Robert Gordon John Hogg · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Aug 2015•Buckinghamshire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of NHS Pathways toddler/child pathways to identify very sick children
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable NHS 111 clinical triage algorithms and systems

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. NHS Pathways

    Continue reviewing clinical content and system architecture for safe identification of paediatric sepsis.

  2. NHS Pathways

    Amend the system to advise regularly checking unwell children overnight.

  3. NHS Pathways

    Enhance training materials to support safer identification and management of paediatric sepsis.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Department of Health and Social Care

    Responsibility for the NHS Pathways system rests with HSCIC, which has provided the relevant response.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. NHS Pathways

    No similar toddler or child cases were notified to NHS Pathways by SCAS for investigation.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  3. NHS Pathways

    The NHS Pathways system was not attributable to the death; the initial triage was appropriate and a later call breached procedure.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  4. NHS Pathways

    There are no grounds or sufficient evidence that the toddler and child pathways fail to identify very sick children.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of NHS Pathways toddler/child pathways to identify very sick children

Wider context from the report

“(2) The third area of concern stated specifically “NHS Pathways toddler/child Pathways are not necessarily highlighting/picking up very sick children. This is not the first event relating to incidents involving toddlers/children and this has been highlighted through our own Pathways Lead to NHS Pathways for investigation” (3) The evidence given by ████████ during the Inquest was that no changes have been made to the toddler/child pathways, and that the third area of concern identified in the Investigation Report is a continuing risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable NHS 111 clinical triage algorithms and systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing clinical content and system architecture for safe identification of paediatric sepsis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However as a learning system, and as a consequence of this document, NHS Pathways did amend the system, and is continuing to review the clinical content and architecture in regards to safe identification of cases of paediatric sepsis.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the system to advise regularly checking unwell children overnight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However as a learning system, and as a consequence of this document, NHS Pathways did amend the system, and is continuing to review the clinical content and architecture in regards to safe identification of cases of paediatric sepsis.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enhance training materials to support safer identification and management of paediatric sepsis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However as a learning system, and as a consequence of this document, NHS Pathways did amend the system, and is continuing to review the clinical content and architecture in regards to safe identification of cases of paediatric sepsis.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for the NHS Pathways system rests with HSCIC, which has provided the relevant response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) is the national provider of information, data and IT systems for commissioners, analysts and clinicians in health and social care. HSCIC is an executive non-departmental public body and is responsible for the NHS Pathways system. NHS Pathways has provided a response which I am enclosing.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No similar toddler or child cases were notified to NHS Pathways by SCAS for investigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

““This is not the first event relating to incidents involving toddlers/children and this has been highlighted through our own Pathways Lead to NHS Pathways for investigation.””

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The NHS Pathways system was not attributable to the death; the initial triage was appropriate and a later call breached procedure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From the timeline above, and as is detailed in Suzanne Solera’s report (IR 4865) the case was appropriately assessed at the time of the initial triage.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 3 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There are no grounds or sufficient evidence that the toddler and child pathways fail to identify very sick children.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. NHS Pathways toddler/child pathways are not necessarily highlighting/picking up very sick children.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 3 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026