PFD report

Mr Tommy Faegh Faisali · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Jul 2015•Inner West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Use of staff without appropriate qualifications to provide expert psychiatric referral advice
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacityPart of recurring concern: Unsafe assignment of staff without the required qualifications or competence to care work
  2. Failure to communicate patient risks, including suicide risk, to other mental health team members
  3. Lack of continuity of care in team-based mental health care
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide continuity of patient care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use of staff without appropriate qualifications to provide expert psychiatric referral advice

Wider context from the report

“(1) That patients referred by their GP for second opinion from psychiatrists are not being seen by the same but rather by psychiatric health care staff with less qualification to diagnose and assess and recommend treatment then the GP who made the referral. (2) That a shortage of appropriately qualified doctors is being compensated for by staff without the appropriate qualifications to provide the expert advice being requested by GPs when they make psychiatric referrals. (3) Those patients may be at increased risk because of (1) and (2) above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity; Unsafe assignment of staff without the required qualifications or competence to care work.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate patient risks, including suicide risk, to other mental health team members

Wider context from the report

“(4) That staff within the mental health teams are not completing risk assessments or at least not appropriately documenting that they are. (5) That risks to patients, including risk of suicide is thus not appropriately communicated to other team members, thereby increasing the risks to those patients. (6) That risks arising from (5) are even more increased given the team approach to care and lack of continuity of care inherent in such ways of working. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of continuity of care in team-based mental health care

Wider context from the report

“(4) That staff within the mental health teams are not completing risk assessments or at least not appropriately documenting that they are. (5) That risks to patients, including risk of suicide is thus not appropriately communicated to other team members, thereby increasing the risks to those patients. (6) That risks arising from (5) are even more increased given the team approach to care and lack of continuity of care inherent in such ways of working. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide continuity of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete or appropriately document mental health team risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“(4) That staff within the mental health teams are not completing risk assessments or at least not appropriately documenting that they are. (5) That risks to patients, including risk of suicide is thus not appropriately communicated to other team members, thereby increasing the risks to those patients. (6) That risks arising from (5) are even more increased given the team approach to care and lack of continuity of care inherent in such ways of working. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate mental health risk assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure that psychiatric second-opinion referrals are assessed by appropriately qualified psychiatrists

Wider context from the report

“(1) That patients referred by their GP for second opinion from psychiatrists are not being seen by the same but rather by psychiatric health care staff with less qualification to diagnose and assess and recommend treatment then the GP who made the referral. (2) That a shortage of appropriately qualified doctors is being compensated for by staff without the appropriate qualifications to provide the expert advice being requested by GPs when they make psychiatric referrals. (3) Those patients may be at increased risk because of (1) and (2) above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical second-opinion processes; Unsafe assignment of staff without the required qualifications or competence to care work.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.