PFD report

QUY THI PHAM · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Aug 2025•Essex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
8

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised8

  1. Failure to identify concerning intermenstrual bleeding when post-partum menstrual cycles are irregular
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment
  2. Strict application of national cervical screening guidelines excluding women with atypical post-partum risk presentations
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment
  3. Failure to account for women who have not received HPV vaccination in cervical cancer screening
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Conduct research on the safety, accuracy and reliability of cervical screening within three months after birth.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 August 2025.
  2. Action

    Consider the research findings when available and assess their implications for national cervical screening guidance.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 August 2025.
  3. Action

    Notify Agilio Software of the concerns about cervical screening information.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 August 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Existing guidance is considered sufficient: symptomatic women should seek GP advice, screening is non-diagnostic, and screening should be delayed for three months after birth.

    Stated by NHS EnglandExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify concerning intermenstrual bleeding when post-partum menstrual cycles are irregular

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Trust hospital Consultant had raised concerns about the National Cervical Screening Guidance in the past and that may mean that a cohort of women may be excluded: i. The national guidance to identify post-coital bleeding as a symptom of concern for cervical cancer may not be helpful as not all post-partum women have resumed coitus ii. Post-partum colp can persist or be misinterpreted, meaning that bleeding may not be understood as abnormal iii. Women may not have a regular menstrual cycle, and bleeding may not be easy to identify as intermenstrual in accordance with the national guidance to give rise to a cause for concern iv. Rare complications of early-stage cervical cancer may not always manifest with symptoms of bleeding v. Not all women residing in the UK have had the HPV vaccine Those providing cervical screening services may be strictly applying the national guidelines and, with the proposed changes in National Screening this may increase the risk for women identified above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strict application of national cervical screening guidelines excluding women with atypical post-partum risk presentations

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Trust hospital Consultant had raised concerns about the National Cervical Screening Guidance in the past and that may mean that a cohort of women may be excluded: i. The national guidance to identify post-coital bleeding as a symptom of concern for cervical cancer may not be helpful as not all post-partum women have resumed coitus ii. Post-partum colp can persist or be misinterpreted, meaning that bleeding may not be understood as abnormal iii. Women may not have a regular menstrual cycle, and bleeding may not be easy to identify as intermenstrual in accordance with the national guidance to give rise to a cause for concern iv. Rare complications of early-stage cervical cancer may not always manifest with symptoms of bleeding v. Not all women residing in the UK have had the HPV vaccine Those providing cervical screening services may be strictly applying the national guidelines and, with the proposed changes in National Screening this may increase the risk for women identified above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to account for women who have not received HPV vaccination in cervical cancer screening

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Trust hospital Consultant had raised concerns about the National Cervical Screening Guidance in the past and that may mean that a cohort of women may be excluded: i. The national guidance to identify post-coital bleeding as a symptom of concern for cervical cancer may not be helpful as not all post-partum women have resumed coitus ii. Post-partum colp can persist or be misinterpreted, meaning that bleeding may not be understood as abnormal iii. Women may not have a regular menstrual cycle, and bleeding may not be easy to identify as intermenstrual in accordance with the national guidance to give rise to a cause for concern iv. Rare complications of early-stage cervical cancer may not always manifest with symptoms of bleeding v. Not all women residing in the UK have had the HPV vaccine Those providing cervical screening services may be strictly applying the national guidelines and, with the proposed changes in National Screening this may increase the risk for women identified above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of staffing for cervical screening appointments

Wider context from the report

“(2) Ms Pham attended the GP surgery at approximately 9 weeks post-partum and was informed that she must wait until she was at least 12 weeks post-partum to have her smear. This appointment was then cancelled due to staff shortages. (3) The Trust hospital Consultant explained that the most important factor to diagnose a patient is having a smear test and that it was not prohibited to have a smear test at 9-weeks post-partum, especially if a patient had not had a previous smear test, as in the case of Ms Pham who had an early-stage cervical cancer with no infiltration into surrounding organs or structures. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify early-stage cervical cancer without bleeding symptoms

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Trust hospital Consultant had raised concerns about the National Cervical Screening Guidance in the past and that may mean that a cohort of women may be excluded: i. The national guidance to identify post-coital bleeding as a symptom of concern for cervical cancer may not be helpful as not all post-partum women have resumed coitus ii. Post-partum colp can persist or be misinterpreted, meaning that bleeding may not be understood as abnormal iii. Women may not have a regular menstrual cycle, and bleeding may not be easy to identify as intermenstrual in accordance with the national guidance to give rise to a cause for concern iv. Rare complications of early-stage cervical cancer may not always manifest with symptoms of bleeding v. Not all women residing in the UK have had the HPV vaccine Those providing cervical screening services may be strictly applying the national guidelines and, with the proposed changes in National Screening this may increase the risk for women identified above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to distinguish post-partum bleeding from abnormal bleeding

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Trust hospital Consultant had raised concerns about the National Cervical Screening Guidance in the past and that may mean that a cohort of women may be excluded: i. The national guidance to identify post-coital bleeding as a symptom of concern for cervical cancer may not be helpful as not all post-partum women have resumed coitus ii. Post-partum colp can persist or be misinterpreted, meaning that bleeding may not be understood as abnormal iii. Women may not have a regular menstrual cycle, and bleeding may not be easy to identify as intermenstrual in accordance with the national guidance to give rise to a cause for concern iv. Rare complications of early-stage cervical cancer may not always manifest with symptoms of bleeding v. Not all women residing in the UK have had the HPV vaccine Those providing cervical screening services may be strictly applying the national guidelines and, with the proposed changes in National Screening this may increase the risk for women identified above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Cervical screening guidance failing to identify post-partum women without resumed coitus as potentially at risk

Wider context from the report

“(4) The Trust hospital Consultant had raised concerns about the National Cervical Screening Guidance in the past and that may mean that a cohort of women may be excluded: i. The national guidance to identify post-coital bleeding as a symptom of concern for cervical cancer may not be helpful as not all post-partum women have resumed coitus ii. Post-partum colp can persist or be misinterpreted, meaning that bleeding may not be understood as abnormal iii. Women may not have a regular menstrual cycle, and bleeding may not be easy to identify as intermenstrual in accordance with the national guidance to give rise to a cause for concern iv. Rare complications of early-stage cervical cancer may not always manifest with symptoms of bleeding v. Not all women residing in the UK have had the HPV vaccine Those providing cervical screening services may be strictly applying the national guidelines and, with the proposed changes in National Screening this may increase the risk for women identified above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide timely post-partum cervical smear testing

Wider context from the report

“(2) Ms Pham attended the GP surgery at approximately 9 weeks post-partum and was informed that she must wait until she was at least 12 weeks post-partum to have her smear. This appointment was then cancelled due to staff shortages. (3) The Trust hospital Consultant explained that the most important factor to diagnose a patient is having a smear test and that it was not prohibited to have a smear test at 9-weeks post-partum, especially if a patient had not had a previous smear test, as in the case of Ms Pham who had an early-stage cervical cancer with no infiltration into surrounding organs or structures. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably detect cervical cancer through screening and assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct research on the safety, accuracy and reliability of cervical screening within three months after birth.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is research underway supported by the cervical screening programme to collect evidence on whether it is safe, accurate and reliable to report cervical screening tests within 3 months of birth. This research is expected to conclude by September 2027. When the findings of this research are available, NHS England will consider them and update national guidance accordingly.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 15 August 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider the research findings when available and assess their implications for national cervical screening guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is research underway supported by the cervical screening programme to collect evidence on whether it is safe, accurate and reliable to report cervical screening tests within 3 months of birth. This research is expected to conclude by September 2027. When the findings of this research are available, NHS England will consider them and update national guidance accordingly.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 15 August 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Notify Agilio Software of the concerns about cervical screening information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will make Agilio aware of the concerns you raise so that they can check for any updates to the NHS Cervical Screening Programme when they next update this topic.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 15 August 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing guidance is considered sufficient: symptomatic women should seek GP advice, screening is non-diagnostic, and screening should be delayed for three months after birth.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The aim of the national cervical screening programme is to detect asymptomatic cell changes in the cervix that could, if left untreated, develop into cervical cancer in the future. The screening programme guidance for patients with unusual bleeding or gynaecological symptoms they are concerned about is always to seek advice from their GP. A cervical screening test is not an appropriate tool to investigate these concerns as it is not a diagnostic test.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 15 August 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Postnatal screening would probably not have prevented the death because the cancer was aggressive, metastatic at presentation and incurable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Based on the clinical history provided which has been reviewed by clinical experts who support NHS England’s cervical screening team, Quy suffered from an aggressive form of cervical cancer which metastasised to the lungs at presentation. It is accepted that unusual and rapidly developing cervical cancers are unlikely to be prevented by screening. Even if Quy had received post-natal screening in July 2024, on the balance of probabilities, Quy would still have had an aggressive cervical cancer with lung metastases which, sadly, would still have been incurable.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 15 August 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England’s NHS Cervical Screening Programme is best placed to address the concerns about postpartum cervical screening.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Firstly, it may be helpful for me to clarify that the recommendation that cervical screening should be delayed for women who are less than 12 weeks post-partum does not come from guidance produced by NICE, but from Public Health England (PHE) guidelines, ‘Ceasing and deferring women from the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (PHE, 2019)’. We believe that the issues raised within your report are therefore best addressed by NHS England’s NHS Cervical Screening programme, and I note that your report has also been sent to them.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 15 August 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The recommendation to delay cervical screening for women under 12 weeks postpartum does not originate from NICE guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Firstly, it may be helpful for me to clarify that the recommendation that cervical screening should be delayed for women who are less than 12 weeks post-partum does not come from guidance produced by NICE, but from Public Health England (PHE) guidelines, ‘Ceasing and deferring women from the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (PHE, 2019)’. We believe that the issues raised within your report are therefore best addressed by NHS England’s NHS Cervical Screening programme, and I note that your report has also been sent to them.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 15 August 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss received Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share relevant learning nationally and regionally.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 August 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss received Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share relevant learning nationally and regionally.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Quy, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 15 August 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026