PFD report

Joan Lilian Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Oct 2016•Central Lincolnshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Hazardous junction for vehicles turning across southbound traffic
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls at high-risk road junctions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Complete a highway safety investigation of collisions between Toll Bar Road and Gonerby Moor to identify cost-effective remedial measures.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 October 2016.
  2. Action

    Complete a highway investigation following the fatal collision at the A1 and Toll Bar Road junction.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 October 2016.
  3. Action

    Submit any remedial actions identified by the investigation in a funding bid.

    Stated by National HighwaysStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 October 2016.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The initial investigation found no apparent highway-related factors contributing to the collision.

    Stated by National HighwaysDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hazardous junction for vehicles turning across southbound traffic

Wider context from the report

“(III)     I received evidence that in order to assess the likely time taken by the Audi to cross the junction, in the days following this incident, the investigating officer carried out covert surveillance at the junction. During the period of that surveillance, of approximately one hour, he recorded one “near miss” in circumstances identical to the index accident and two further “near miss” incidents. The officer also reported that he observed an HGV waiting for a period of in excess of six minutes prior being able to turn safely across southbound traffic into Toll Bar Road. (IV)     I received evidence that whilst there were no defects with the road which could be classed as contributory to this collision, the nature of the junction may have been a contributory factor. It was described as “challenging”. I was told that since 1985 there had been 4 other fatal road traffic collisions at this junction, two of which involved vehicles turning across Southbound traffic. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls at high-risk road junctions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a highway safety investigation of collisions between Toll Bar Road and Gonerby Moor to identify cost-effective remedial measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The latest KSI Review which is about to be completed, has identified the A1 near Toll Bar Road as a site that requires prioritisation for closer investigation following the fatal”

Source location

2016-0383-Response-by-Highways-England
Page 1 · response
Published 24 October 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete a highway investigation following the fatal collision at the A1 and Toll Bar Road junction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following every fatal road traffic collision in the East Midlands Highways England conduct an investigation. The purpose of this investigation is to gather information pertaining to the highway and its environs and to review the collision history at the fatal collision site. An investigation was completed in May 2015 following this collision which I have attached in this response to you. The report concludes that from the initial investigation there does not appear to be any highway related factors.”

Source location

2016-0383-Response-by-Highways-England
Page 1 · response
Published 24 October 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit any remedial actions identified by the investigation in a funding bid.

Verbatim wording from the response

“collision involving Mrs Green. A study will be completed during the New Year and will consider all collisions that have occurred between Toll Bar Road and Gonerby Moor. The aim of the study will be to identify cost effective remedial measures to reduce or prevent further personal injury collisions in this area. These measures can involve engineering, education or enforcement alongside our colleagues in Lincolnshire Road Safety Partnership. Any action identified following this study will then be added to a bid for funding submitted in the Spring / Summer.”

Source location

2016-0383-Response-by-Highways-England
Page 2 · response
Published 24 October 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The initial investigation found no apparent highway-related factors contributing to the collision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following every fatal road traffic collision in the East Midlands Highways England conduct an investigation. The purpose of this investigation is to gather information pertaining to the highway and its environs and to review the collision history at the fatal collision site. An investigation was completed in May 2015 following this collision which I have attached in this response to you. The report concludes that from the initial investigation there does not appear to be any highway related factors.”

Source location

2016-0383-Response-by-Highways-England
Page 1 · response
Published 24 October 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Toll Bar Road junction is likely not among the network’s 50 junctions with the most personal injury collisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Toll Bar Road junction itself is likely to remain outside the Top 50 Problem Junctions in the latest Top 50 review.”

Source location

2016-0383-Response-by-Highways-England
Page 2 · response
Published 24 October 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026