PFD report

Robert Gordon John Hogg · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Aug 2015•Buckinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure of NHS Pathways toddler/child pathways to identify very sick children
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable NHS 111 clinical triage algorithms and systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Continue reviewing clinical content and system architecture for safe identification of paediatric sepsis.

    Stated by NHS PathwaysStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 August 2015.
  2. Action

    Amend the system to advise regularly checking unwell children overnight.

    Stated by NHS PathwaysStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 August 2015.
  3. Action

    Enhance training materials to support safer identification and management of paediatric sepsis.

    Stated by NHS PathwaysStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 August 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Responsibility for the NHS Pathways system rests with HSCIC, which has provided the relevant response.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of NHS Pathways toddler/child pathways to identify very sick children

Wider context from the report

“(2) The third area of concern stated specifically “NHS Pathways toddler/child Pathways are not necessarily highlighting/picking up very sick children. This is not the first event relating to incidents involving toddlers/children and this has been highlighted through our own Pathways Lead to NHS Pathways for investigation” (3) The evidence given by ████████ during the Inquest was that no changes have been made to the toddler/child pathways, and that the third area of concern identified in the Investigation Report is a continuing risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable NHS 111 clinical triage algorithms and systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing clinical content and system architecture for safe identification of paediatric sepsis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However as a learning system, and as a consequence of this document, NHS Pathways did amend the system, and is continuing to review the clinical content and architecture in regards to safe identification of cases of paediatric sepsis.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the system to advise regularly checking unwell children overnight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However as a learning system, and as a consequence of this document, NHS Pathways did amend the system, and is continuing to review the clinical content and architecture in regards to safe identification of cases of paediatric sepsis.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enhance training materials to support safer identification and management of paediatric sepsis.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However as a learning system, and as a consequence of this document, NHS Pathways did amend the system, and is continuing to review the clinical content and architecture in regards to safe identification of cases of paediatric sepsis.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for the NHS Pathways system rests with HSCIC, which has provided the relevant response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) is the national provider of information, data and IT systems for commissioners, analysts and clinicians in health and social care. HSCIC is an executive non-departmental public body and is responsible for the NHS Pathways system. NHS Pathways has provided a response which I am enclosing.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There are no grounds or sufficient evidence that the toddler and child pathways fail to identify very sick children.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. NHS Pathways toddler/child pathways are not necessarily highlighting/picking up very sick children.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 3 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    No similar toddler or child cases were notified to NHS Pathways by SCAS for investigation.

    Stated by NHS PathwaysDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. 2

    The NHS Pathways system was not attributable to the death; the initial triage was appropriate and a later call breached procedure.

    Stated by NHS PathwaysDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

No similar toddler or child cases were notified to NHS Pathways by SCAS for investigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

““This is not the first event relating to incidents involving toddlers/children and this has been highlighted through our own Pathways Lead to NHS Pathways for investigation.””

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 2 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The NHS Pathways system was not attributable to the death; the initial triage was appropriate and a later call breached procedure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From the timeline above, and as is detailed in Suzanne Solera’s report (IR 4865) the case was appropriately assessed at the time of the initial triage.”

Source location

2015-0313-Response-by-NHS-Pathways
Page 3 · response
Published 6 August 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026