PFD report

Barbara HOLLIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Oct 2022•Norfolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Unavailability of emergency ambulances during periods of high service demand
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance attendancePart of recurring concern: Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls
  2. Failure to follow the correct emergency response pathway
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Establish a clinician escalation process for delayed inter-facility transfers, including clinical review, CAD documentation, prioritisation decisions and communication with requesting clinicians.

    Stated by Spire HealthcareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Continue considering options to improve timely patient transfers, including liaison with private ambulance providers and national-level solution development.

    Stated by Spire HealthcareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 October 2022.
  3. Action

    Maintain the Norfolk D1 system call place with stakeholders to discuss lengthy hospital handover delays and interim measures.

    Stated by East of England Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of emergency ambulances during periods of high service demand

Wider context from the report

“4. There were no emergency ambulances to respond to the initial 999 call due to high demand on the service 5. It is accepted that EEAST have taken several steps following the increase in call demand and subsequent delays in responding to patients. However, evidence was heard that it will take up to a year to see if these steps are effective. In the meantime, there is concern that future deaths will occur ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance attendance; Insufficient ambulance service capacity for emergency calls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow the correct emergency response pathway

Wider context from the report

“1. EEAST were telephoned at 19.51 hours and the caller said that immediate intervention was needed. The incorrect pathway was then followed and it is understood action has been taken in this respect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a clinician escalation process for delayed inter-facility transfers, including clinical review, CAD documentation, prioritisation decisions and communication with requesting clinicians.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I met with ████████, Patient Safety Officer (EEAST) and ████████, Control Room Lead (EEAST) on the 13th October 2022 to discuss options to improve ambulance response times for inter-provider transfers. We discussed the pressure facing the ambulance service at this time in great detail and ████████ took the time to explain that it would not be possible to provide any assurance regarding ambulance response times or to agree an early notification or booking service as you had suggested, due to the requirement to manage demand through the existing triage and prioritisation system. However, we did acknowledge that the ability to have a clinician to clinician discussion, where Spire senior nursing or medical staff can speak to a clinical lead within EEAST would enable detailed information to be provided regarding the rationale for transfer and patient condition.”

Source location

Response from Spire Norwich Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue considering options to improve timely patient transfers, including liaison with private ambulance providers and national-level solution development.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We continue to consider other options to support timely transfer of patients, including liaison with private ambulance providers. The challenges with ambulance transfer delays have been reported to Spire Healthcare’s Executive committee and we are being supported to seek solutions to this challenge at a national level.”

Source location

Response from Spire Norwich Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain the Norfolk D1 system call place with stakeholders to discuss lengthy hospital handover delays and interim measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At a local level, the Trust has a number of ongoing actions in Norfolk aimed at addressing the handover delays. D1 system call place has been between EEAST, and other stakeholders, chaired by the ICB (Integrated Care Board) and respective hospitals and discuss any lengthy delays and interims where that need to be put in place. The ‘Category 1 drop and go’ and ‘Category 2 rapid release’ projects are also in place although these are not always available at the acute due to capacity.”

Source location

Response from East of England Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue regular executive-level escalation to address worsening hospital handover delays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To highlight the nature of the handover delays, last month we lost 6295 hours of ambulance time outside hospitals in Norfolk waiting to handover, after the 15-minute handover period (i.e., not including that time). This does not account for the hours spent ‘cohorting’ patients, nor the lost manager time supporting this. This can be seen the effect on our C2 response time is hugely significant and correlates directly with delayed handovers. Escalations continue to take place regularly at executive level to try and ease this situation, but the trend nevertheless is still currently worsening.”

Source location

Response from East of England Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the current delay action plan.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is working hard with our system partners across the region to ensure that our patients are safe during this challenging period. Like all other ambulance trusts, we are also working with the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) to continue to escalate our concerns. I have attached our current delay action plan that has recently been reviewed.”

Source location

Response from East of England Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the Category 1 drop-and-go process so crews waiting at hospital can respond to Category 1 calls immediately.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At a local level, the Trust has a number of ongoing actions in Norfolk aimed at addressing the handover delays. D1 system call place has been between EEAST, and other stakeholders, chaired by the ICB (Integrated Care Board) and respective hospitals and discuss any lengthy delays and interims where that need to be put in place. The ‘Category 1 drop and go’ and ‘Category 2 rapid release’ projects are also in place although these are not always available at the acute due to capacity.”

Source location

Response from East of England Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the Category 2 rapid-release programme to enable eligible crews to hand over patients within 10 minutes and respond to Category 2 calls.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At a local level, the Trust has a number of ongoing actions in Norfolk aimed at addressing the handover delays. D1 system call place has been between EEAST, and other stakeholders, chaired by the ICB (Integrated Care Board) and respective hospitals and discuss any lengthy delays and interims where that need to be put in place. The ‘Category 1 drop and go’ and ‘Category 2 rapid release’ projects are also in place although these are not always available at the acute due to capacity.”

Source location

Response from East of England Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Add critical-care limitation and emergency transfer information to patient admission letters.

    Stated by Spire HealthcareStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 October 2022.
  2. 2

    Work with regional system partners to maintain patient safety during periods of challenging ambulance demand.

    Stated by East of England Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 October 2022.
  3. 3

    Share the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives briefing on hospital handover delays and delayed ambulance responses with the coroner’s office.

    Stated by East of England Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 October 2022.
  4. 4

    Continue escalating ambulance handover-delay concerns with the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch.

    Stated by East of England Ambulance Service NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 October 2022.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Ambulance response-time assurances and early-notification or booking services cannot be provided because demand must be managed through existing triage and prioritisation.

    Stated by Spire HealthcareUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add critical-care limitation and emergency transfer information to patient admission letters.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Ensure all patients admitted to Spire Norwich Hospital are aware that the hospital does not have an on-site critical care unit”

Source location

Response from Spire Norwich Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with regional system partners to maintain patient safety during periods of challenging ambulance demand.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is working hard with our system partners across the region to ensure that our patients are safe during this challenging period. Like all other ambulance trusts, we are also working with the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) to continue to escalate our concerns. I have attached our current delay action plan that has recently been reviewed.”

Source location

Response from East of England Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives briefing on hospital handover delays and delayed ambulance responses with the coroner’s office.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) released a briefing for HM Coroners in relation to hospital handover delays and delayed ambulance responses to 999 calls and this was shared with your office on 30 August 2022. I have also attached a copy for your information.”

Source location

Response from East of England Ambulance Service
Page 2 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue escalating ambulance handover-delay concerns with the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust is working hard with our system partners across the region to ensure that our patients are safe during this challenging period. Like all other ambulance trusts, we are also working with the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) to continue to escalate our concerns. I have attached our current delay action plan that has recently been reviewed.”

Source location

Response from East of England Ambulance Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ambulance response-time assurances and early-notification or booking services cannot be provided because demand must be managed through existing triage and prioritisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I met with ████████, Patient Safety Officer (EEAST) and ████████, Control Room Lead (EEAST) on the 13th October 2022 to discuss options to improve ambulance response times for inter-provider transfers. We discussed the pressure facing the ambulance service at this time in great detail and ████████ took the time to explain that it would not be possible to provide any assurance regarding ambulance response times or to agree an early notification or booking service as you had suggested, due to the requirement to manage demand through the existing triage and prioritisation system. However, we did acknowledge that the ability to have a clinician to clinician discussion, where Spire senior nursing or medical staff can speak to a clinical lead within EEAST would enable detailed information to be provided regarding the rationale for transfer and patient condition.”

Source location

Response from Spire Norwich Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 3 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026