PFD report

Joseph Francis De Pellegrino-Farrugia · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Jul 2017•North Yorkshire (West)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of chair sensors to detect a foot in the mechanism
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls for riser-recliner chairs
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Fit sensor strips or protective screens beneath chair sides and backs where entrapment risk is identified.

    Stated by AJ Way Co LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 July 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Protective sensors are added only when retailers order them after identifying an entrapment risk.

    Stated by AJ Way Co LtdRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of chair sensors to detect a foot in the mechanism

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was heard to the effect that the chair was not fitted with sensors which would have detected the presence of the foot in the mechanism to prevent the crushing injury and to release the foot. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety controls for riser-recliner chairs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fit sensor strips or protective screens beneath chair sides and backs where entrapment risk is identified.

Verbatim wording from the response

“AJ Ways can and do fit a sensor strips or a protective screen to the underside of the side and back of the chair to avoid accidental trapping. These are not a mandatory attachment and therefore are only added to the chair in response to orders placed by the retailer who sells the chair to a consumer who identifies that there may be a risk of entrapment to small children and animals.”

Source location

2017-0430-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 3 July 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Protective sensors are added only when retailers order them after identifying an entrapment risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“AJ Ways can and do fit a sensor strips or a protective screen to the underside of the side and back of the chair to avoid accidental trapping. These are not a mandatory attachment and therefore are only added to the chair in response to orders placed by the retailer who sells the chair to a consumer who identifies that there may be a risk of entrapment to small children and animals.”

Source location

2017-0430-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 3 July 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Sensors are unsuitable for front legrest entrapment because the legrest flexes, so they cannot address the accident mechanism.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having looked at the evidence presented on how this accident happened I can see that the entrapment occurred at the front of the chair underneath the legrest, the sensors that are used are not suitable for this part of the chair due to the fact that the legrest flexes hence highlighting this in the user instructions.”

Source location

2017-0430-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 3 July 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Include a user instruction booklet with every delivered chair, covering suitability, entrapment risks, obstruction checks and hazard-sensor limitations.

    Stated by AJ Way Co LtdStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 July 2017.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include a user instruction booklet with every delivered chair, covering suitability, entrapment risks, obstruction checks and hazard-sensor limitations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To assist in the investigation I have enclosed a copy of the User Instruction booklet which is included with every chair delivered, I think there are several areas of relevance to the suitability and risk analysis for the use of an AJ Way riser recliner that may be important to consider, notably:”

Source location

2017-0430-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 3 July 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026