PFD report

Rohan GODHANIA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Aug 2023•Milton Keynes

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of guidance for testing ammonia levels in patients presenting in extremis with an unknown cause
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably investigate metabolic causes of acute clinical presentations
  2. Lack of clarity and consistent guidance for classifying teenagers aged 16-18 as paediatric patients or adults
  3. Failure of high-protein supplement and drink labels to provide adequate warnings and safety information for people with urea cycle disorders
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate product safety warnings about serious hazards
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Issue a Patient Safety Bulletin highlighting prompt ammonia measurement and action when hyperammonaemia is identified.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 September 2023.
  2. Action

    Develop guidance supporting consistent, age-appropriate transition pathways and defining core staff capabilities within a 0–25 care model.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 September 2023.
  3. Action

    Move toward a person-centred 0–25 service model for young people’s mental and physical healthcare.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 September 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Concerns about ammonia-testing guidance should be referred to the Royal Colleges.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance for testing ammonia levels in patients presenting in extremis with an unknown cause

Wider context from the report

“2. Guidance for Testing for Ammonia in Emergency Departments The other concerning issue that requires immediate attention is the lack of guidance for testing ammonia levels in patients who present in extremis with an unknown cause. Timely and accurate diagnosis is essential in such cases to ensure appropriate treatment and prevent unnecessary deaths. The guideline should include clear protocols for conducting ammonia tests, interpreting the results and making informed clinical decisions based on the findings. The guidance should be disseminated to all emergency departments and healthcare facilities. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably investigate metabolic causes of acute clinical presentations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity and consistent guidance for classifying teenagers aged 16-18 as paediatric patients or adults

Wider context from the report

“1. Age classification of Teenagers 16-18 within the NHS There seems to be a lack of clarity and consistent guidance across the NHS regarding the appropriate classification of teenagers aged 16-18. The question of whether they should be treated as paediatric patients or adults is leading to confusion and potential disparities in the care provided. I consider that this should be urgently reviewed by NHS England and if necessary the guidance on age classification updated ensuring that all healthcare providers adhere to a unified approach emphasising the importance of consistent and appropriate care for this age group. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of high-protein supplement and drink labels to provide adequate warnings and safety information for people with urea cycle disorders

Wider context from the report

“High protein supplements and drinks are easily accessible to the general public, yet their labels fail to adequately inform consumers about the potential dangers posed to individuals with urea cycle disorders, such as Ornithine Transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency. This genetic disorder can lead to severe medical emergencies, requiring immediate medical intervention to prevent life-threatening complications. This disorder can be triggered by the sudden increased ingestion of protein. Consideration should be given as to whether the labels should prominently display a warning about the potential risks for individuals with an undiagnosed urea cycle disorder and include clear and concise information on symptoms of this and the importance of seeking immediate medical advice. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate product safety warnings about serious hazards.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a Patient Safety Bulletin highlighting prompt ammonia measurement and action when hyperammonaemia is identified.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England’s National Patient Safety Team have also undertaken work with the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) on the specific issue of hyperammonaemia and ammonia testing. As a result of this a Patient Safety Bulletin was issued. This highlighted the need for ‘prompt measurement of ammonia and action in the event of hyperammonaemia’.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop guidance supporting consistent, age-appropriate transition pathways and defining core staff capabilities within a 0–25 care model.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England’s Children and Young People’s Transformation Programme, working with key stakeholders, are developing guidance to aid the design of transition pathways that improve health outcomes for all young people. The support package will outline key principles of a 0 – 25 model of care and the core capabilities of staff”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Move toward a person-centred 0–25 service model for young people’s mental and physical healthcare.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Most children’s hospitals/departments are not commissioned to provide secondary and tertiary services for young people over the age of 16, with the exception of some rare cancers and those over this age are therefore often treated as adult patients. To improve young people’s experience of care, outcomes and continuity of care, NHS England are committed to moving to a ‘0-25 year service model’, offering person-centred and age-appropriate care for mental and physical health needs, rather than arbitrary transitions to adult services based on age and not need. We recognise that healthcare transition should be need and complexity based, not managed solely on diagnosis or what is routinely provided.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the coroner’s report with DHSC to support consideration of additional food labelling.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As noted above, nutritional and broader health advice on whether and how it could be included on labelling is the responsibility of DHSC in England. We will share your report with DHSC so that they can more fully consider your recommendation for additional labelling. It may also be worth you writing to them directly, copied to DEFRA as the department responsible for food compositional standards and labelling”

Source location

Response from Food Standards Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Concerns about ammonia-testing guidance should be referred to the Royal Colleges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England would not be the lead organisation for the relevant clinical guidance, and you may wish to refer your concerns to the Royal Colleges. NHS England has, however, engaged with the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) on this case, and they have advised that they will be making an amendment to their existing Acute Behavioural Disturbance guidelines to specifically mention ammonia levels, should a clinician be considering the need for a metabolic screen.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is not the lead organisation for developing guidance on ammonia testing in emergency departments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England would not be the lead organisation for the relevant clinical guidance, and you may wish to refer your concerns to the Royal Colleges. NHS England has, however, engaged with the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) on this case, and they have advised that they will be making an amendment to their existing Acute Behavioural Disturbance guidelines to specifically mention ammonia levels, should a clinician be considering the need for a metabolic screen.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for food compositional standards and labelling rests with DEFRA in England.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The FSA has responsibility for food and feed safety and hygiene in England and Wales, food compositional standards and labelling policy in Northern Ireland and Wales, and nutritional health claims and nutritional labelling in Northern Ireland. In England responsibility for food compositional standards and labelling policies rests with the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Nutritional health claims and nutritional labelling responsibility rests with the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) in England and the Welsh Government in Wales.”

Source location

Response from Food Standards Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for nutritional and broader health advice on additional food labelling rests with DHSC in England.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The FSA has responsibility for food and feed safety and hygiene in England and Wales, food compositional standards and labelling policy in Northern Ireland and Wales, and nutritional health claims and nutritional labelling in Northern Ireland. In England responsibility for food compositional standards and labelling policies rests with the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Nutritional health claims and nutritional labelling responsibility rests with the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) in England and the Welsh Government in Wales.”

Source location

Response from Food Standards Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Discuss received Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share associated learning across national and regional NHS organisations.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 September 2023.
  2. 2

    Share awareness of Rohan’s case with health systems across England through regional representatives.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 September 2023.
  3. 3

    Discuss Rohan’s case through the Regulation 28 Working Group to consider further national or regional safety actions.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 September 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss received Prevention of Future Deaths reports through the Regulation 28 Working Group and share associated learning across national and regional NHS organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share awareness of Rohan’s case with health systems across England through regional representatives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The cause of Rohan’s hyperammonaemia was Ornithine Transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency, which is a very rare condition, and in Rohan’s case, there was also late presentation. Urgent and Emergency Care (UEC) specialist colleagues at NHS England have also advised that there can be complexity in interpreting the results of ammonia levels testing. The Regulation 28 Working Group (please see penultimate paragraph for more details) will be discussing this case to consider any further actions and regional representatives will be sharing for awareness of this case with health systems across England.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss Rohan’s case through the Regulation 28 Working Group to consider further national or regional safety actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The cause of Rohan’s hyperammonaemia was Ornithine Transcarbamylase (OTC) deficiency, which is a very rare condition, and in Rohan’s case, there was also late presentation. Urgent and Emergency Care (UEC) specialist colleagues at NHS England have also advised that there can be complexity in interpreting the results of ammonia levels testing. The Regulation 28 Working Group (please see penultimate paragraph for more details) will be discussing this case to consider any further actions and regional representatives will be sharing for awareness of this case with health systems across England.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 6 September 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026