PFD report

Elijah Oluwagbenga Shotade · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Sep 2018•North West Wales

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Road layout preventing westbound motorists from returning to the nearside lane after overtaking
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe overtaking controls on hazardous road sectionsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe road design and layout
  2. Satnav directions encouraging westbound motorists to enter the eastbound lane
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Extend double white lines across Britannia Bridge and install lane arrows reinforcing the direction of travel.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 January 2019.
  2. Action

    Review traffic signing and road markings across Britannia Bridge to identify recommended safety improvements.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 January 2019.
  3. Action

    Improve signing to reinforce that vehicles should keep left.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 January 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Drivers remain responsible for disregarding satellite-navigation instructions that would endanger road users or breach road safety standards.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Road layout preventing westbound motorists from returning to the nearside lane after overtaking

Wider context from the report

“(1) That the layout of the road is such that motorists driving in a west bound direction will remain the east bound lane after overtaking and are unable to return to their nearside lane. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe overtaking controls on hazardous road sections; Unsafe road design and layout.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Satnav directions encouraging westbound motorists to enter the eastbound lane

Wider context from the report

“(2) That many sat.navs direct a west bound motorist to bear right thereby encouraging them to enter onto the east bound lane ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extend double white lines across Britannia Bridge and install lane arrows reinforcing the direction of travel.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The extension of the double white lines prohibiting overtaking over the whole length of Britannia Bridge and lane arrows to reinforce the direction of travel has now been completed. Improvements to the signing, which will affirm that vehicles should keep left, will follow before the end of the financial year.”

Source location

2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review traffic signing and road markings across Britannia Bridge to identify recommended safety improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Notwithstanding the outcome of these investigations the Welsh Government decided to carry out a review of the traffic signing and road markings across the A55 Britannia Bridge and implement any recommended improvements as soon as possible in the 2017/18 financial year.”

Source location

2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve signing to reinforce that vehicles should keep left.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The extension of the double white lines prohibiting overtaking over the whole length of Britannia Bridge and lane arrows to reinforce the direction of travel has now been completed. Improvements to the signing, which will affirm that vehicles should keep left, will follow before the end of the financial year.”

Source location

2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Drivers remain responsible for disregarding satellite-navigation instructions that would endanger road users or breach road safety standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While satellite navigation systems are navigational tool for drivers, it remains the driver’s responsibility to observe and obey road markings and signs. If a satellite navigation system instruction is likely to lead to a manoeuvre that endangers other road users, the driver of a vehicle should not comply with it. Drivers must not follow any satellite navigation system instructions which would be to the detriment of road safety.”

Source location

2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Continue monitoring site safety through the Stage 4 Road Safety Audit process.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 18 January 2019.
  2. 2

    Carry out a Stage 3 Road Safety Audit after implementing all improvements.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 18 January 2019.
  3. 3

    Complete Stage 1 and Stage 2 Road Safety Audits for the improvement designs.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 18 January 2019.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Traffic signs and road markings complied with required standards, and collision records showed no historical pattern of similar incidents.

    Stated by Welsh GovernmentDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring site safety through the Stage 4 Road Safety Audit process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The design of all improvements has been subject to Stage 1 and 2 Road Safety Audits. A Stage 3 Road Safety Audit will be carried out following the implementation of all the improvements. The safety of the site will continue to be monitored as part of the Stage 4 Road Safety Audit process.”

Source location

2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carry out a Stage 3 Road Safety Audit after implementing all improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The design of all improvements has been subject to Stage 1 and 2 Road Safety Audits. A Stage 3 Road Safety Audit will be carried out following the implementation of all the improvements. The safety of the site will continue to be monitored as part of the Stage 4 Road Safety Audit process.”

Source location

2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete Stage 1 and Stage 2 Road Safety Audits for the improvement designs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The design of all improvements has been subject to Stage 1 and 2 Road Safety Audits. A Stage 3 Road Safety Audit will be carried out following the implementation of all the improvements. The safety of the site will continue to be monitored as part of the Stage 4 Road Safety Audit process.”

Source location

2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Traffic signs and road markings complied with required standards, and collision records showed no historical pattern of similar incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The traffic signs and road markings were in compliance with the required standard – the Traffic Sign Regulations and General Directions (TSRGD) 2016. The collision records for the previous 5 years (1st January 2013 to 31st December 2017) did not highlight a pattern of previous collisions similar in nature to those outlined above.”

Source location

2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
Page 2 · response
Published 18 January 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026