assessment of ability or fitness to fly
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate medical fitness controls for safety-critical aviation personnel
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of comprehensive medical guidance for pilots making Pilot Medical Declarations

Wider context from the report

“However, unlike the DVLA the CAA provides no comprehensive guidance for the individual pilot making the self-declaration. As such the CAA provides no list of identifiable conditions that would either preclude the pilot flying, or any conditions which suggest the pilot should seeks further medical opinion regarding their fitness to fly. It was identified that the CAA provided no guidance to any medical professionals to alert them to the medical standards required for an individual making a Pilot Medical Declaration, should that individual approach them for a medical opinion regarding their fitness to fly. It was identified that the DVLA has an efficient centrally controlled system to manage medically related driving licence decisions and to coordinate licence revocation and licence surrender activities. The CAA has no such system to coordinate their licence revocation and licence surrender activities. It was identified, that any pilot of the type of aircraft being flown by Peter, who qualified on that type prior to 2008, can revalidate their licence to fly that type of aircraft by providing a self-declaration of evidence of experience of flying that aircraft. As the Pilot Medication Declaration system, and the licence revalidation procedure for this type of aircraft both rely on self-declarations only, it was identified that a pilot over 70 who flies this type of aircraft, can be revalidated to fly it without any independent third-party assessment of their actual ability or fitness to fly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate medical fitness controls for safety-critical aviation personnel.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance for medical professionals on Pilot Medical Declaration standards

Wider context from the report

“However, unlike the DVLA the CAA provides no comprehensive guidance for the individual pilot making the self-declaration. As such the CAA provides no list of identifiable conditions that would either preclude the pilot flying, or any conditions which suggest the pilot should seeks further medical opinion regarding their fitness to fly. It was identified that the CAA provided no guidance to any medical professionals to alert them to the medical standards required for an individual making a Pilot Medical Declaration, should that individual approach them for a medical opinion regarding their fitness to fly. It was identified that the DVLA has an efficient centrally controlled system to manage medically related driving licence decisions and to coordinate licence revocation and licence surrender activities. The CAA has no such system to coordinate their licence revocation and licence surrender activities. It was identified, that any pilot of the type of aircraft being flown by Peter, who qualified on that type prior to 2008, can revalidate their licence to fly that type of aircraft by providing a self-declaration of evidence of experience of flying that aircraft. As the Pilot Medication Declaration system, and the licence revalidation procedure for this type of aircraft both rely on self-declarations only, it was identified that a pilot over 70 who flies this type of aircraft, can be revalidated to fly it without any independent third-party assessment of their actual ability or fitness to fly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate medical fitness controls for safety-critical aviation personnel.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revalidation of certain aircraft ratings without independent assessment of ability or fitness to fly

Wider context from the report

“However, unlike the DVLA the CAA provides no comprehensive guidance for the individual pilot making the self-declaration. As such the CAA provides no list of identifiable conditions that would either preclude the pilot flying, or any conditions which suggest the pilot should seeks further medical opinion regarding their fitness to fly. It was identified that the CAA provided no guidance to any medical professionals to alert them to the medical standards required for an individual making a Pilot Medical Declaration, should that individual approach them for a medical opinion regarding their fitness to fly. It was identified that the DVLA has an efficient centrally controlled system to manage medically related driving licence decisions and to coordinate licence revocation and licence surrender activities. The CAA has no such system to coordinate their licence revocation and licence surrender activities. It was identified, that any pilot of the type of aircraft being flown by Peter, who qualified on that type prior to 2008, can revalidate their licence to fly that type of aircraft by providing a self-declaration of evidence of experience of flying that aircraft. As the Pilot Medication Declaration system, and the licence revalidation procedure for this type of aircraft both rely on self-declarations only, it was identified that a pilot over 70 who flies this type of aircraft, can be revalidated to fly it without any independent third-party assessment of their actual ability or fitness to fly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate medical fitness controls for safety-critical aviation personnel.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system to coordinate licence revocation and licence surrender activities

Wider context from the report

“However, unlike the DVLA the CAA provides no comprehensive guidance for the individual pilot making the self-declaration. As such the CAA provides no list of identifiable conditions that would either preclude the pilot flying, or any conditions which suggest the pilot should seeks further medical opinion regarding their fitness to fly. It was identified that the CAA provided no guidance to any medical professionals to alert them to the medical standards required for an individual making a Pilot Medical Declaration, should that individual approach them for a medical opinion regarding their fitness to fly. It was identified that the DVLA has an efficient centrally controlled system to manage medically related driving licence decisions and to coordinate licence revocation and licence surrender activities. The CAA has no such system to coordinate their licence revocation and licence surrender activities. It was identified, that any pilot of the type of aircraft being flown by Peter, who qualified on that type prior to 2008, can revalidate their licence to fly that type of aircraft by providing a self-declaration of evidence of experience of flying that aircraft. As the Pilot Medication Declaration system, and the licence revalidation procedure for this type of aircraft both rely on self-declarations only, it was identified that a pilot over 70 who flies this type of aircraft, can be revalidated to fly it without any independent third-party assessment of their actual ability or fitness to fly. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Monitor the CAA’s work and provide support through the UK State Safety Programme governance process to ensure the AAIB recommendations are addressed.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 July 2023.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Further Departmental intervention, including directing the CAA, is unnecessary because the CAA’s action adequately addresses the safety recommendations.

    Stated by Department for TransportNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor the CAA’s work and provide support through the UK State Safety Programme governance process to ensure the AAIB recommendations are addressed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I consider this action, on the part of CAA, to adequately address the recommendations made by the AAIB, though I note that the AAIB will continue to monitor progress. I do not therefore believe that, in light of CAA’s response, further intervention is needed by my Department to prevent further deaths, such as through the exercise of Civil Aviation Act 1982 powers to direct the CAA. I have requested that officials monitor the CAA’s work on this and provide support as needed to ensure the AAIB recommendations are adequately addressed. This will be done as part of a clear governance process under the UK’s State Safety Programme for Aviation.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Further Departmental intervention, including directing the CAA, is unnecessary because the CAA’s action adequately addresses the safety recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I consider this action, on the part of CAA, to adequately address the recommendations made by the AAIB, though I note that the AAIB will continue to monitor progress. I do not therefore believe that, in light of CAA’s response, further intervention is needed by my Department to prevent further deaths, such as through the exercise of Civil Aviation Act 1982 powers to direct the CAA. I have requested that officials monitor the CAA’s work on this and provide support as needed to ensure the AAIB recommendations are adequately addressed. This will be done as part of a clear governance process under the UK’s State Safety Programme for Aviation.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026