PFD report

DAVID ARTHUR SHARP BATEMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 21 May 2025•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide adequate nursing care and treatment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Undertake regular peer reviews and audits of nutrition care, including the frequency and quality of MUST assessments.

    Stated by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (UHPStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide adequate nursing care and treatment

Wider context from the report

“1. The finding of poor nursing care and treatment that was possibly causative of Dave’s death and the evidence of the treating consultant that such poor care raised a mortality risk for other patients. 2. There was no evidence before the court that these concerns have been addressed and remedied. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake regular peer reviews and audits of nutrition care, including the frequency and quality of MUST assessments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1 | Regular audit/peer review of nutrition care, including the frequency and quality of MUST assessments should be undertaken as part of the peer review programme. | Director of Nursing | 31st August 2025 (first peer review, with ongoing peer reviews to become business as usual)”

Source location

Response from NHS University Hospitals Trust Plymouth
Page 6 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Provide Matrons Safety Huddle education on measuring mid-upper arm circumference and estimating patients’ weight.

    Stated by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (UHPStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.
  2. 2

    Share investigation findings and guidance on alternative weight-estimation interventions across the Trust through the Harm Free Care and Nutritional Steering groups.

    Stated by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (UHPStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 May 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Matrons Safety Huddle education on measuring mid-upper arm circumference and estimating patients’ weight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2 | Education session to be provided on how to measure the mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and estimate a patient's weight at the Matrons Safety Huddle. | Director of Nursing | 31st August 2025”

Source location

Response from NHS University Hospitals Trust Plymouth
Page 6 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share investigation findings and guidance on alternative weight-estimation interventions across the Trust through the Harm Free Care and Nutritional Steering groups.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3 | Findings from this investigation, including the importance of considering alternative interventions to estimate a patient's weight when a weight cannot be acquired to be shared across the organisation at the Trusts Harm Free care group and Nutritional Steering group | Director of Nursing | 31st August 2025”

Source location

Response from NHS University Hospitals Trust Plymouth
Page 6 · response
Published 22 May 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026