PFD report

Ruth Carla Perry · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Dec 2023•Berkshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
12

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
53

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised12

  1. Failure to formalise post-inspection confidentiality arrangements in written policy
  2. Lack of training or policy for recognising and responding to school leader distress during inspections
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable Ofsted inspection processes
  3. Failure of overall inspection labels to distinguish materially different school performance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.19

  1. Action

    Deliver mandatory mental-health awareness training to inspectors before they lead inspections, completing workforce rollout by March 2024.

    Stated by OfstedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  2. Action

    Publish and implement a policy allowing inspections to pause when serious issues require substantial action.

    Stated by OfstedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  3. Action

    Update policies and documentation to permit leaders to share provisional inspection outcomes with personal, medical and professional support networks.

    Stated by OfstedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    The Department for Education owns the support available to headteachers; Ofsted’s role is to promote awareness and uptake during inspections.

    Stated by OfstedRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to formalise post-inspection confidentiality arrangements in written policy

Wider context from the report

“4. The confidentiality requirement after an inspection. Some changes have been made already, but this is not yet written into policy. Given how long this policy has been in place, school leaders may fear discussing outcomes with colleagues outside of the school, and mental health professionals, unless this is expressly dealt with in written policy. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of training or policy for recognising and responding to school leader distress during inspections

Wider context from the report

“2. There is an almost complete absence of Ofsted training or published policy in the following areas: a. Signs of distress in school leaders during an inspection (this will be obvious to some, but not to all). b. Practical steps to deal with such distress. c. Pausing an inspection by reason of the distress of a school leader. d. Who can attend meetings with the inspectors during the inspection process. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Ofsted inspection processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of overall inspection labels to distinguish materially different school performance

Wider context from the report

“1. The first of these relates to my hypothetical schools A and B point, referred to above. I am concerned about the impact on school leader welfare that this system may continue to have. Transparency and ease of message to parents is not currently weighed against teacher welfare. The current system allows a school which is inadequate in all areas to receive the same overall label as a school which is good in all areas, but with some safeguarding issues which can be repaired by the time the report is published. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about the form of expanded school leader wellbeing support

Wider context from the report

“7. In an Ofsted publication dated 12th June 2023, the Secretary of State for Education was quoted as follows: “We must ensure our school leaders have the support they need, which is why today we are significantly expanding our wellbeing support. This expansion will help make sure headteachers have access to support whenever they need it”. The Ofsted witness was not able to clarify what form this additional support has taken. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of policy for pausing inspections because of school leader distress

Wider context from the report

“2. There is an almost complete absence of Ofsted training or published policy in the following areas: a. Signs of distress in school leaders during an inspection (this will be obvious to some, but not to all). b. Practical steps to deal with such distress. c. Pausing an inspection by reason of the distress of a school leader. d. Who can attend meetings with the inspectors during the inspection process. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Ofsted inspection processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct or require learning reviews of inspection-related concerns

Wider context from the report

“6. No learning review of these matters was conducted by Ofsted. There is no policy requiring this to be done. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify and address recurring safety issues through organisational learning.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to weigh school leader welfare in inspection communications

Wider context from the report

“1. The first of these relates to my hypothetical schools A and B point, referred to above. I am concerned about the impact on school leader welfare that this system may continue to have. Transparency and ease of message to parents is not currently weighed against teacher welfare. The current system allows a school which is inadequate in all areas to receive the same overall label as a school which is good in all areas, but with some safeguarding issues which can be repaired by the time the report is published. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of a clear escalation path for unresolved inspection concerns

Wider context from the report

“3. Absence of a clear path to raise concerns during an inspection if these cannot be resolved directly with the lead inspector. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Ofsted inspection processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of policy on who may attend meetings with inspectors

Wider context from the report

“2. There is an almost complete absence of Ofsted training or published policy in the following areas: a. Signs of distress in school leaders during an inspection (this will be obvious to some, but not to all). b. Practical steps to deal with such distress. c. Pausing an inspection by reason of the distress of a school leader. d. Who can attend meetings with the inspectors during the inspection process. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Ofsted inspection processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of written policy or guidance for communicating available mental health support options

Wider context from the report

“3. We heard in evidence that school leaders have received correspondence from Reading Borough Council about what mental health support options are available. I am concerned to know whether there is now written policy or guidance about communicating this, so that this continues to happen in future years. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct or require internal reviews of inspection-related matters

Wider context from the report

“2. Reading Borough Council also did not carry out any form of internal review. I was not made aware of any policy setting out when such an internal review should take place. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of written policy or guidance for Reading Borough Council's proactive response to Ofsted concerns

Wider context from the report

“1. Reading Borough Council indicated an intention to adopt a much more robust and proactive approach to dealing with Ofsted, particularly where there are concerns about an inspection. This is not written policy or guidance – which may go some way towards reassuring school leaders that their employer ‘has their back’ – both now and in future years. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Ofsted inspection processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mandatory mental-health awareness training to inspectors before they lead inspections, completing workforce rollout by March 2024.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We set a later start date for school and further education (FE) inspections this term to enable us to provide mental health awareness training for all inspectors, in all the areas we work (inspections continued in social care and early years, where we are also the regulator). This training is not just about spotting signs of distress but also about how we work to reduce anxiety while carrying out our crucial duty. We recognise that any form of inspection is likely to be challenging, but it must be proportionate and carried out with care.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish and implement a policy allowing inspections to pause when serious issues require substantial action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Coroner is correct that there has previously been no clear, written policy for pausing inspections. Every inspector and every school leader must have clarity about when and how to pause inspections. We also want to give leaders confidence that a request for a pause will not affect adversely the judgements made about a school. In response to our consultation on complaints about inspection, we introduced a new process for pausing inspection in December 2023, using a national helpline. We have since developed and published a national policy on pausing inspections (2c).”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 11 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update policies and documentation to permit leaders to share provisional inspection outcomes with personal, medical and professional support networks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have now updated our handbooks to make it clear that leaders can share the provisional inspection outcome and findings with whoever they deem appropriate. Leaders can share their provisional inspection outcomes with colleagues, family, medical advisers and their wider support group as they see fit.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 16 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint an independent expert to lead and publish recommendations from a learning review of the response to Ruth Perry’s death.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will appoint an independent expert to lead a learning review of Ofsted’s response to the tragic death of Ruth Perry. We will respond to the recommendations of this review as part of our response to the Big Listen.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 6 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clarify through handbooks, guidance, conduct codes, complaints procedures and engagement how providers can raise concerns about inspector behaviour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We will also clarify in our handbooks, accompanying guidance, code of conduct, complaints procedures and during stakeholder engagement, how providers can raise concerns about inspectors’ behaviour, including any safeguarding concerns. We have already started this process, for example publishing an update to the education inspection handbooks, and intend to complete it by the end of March 2024.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 15 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and maintain clear policies and training for recognising and responding to distress during inspections.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Inspectors should take steps to minimise stress and anxiety during inspection. They should be able to recognise signs of distress in those they meet and know how to respond. Ofsted will therefore immediately begin developing clear and robust policies and training to improve practice and enable inspectors to identify and respond to signs of distress in leaders and staff (2a and 2b).”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 10 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review how safeguarding fits within education-framework judgements, including whether it should become a standalone judgement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We know we need to go further to continue to improve our processes and to rebuild the confidence of the sector in our work. Between January and March 2024, we will conduct a formal internal review of where aspects of safeguarding fit within the individual judgements of the education inspection framework, subject to challenge from an expert group. We will explore having safeguarding as a standalone judgement, decoupled from the leadership and management grade. We intend to complete this internal review in time to consult on options through the Big Listen, with the response to the Big Listen setting out our agreed approach to reform.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 9 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share information about available headteacher wellbeing support through inspector training, provider documents and other communication channels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We recognise that the DfE has ownership of the support available to headteachers, but we do believe that our inspectorate can play a positive role in ensuring support is known about and taken up when necessary. We have engaged closely with the DfE on this and recognise that inspectors should be conversant with this support and ready to remind leaders that it is available. Through our ongoing inspector training, we will reinforce the expectation that they share this information with leaders at the beginning of an inspection. We will make sure that this information is contained within documents we share with providers on inspection. We will also use our other existing channels of communication to share information about the support available to leaders, which will not only help them but also increase their capacity to support the children in their care.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 20 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update inspection handbooks and practice to clarify leaders’ attendance and accompaniment at inspection team meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. From December 2023, during notification calls, inspectors have been required to actively remind and encourage headteachers to have someone accompany them at end-of-day inspection team meetings. Inspectors emphasise that school leaders are invited to attend the meeting but are not required to, with no conclusions drawn if they do not wish to attend. We reiterated this in our December 2023 briefing to inspectors, helping to ensure that we see – and schools experience – consistent practice from our inspector workforce (2d).”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 12 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and publish a long-term inspector development programme supporting leaders’ mental health and wellbeing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“But we need to go further. We will establish a long-term development programme for inspectors that helps them to support leaders’ well-being. We will publish our development roadmap for this in spring 2024.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 10 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Depersonalise inspection-report language and identify all persons responsible for a school in contextual information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. No headteacher should feel that the responsibility of an inspection and its outcome falls solely on their shoulders. In June 2023, we announced that we would look at depersonalising language used in inspection reports, the public-facing record of the inspection, so that we refer by default to ‘the school’ rather than to individuals. We also amended the contextual information within inspection reports to refer to all those with responsibility for a school. We implemented this change in September 2023.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 8 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Define when future learning reviews will be commissioned, who will conduct them, how they will operate, and how lessons will be disseminated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At the same time, we will define clearly the circumstances in which a learning review will be commissioned in future and the procedures to be followed.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 6 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a national helpline providing escalation to senior Ofsted staff for inspection concerns, including requests to pause inspections.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Coroner is correct that there has previously been no clear, written policy for pausing inspections. Every inspector and every school leader must have clarity about when and how to pause inspections. We also want to give leaders confidence that a request for a pause will not affect adversely the judgements made about a school. In response to our consultation on complaints about inspection, we introduced a new process for pausing inspection in December 2023, using a national helpline. We have since developed and published a national policy on pausing inspections (2c).”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 11 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to all Responsible Bodies, attach the Department’s and Ofsted’s responses, and set out system responsibilities and the Department’s support offer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The primary duty of care to school leaders rests with the employer – and that will be either a local authority, an academy trust or a governing board, and to provide support in fulfilling this role effectively, the Department will write to all Responsible Bodies, attaching this response to your Report, and that of Ofsted. We will set out”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 6 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure Regions Group officials know about expanded wellbeing support and proactively share it with Responsible Bodies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Within the Department, Regions Group will ensure all officials are aware of the expanded wellbeing support and will proactively share information about this with Responsible Bodies as part of our business as usual engagement with local authorities and academy trusts.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 6 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fund and expand professional supervision and counselling support for school and college leaders through Education Support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department is funding the charity, Education Support, to provide professional supervision and counselling to school and college leaders. Over 1,400 leaders have benefitted from the support so far and in June 2023, we announced the expansion of the programme, by doubling places for this year, so that more school leaders can have access to this valuable support. School and college leaders working in state funded schools and colleges can access support by visiting Education Support's website. This programme will end in March 2024 and will be replaced by a new programme.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Procure a new three-year professional supervision and counselling support package for school and college leaders from April 2024.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On 15 January 2024, the Department announced a new £1.5 million investment to procure a contractor to deliver a new three-year professional supervision and counselling support package for school and college leaders from April 2024. The new programme will have the capacity to support at least 2,500 leaders and will enable school and college leaders to continue to receive this valuable support. The”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and formalize a proactive Ofsted inspection challenge and staff-stress mitigation approach, including evidence-based challenge, risk identification and inspection feedback support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Brighter Futures for Children Ltd (on behalf of the Council) has consulted with Head Teachers regarding a more robust and proactive approach by responding to inspections on behalf of school leaders and Governors, through the termly meeting of Reading Headteachers (Friday 12 January 2024) and via the Reading school primary and secondary phase teacher associations (week commencing 15 January). The principle of the new approach is that Brighter Futures for Children will work with school leaders to understand any concerns regarding an inspection and offer to undertake challenge on a school’s behalf, before, during and after inspection, based on a robust evidence base. This builds on current practice which supports schools to consider”

Source location

Response from Reading Borough Council
Page 1 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver the endorsed headteacher wellbeing entitlement and support package, including coaching, mentoring or executive support alongside existing wellbeing services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Reading Borough Council is committed to promoting and supporting the welfare and mental health of all its staff including Head Teachers. Brighter Futures for Children undertook a Head Teacher wellbeing and mental health survey in May 2023. Findings from that survey and from Head Teachers’ performance management reviews have informed the development of a wellbeing entitlement offer and support package. The wellbeing entitlement offer, and support package was endorsed by the Education Partnership Board on 8 December 2023. The Head Teacher wellbeing and mental health survey will be repeated annually, and the survey will inform updates to the entitlement offer and support package. The wellbeing entitlement offer, and support package is being delivered in 3 strands:”

Source location

Response from Reading Borough Council
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Department for Education owns the support available to headteachers; Ofsted’s role is to promote awareness and uptake during inspections.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We recognise that the DfE has ownership of the support available to headteachers, but we do believe that our inspectorate can play a positive role in ensuring support is known about and taken up when necessary. We have engaged closely with the DfE on this and recognise that inspectors should be conversant with this support and ready to remind leaders that it is available. Through our ongoing inspector training, we will reinforce the expectation that they share this information with leaders at the beginning of an inspection. We will make sure that this information is contained within documents we share with providers on inspection. We will also use our other existing channels of communication to share information about the support available to leaders, which will not only help them but also increase their capacity to support the children in their care.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 20 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Primary responsibility for supporting school leaders rests with their employers: local authorities, academy trusts, or governing boards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“School leaders play a vitally important role, and it is the responsibility of all agencies – the Department, Ofsted, governing boards, local authorities and academy trusts to ensure that they receive the right support.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 6 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ofsted leads the response to inspection concerns outside the Department’s direct responsibilities, with the Department engaging on Ofsted’s changes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A series of changes to the inspection arrangements were announced in June 2023. These were an important start but, as evidenced by the Report, did not go far enough. Ofsted’s response to the Report, which DfE officials and I have discussed in detail with ████████, Ofsted’s new Chief Inspector, sets out fully the changes to inspection that were made prior to the inquest, and importantly, subsequently to the inquest. These include immediate steps taken pre-Christmas and the important inspector training that has taken place at the start of January 2024.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Final approval of HR policies on when independent learning reviews may be appropriate rests with the Council’s Personnel Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The intended outcome being that we have a policy or process to consider when an independent learning review might be appropriate. We intend to discuss this matter with Union colleagues and take a proposal through our normal channels of Union engagement. The final sign off for all such policies lies with the Council’s Personnel Committee which meets quarterly and is delegated to agree all such topics on behalf of the Council. This will be presented to Personnel Committee for agreement on 11th July 2024.”

Source location

Response from Reading Borough Council
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.34

  1. 1

    Publish explanatory safeguarding communications, including blogs and webinars, to clarify inspection changes and expectations.

    Stated by OfstedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  2. 2

    Implement revised complaints and post-inspection processes, including direct escalation to the Independent Complaints Adjudication Service.

    Stated by OfstedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  3. 3

    Examine whether schools with ineffective safeguarding but otherwise good performance should receive more time to improve before reporting.

    Stated by OfstedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  4. 4

    Operate a national safeguarding duty desk and require inspectors to seek its support on potentially ineffective safeguarding judgements.

    Stated by OfstedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  5. 5

    Consult on major inspection changes and implement agreed changes during the 2024/25 academic year.

    Stated by OfstedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  6. 6

    Improve communication to regulated sectors about safeguarding requirements and expectations.

    Stated by OfstedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  7. 7

    Consult on how to explain delays when complex inspection reports take longer than usual to publish.

    Stated by OfstedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  8. 8

    Create an expert reference group to challenge inspector training and wellbeing integration across the education inspection framework.

    Stated by OfstedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  9. 9

    Conduct the cross-sector Big Listen with independent expertise and publish its details, findings and resulting proposals.

    Stated by OfstedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  10. 10

    Allow schools to remedy minor administrative safeguarding issues during inspections before judgement.

    Stated by OfstedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  11. 11

    Work with representative organisations to clarify responsibilities and processes for raising and responding to leaders’ welfare concerns during inspections.

    Stated by OfstedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  12. 12

    Review quality-assurance processes to identify changes that could shorten the interval between inspection and report publication.

    Stated by OfstedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  13. 13

    Operate a rapid reinspection policy for otherwise good schools with safeguarding issues, enabling correction and potential grade improvement within three months.

    Stated by OfstedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  14. 14

    Brief inspectors and use sector communications to publicise leaders’ ability to share provisional outcomes and draft reports with appropriate supporters.

    Stated by OfstedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  15. 15

    Review intervention communications from Regions Group to make them more sensitive and acknowledge pressures on recipients.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  16. 16

    Create and promote the Education Staff Wellbeing Charter as a shared commitment to staff wellbeing.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  17. 17

    Monitor and continuously review the impact of the training and communications approach.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  18. 18

    Launch a call for evidence to identify where safeguarding guidance may need further changes.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  19. 19

    Continue promoting wellbeing support through Departmental networks and sector-led communication channels.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  20. 20

    Roll out difficult-conversation and distress-response training to relevant Education and Skills Funding Agency officials.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  21. 21

    Make planned technical safeguarding-guidance clarifications in September 2024 and fundamental changes in 2025.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  22. 22

    Publish resources addressing teacher workload, staff wellbeing and flexible working practices.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  23. 23

    Undertake further work on the tone and style of communications concerning legal matters, including termination warning notices.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  24. 24

    Continue exploring refinements to the regulatory approach to provide greater clarity for headteachers.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  25. 25

    Deliver training to Departmental Regions Group officials on managing difficult conversations and responding to signs of distress.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  26. 26

    Redouble efforts to minimise the information burden placed on school leaders during intervention communications.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  27. 27

    Review the regulatory approach to structural intervention for schools judged inadequate solely on safeguarding.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  28. 28

    Ask Responsible Bodies to ensure appropriate support is in place after an adverse inspection judgement.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  29. 29

    Review engagement and communication with schools facing potential or actual intervention to ensure greater sensitivity to school leaders’ welfare.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  30. 30

    Work with Ofsted through the Big Listen to examine options for further safeguarding inspection reform.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  31. 31

    Conduct the commissioned independent learning review, including finalizing its terms of reference and completing the review.

    Stated by Reading Borough CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  32. 32

    Develop and seek approval for HR policy provisions specifying when an independent learning review should be considered, following union engagement.

    Stated by Reading Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  33. 33

    Implement the Reading Borough-wide Parent Carer and Community Acceptable Behaviour Policy to support prevention of abuse to staff.

    Stated by Reading Borough CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2023.
  34. 34

    Repeat the headteacher wellbeing and mental health survey annually and use its findings to update the wellbeing entitlement and support package.

    Stated by Reading Borough CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 December 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish explanatory safeguarding communications, including blogs and webinars, to clarify inspection changes and expectations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. We understand the importance of being open and transparent about our practices so that leaders and teachers know and understand what to expect when we inspect them. We have published blogs and delivered webinars to explain the changes we made. Our webinar on ‘How Ofsted inspects safeguarding’ was presented live to 1,036 people in September 2023, with a further 7,007 individuals watching the recording on YouTube. Our safeguarding blog has also been read 6,000 times.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 8 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement revised complaints and post-inspection processes, including direct escalation to the Independent Complaints Adjudication Service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We know that some providers have found our complaints process difficult to navigate. From June 2023, we therefore consulted on changes to our complaints and post-inspection processes. We made four main proposals:”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 14 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Examine whether schools with ineffective safeguarding but otherwise good performance should receive more time to improve before reporting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. We will examine whether there are further changes we can make to give more time for improvement for a school with ineffective safeguarding but judged good or better in all other areas (school A). As above, the Big Listen will seek views from parents and professionals, with an agreed approach communicated through our response.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 9 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a national safeguarding duty desk and require inspectors to seek its support on potentially ineffective safeguarding judgements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. We know that providers have concerns about consistency of inspection practice across our workforce. To further support inspectors to be consistent in making safeguarding judgements, we introduced a national safeguarding duty desk in April 2023. Since that time, all inspectors have been required to call the duty desk number if their emerging safeguarding evidence could result in an ineffective judgement, to receive support and challenge. In autumn term 2023, calls were made in relation to 269 schools, with 17 of them ultimately judged ineffective². We delivered national training to inspectors in September 2023 on the changes we made, to reinforce these changes and promote consistency of practice.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 8 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult on major inspection changes and implement agreed changes during the 2024/25 academic year.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Where appropriate, we will instigate changes immediately. We will consult on any major changes that are announced through our response to the Big Listen and instigate changes during the 2024/25 academic year. We will aim to publish this consultation by September 2024.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 9 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Improve communication to regulated sectors about safeguarding requirements and expectations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. Finally, we will look carefully at how we can better inform the sectors we work across about the regulatory requirements in relation to safeguarding, including highlighting expectations set out in ‘Keeping children safe in education’.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 9 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consult on how to explain delays when complex inspection reports take longer than usual to publish.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. In some inspections, the complexity of the findings requires more time than the norm before an outcome is made public. We know the sector understands that these exceptional cases do occur from time to time. But we also know that the anticipation of a result from the school community can add to the pressure felt by leaders and staff. That is why, where reports do take longer to be published, we will endeavour to explain why. We will consult on how to do this through the Big Listen.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 18 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create an expert reference group to challenge inspector training and wellbeing integration across the education inspection framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Taken together, the training, policies and processes we are putting in place will ensure we are better equipped to deal with the exceptional occasions when a school leader is dealing with mental distress and an inspection needs to be paused. It is important that we act to build the profession’s confidence in our work. That is why we will create an expert reference group, to look at aspects of training and where well-being might be incorporated more explicitly across the education inspection framework. This group will provide constructive challenge to Ofsted, helping to drive constant improvement in our practices, and delivering better quality inspection for children and education staff. The group will feed directly into the Big Listen and will continue to support and challenge Ofsted as changes are made to the education inspection framework and its implementation (2a, 2b and 2c).”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 13 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct the cross-sector Big Listen with independent expertise and publish its details, findings and resulting proposals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“And in the weeks and months to come we will listen – to the professionals we work with and to the people we work for. As well as hearing from staff working in education and social care, the ‘Big Listen’ that I intend to launch shortly will hear from the parents, carers, children, young people and learners whom we serve.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Allow schools to remedy minor administrative safeguarding issues during inspections before judgement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The safety of children is our first priority. It is one of the first things we look at on inspection. We changed our handbooks in September 2023 to make it clear that providers have the opportunity to fix minor administrative issues while the inspection is ongoing. This is an important change that makes children safer and reassures teachers and leaders that easily fixable administrative errors will not adversely affect the outcome of their inspection.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 7 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with representative organisations to clarify responsibilities and processes for raising and responding to leaders’ welfare concerns during inspections.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Going further, we will work with the Confederation of School Trusts, the Association of Directors of Children’s Services, the Local Government Association and the National Governance Association to make sure that the roles, responsibilities and process for raising and responding to concerns about leaders’ welfare during an inspection are understood clearly by the inspection team and the responsible body.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 15 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review quality-assurance processes to identify changes that could shorten the interval between inspection and report publication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are now going further by carrying out a review of our quality assurance processes to see if we can shorten further the time between inspection and publication of the report. Our goal is to produce reports that leaders and parents agree are accurate and coherent, as quickly as possible.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 18 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a rapid reinspection policy for otherwise good schools with safeguarding issues, enabling correction and potential grade improvement within three months.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Where a school can correct safeguarding issues immediately, we give the school time to do this during the inspection before a judgement is made, so that fewer schools will be in the position of school A. Where the issues are more serious, but leaders have proven capacity to address these with the urgency needed, we have introduced the opportunity of a rapid reinspection within three months. This will allow the school to put matters right and have its grade changed swiftly.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 7 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Brief inspectors and use sector communications to publicise leaders’ ability to share provisional outcomes and draft reports with appropriate supporters.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We recognise that it is Ofsted’s responsibility to ensure that this is clear to leaders. We have already taken steps to do this by updating key documentation and briefing inspectors on this approach has already begun. We will make sure we share this message as widely as possible, both on inspection and through other channels of communication.”

Source location

Response from Ofsted
Page 16 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review intervention communications from Regions Group to make them more sensitive and acknowledge pressures on recipients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, Regions Group has reviewed the way it writes to schools and trusts which are eligible for intervention, to make sure communications are sensitive to recipients and acknowledge the pressures that they may be under. Regions Group will redouble its efforts to minimise burdens on school leaders in terms of the information it asks them to provide.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and promote the Education Staff Wellbeing Charter as a shared commitment to staff wellbeing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Broader staff wellbeing is crucial to our commitment to recruit and retain more teachers and support teacher quality. We are committed to promoting a whole-school approach to mental health and wellbeing, and to ensuring that staff wellbeing policy is integrated within schools’ culture. The Department has worked in partnership with the education sector and mental health experts to create the Education Staff Wellbeing Charter, which we are encouraging schools to sign up to as a shared commitment to promote staff wellbeing.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor and continuously review the impact of the training and communications approach.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The impact of the training and communications approach will be actively monitored and kept under continuous review. Further work is planned, for example, by Regions Group, on tone and style of communications relating to legal matters, including ‘termination warning notices’.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch a call for evidence to identify where safeguarding guidance may need further changes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have worked closely with Ofsted on the changes made to its handbooks so that inspection practice mirrors the duties and responsibilities placed on schools and colleges in the statutory safeguarding guidance, Keeping Children Safe In Education. We also supported Ofsted with the content for its webinars and blogs by identifying and agreeing the prevalent topics to be covered. We will be launching a call for evidence in the spring to build our knowledge base on where we need to consider”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue promoting wellbeing support through Departmental networks and sector-led communication channels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To increase awareness and take up on the programme, the Department and Education Support have worked with stakeholders, including the Local Government Association, National Government Association, and education unions, which has led to a significant increase in registrations. The Department will continue to promote the programme through our networks and sector led communication channels.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 6 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out difficult-conversation and distress-response training to relevant Education and Skills Funding Agency officials.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This training is also in the process of being rolled out to relevant officials in the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA), given the involvement of that Agency in intervention cases relating to financial matters, and the pressure a trust or school experiencing financial difficulty might feel.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make planned technical safeguarding-guidance clarifications in September 2024 and fundamental changes in 2025.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We plan to make small technical or points of clarification changes in September 2024 with any fundamental changes made in 2025.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish resources addressing teacher workload, staff wellbeing and flexible working practices.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also published a range of resources to help schools address teacher workload issues, prioritise staff wellbeing and support schools to introduce flexible working practices.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake further work on the tone and style of communications concerning legal matters, including termination warning notices.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The impact of the training and communications approach will be actively monitored and kept under continuous review. Further work is planned, for example, by Regions Group, on tone and style of communications relating to legal matters, including ‘termination warning notices’.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue exploring refinements to the regulatory approach to provide greater clarity for headteachers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department has reviewed its regulatory approach to structural intervention in schools in this position. In such a situation, the critical issue is to ensure that the safeguarding concerns are rapidly addressed. In particular, the timetable for intervention allows for reinspection to take place with a view to minimising burdens on school leaders. If the safeguarding issues are addressed at the point of the three month re-inspection, the process of intervention will not progress further. We will continue to explore opportunities to refine our regulatory approach in order to provide further clarity and reassurance to headteachers.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver training to Departmental Regions Group officials on managing difficult conversations and responding to signs of distress.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Training has been delivered to all officials in the Department’s Regions Group, which is responsible for interacting with schools’ Responsible Bodies, on how to manage difficult conversations, and thereafter any engagement officials have with school leaders. The training focuses on how to pick up on signs of distress and how to respond. It includes case studies to help officials understand the situations school leaders might face and the concerns they might have.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redouble efforts to minimise the information burden placed on school leaders during intervention communications.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, Regions Group has reviewed the way it writes to schools and trusts which are eligible for intervention, to make sure communications are sensitive to recipients and acknowledge the pressures that they may be under. Regions Group will redouble its efforts to minimise burdens on school leaders in terms of the information it asks them to provide.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the regulatory approach to structural intervention for schools judged inadequate solely on safeguarding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department has reviewed its regulatory approach to structural intervention in schools in this position. In such a situation, the critical issue is to ensure that the safeguarding concerns are rapidly addressed. In particular, the timetable for intervention allows for reinspection to take place with a view to minimising burdens on school leaders. If the safeguarding issues are addressed at the point of the three month re-inspection, the process of intervention will not progress further. We will continue to explore opportunities to refine our regulatory approach in order to provide further clarity and reassurance to headteachers.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ask Responsible Bodies to ensure appropriate support is in place after an adverse inspection judgement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Where a school faces an adverse inspection judgement, DfE officials will ask the Responsible Body of the school to ensure that appropriate support is in place to support the headteacher and broader school’s workforce.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 7 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review engagement and communication with schools facing potential or actual intervention to ensure greater sensitivity to school leaders’ welfare.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department accepts the need to take account of schools’ particular circumstances, and to prioritise headteacher welfare where schools are subject to adverse inspection judgements. We have reviewed the way we engage and communicate with schools in circumstances where intervention is being considered or implemented, with a view to making sure that all contact is undertaken sensitively and with full consideration of the possible impact on school leaders.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with Ofsted through the Big Listen to examine options for further safeguarding inspection reform.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will work with Ofsted through the Big Listen to examine options for further reform of the inspection arrangements around safeguarding. This will include considering whether safeguarding should be separated out from the leadership and management judgement, and other options to improve the inspection processes, including giving schools greater scope to improve safeguarding practice ahead of the inspection process concluding.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct the commissioned independent learning review, including finalizing its terms of reference and completing the review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the inquest, the Council confirmed that a learning review would be undertaken. The Council has commissioned an independent external reviewer to undertake the learning review. Two co-reviewers were appointed on 5 January 2024. The terms of reference for the review have been drafted and will be shared with Mrs Perry’s family before they are finalised. ████████ have been invited to meet with the reviewers to facilitate this. The review will take 12 weeks and is expected to conclude in April 2024. This addresses the commitment the Council made at the Inquest. As regards any future internal reviews, we recognise that, however rare, there may be exceptional circumstances where a staff member may be harmed in the course of their employment. This is a matter which we will seek to cover within our HR policies.”

Source location

Response from Reading Borough Council
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and seek approval for HR policy provisions specifying when an independent learning review should be considered, following union engagement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the inquest, the Council confirmed that a learning review would be undertaken. The Council has commissioned an independent external reviewer to undertake the learning review. Two co-reviewers were appointed on 5 January 2024. The terms of reference for the review have been drafted and will be shared with Mrs Perry’s family before they are finalised. ████████ have been invited to meet with the reviewers to facilitate this. The review will take 12 weeks and is expected to conclude in April 2024. This addresses the commitment the Council made at the Inquest. As regards any future internal reviews, we recognise that, however rare, there may be exceptional circumstances where a staff member may be harmed in the course of their employment. This is a matter which we will seek to cover within our HR policies.”

Source location

Response from Reading Borough Council
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Reading Borough-wide Parent Carer and Community Acceptable Behaviour Policy to support prevention of abuse to staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Community school leaders’ and Chairs of Governing Board’s weekly briefing on 19 January 2024 included a reminder of the mental health support available through the Employee Assistance Programme and confirmed that this new entitlement to coaching, mentoring or executive support was available. iii. Reading Borough Council School leaders at their termly meeting on 12 January were consulted on a proposed Reading Borough - wide Parent Carer and Community Acceptable Behaviour Policy which will be implemented in practice on 19th February 2024. This policy will complement a proposed Reading Borough Council Zero tolerance and prevention of abuse to staff policy, a draft of which went to Reading Borough Council’s Corporate Health and Safety Committee on 18 January 2024.”

Source location

Response from Reading Borough Council
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Repeat the headteacher wellbeing and mental health survey annually and use its findings to update the wellbeing entitlement and support package.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Reading Borough Council is committed to promoting and supporting the welfare and mental health of all its staff including Head Teachers. Brighter Futures for Children undertook a Head Teacher wellbeing and mental health survey in May 2023. Findings from that survey and from Head Teachers’ performance management reviews have informed the development of a wellbeing entitlement offer and support package. The wellbeing entitlement offer, and support package was endorsed by the Education Partnership Board on 8 December 2023. The Head Teacher wellbeing and mental health survey will be repeated annually, and the survey will inform updates to the entitlement offer and support package. The wellbeing entitlement offer, and support package is being delivered in 3 strands:”

Source location

Response from Reading Borough Council
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026