PFD report

Janet Scott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Feb 2025•Cumbria

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to adopt a multiagency safeguarding approach
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate multi-agency safeguarding coordination
  2. Failure to make safeguarding referrals when other agencies are thought to be aware
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to act appropriately on safeguarding referrals and noticesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable coordination of referrals between healthcare teams
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Audit cases involving self-neglect risk, assess referral, escalation and management oversight, and share findings with partners for practice review.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 February 2025.
  2. Action

    Continue delivering multi-agency self-neglect training across the partnership, including training for the GP practice.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 February 2025.
  3. Action

    Introduce a multi-agency risk management framework within six months for earlier intervention and referrals involving adults with complex needs and serious-risk concerns.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 February 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The Integrated Care Board is leading work to ensure escalation processes and safeguarding responsibilities are understood across primary care services.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to adopt a multiagency safeguarding approach

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although individual agencies referred me to training they had provided to staff since Ms Scott's death, I also received evidence that, for instance, the GP surgery might not raise a safeguarding referral if the same circumstances were repeated because social services had already been informed. This leads me to be concerned that the message that 'safeguarding is everyone's responsibility' has not been taken on board. I am concerned that future cases will occur in which a multiagency approach is not adopted or that individuals will not make safeguarding referrals because they assume that other agencies are already aware of the issue. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate multi-agency safeguarding coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make safeguarding referrals when other agencies are thought to be aware

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although individual agencies referred me to training they had provided to staff since Ms Scott's death, I also received evidence that, for instance, the GP surgery might not raise a safeguarding referral if the same circumstances were repeated because social services had already been informed. This leads me to be concerned that the message that 'safeguarding is everyone's responsibility' has not been taken on board. I am concerned that future cases will occur in which a multiagency approach is not adopted or that individuals will not make safeguarding referrals because they assume that other agencies are already aware of the issue. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to act appropriately on safeguarding referrals and notices; Unreliable coordination of referrals between healthcare teams.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit cases involving self-neglect risk, assess referral, escalation and management oversight, and share findings with partners for practice review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Audits of clients at risk of self-neglect have evidenced a range of referral sources including (but not limited to) family, friends and neighbours; community health staff; probation workers; fire service personnel and GPs. Close examination of records includes historic cases as well as recent referrals and consideration of whether appropriate and timely action was taken (including escalation to safeguarding procedures) and if there has been sufficient management oversight. Findings from these audits will be shared with partners across NCASP via the task and finish group once completed and implications for practice considered and kept under review.”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue delivering multi-agency self-neglect training across the partnership, including training for the GP practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“tool for use by practitioners and outlines suggested responses depending upon the level of risk and harm identified. The policy emphasises the importance of a person-centred approach as well as the need to balance autonomy with protection and a duty of care, which was highlighted in the review of Ms Scott’s death. Multi-agency training has been delivered across the partnership to increase awareness of the policy, and training will continue throughout 2025 including with Ms Scott’s GP practice in July 2025.”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a multi-agency risk management framework within six months for earlier intervention and referrals involving adults with complex needs and serious-risk concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Multi-agency Risk Management (MARM) Framework NCASP will introduce a multi-agency risk management framework within 6 months, which will set out a shared commitment across agencies who work with risk in Northumberland and will provide practice guidance to practitioners who are working with adults who have multiple and complex needs and are at risk of serious harm or abuse. This framework will support professionals to provide earlier multi-agency intervention than traditional safeguarding procedures and encourage referrals for low level concerns before they become significant and critical.”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Integrated Care Board is leading work to ensure escalation processes and safeguarding responsibilities are understood across primary care services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, as a Statutory Partner, the Integrated Care Board are taking the lead in relation to ensuring escalation processes and safeguarding responsibilities are widely known and understood across Primary Care services and will ensure evidence of this is shared with NCASP.”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Update the safeguarding review framework and guidance to improve case identification, including the introduced Rapid Review process.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 February 2025.
  2. 2

    Require partnership teams to provide quarterly feedback on discussion and resulting practice changes within three months of new policies or guidance being published.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 February 2025.
  3. 3

    Add a requirement for the partnership to assess the impact of review learning one year after completion of a Safeguarding Adult Review.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 February 2025.
  4. 4

    Apply and reiterate the adopted Principles of Engagement for professionals working with complex clients.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 February 2025.
  5. 5

    Implement the updated self-neglect policy, including its risk-rating tool and person-centred safeguarding guidance.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 February 2025.
  6. 6

    Operate a multi-agency neglect task-and-finish group addressing self-neglect awareness, pathways, engagement, training and related practice issues.

    Stated by Northumberland Children and Adults Safeguarding PartnershipStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 February 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the safeguarding review framework and guidance to improve case identification, including the introduced Rapid Review process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Impact assessment of learning from reviews NCASP’s SAR Framework and Practice Guidance has been updated to reflect improvements to processes for identifying cases that may warrant review including the introduction of a Rapid Review process which allows earlier identification of areas of learning and good practice. Prior to publication a further requirement will be added that the partnership must review the impact of the learning one-year post completion of a SAR.”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require partnership teams to provide quarterly feedback on discussion and resulting practice changes within three months of new policies or guidance being published.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Policy and Procedure implementation feedback NCASP will adopt an approach that requires teams across the partnership to feedback when newly introduced policies and guidance, including those on self-neglect have been discussed and the changes to practice that will follow. Agencies will be required to report into the Practice Learning Group which meets quarterly, within 3 months of new policies and practice guidance being published.”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add a requirement for the partnership to assess the impact of review learning one year after completion of a Safeguarding Adult Review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Impact assessment of learning from reviews NCASP’s SAR Framework and Practice Guidance has been updated to reflect improvements to processes for identifying cases that may warrant review including the introduction of a Rapid Review process which allows earlier identification of areas of learning and good practice. Prior to publication a further requirement will be added that the partnership must review the impact of the learning one-year post completion of a SAR.”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Apply and reiterate the adopted Principles of Engagement for professionals working with complex clients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Principles of Engagement across the Partnership² Nine clear and concise principles have been adopted for professionals to consider when working with complex clients including recognition that vulnerability can impact on a person’s ability to engage and the potential consequences if we fail to engage the client. These principles were published in November 2024 and are being reiterated within self-neglect training sessions throughout 2025.”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the updated self-neglect policy, including its risk-rating tool and person-centred safeguarding guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Updated Self-neglect Policy in 2024¹ This revised guidance was launched across the partnership during Safeguarding Adults Week in November 2024 and provides guidance for skilled practice in the context of self-neglect. This includes a clutter rating”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a multi-agency neglect task-and-finish group addressing self-neglect awareness, pathways, engagement, training and related practice issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Neglect (including Self-neglect) as a Strategic Priority NCASP have identified neglect as a priority area of work (as from 2023-2026) which we hope will improve outcomes for adults and children. The impact will be measured via assurance work and performance frameworks. A multi-agency task and finish group has been in place since March 2024 and has been looking at the following areas:”

Source location

Response from Northumberland Children's and Adults Safeguarding Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 27 February 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026