PFD report

Sarah McGarrigle · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Nov 2021•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
18

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to conduct capacity assessments using communicated information and a longitudinal assessment of community self-neglect risks
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to make capacity-based decisions using relevant information and wishesPart of recurring concern: Failure to recognise impaired decision-making capacity in care decisions
  2. Failure to incorporate relevant collateral information and community history in mental disorder assessments
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to incorporate relevant clinical history and diagnoses into care decisionsPart of recurring concern: Failure to obtain relevant collateral information from family and social supportsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable gathering and use of collateral information in mental health assessments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.11

  1. Action

    Design a Mental Capacity Act audit.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Share the Regulation 28 response with the Aspen Ward consultant psychiatrists’ responsible officer.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  3. Action

    Introduce a process for arranging and facilitating discharge-planning and ward-round meetings.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The MDT found no acute mental illness or immediate risk and considered an inpatient mental health ward inappropriate for ongoing alcohol-dependence support.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct capacity assessments using communicated information and a longitudinal assessment of community self-neglect risks

Wider context from the report

“(2) That the Consultant Psychiatrists who reviewed the Deceased on Aspen Ward made the assumption that concern about the Deceased’s capacity was raised in the context of her withdrawal from alcohol. Consideration of the information that had been communicated to Aspen Ward (which included the specific limb of the capacity test that was in doubt) and a more longitudinal approach to the assessment would have shown that the concern related to the far more complex picture that the Deceased presented in the community and management of risks associated with self-neglect. This was not addressed by those responsible for assessing the Deceased on Aspen Ward. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to make capacity-based decisions using relevant information and wishes; Failure to recognise impaired decision-making capacity in care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to incorporate relevant collateral information and community history in mental disorder assessments

Wider context from the report

“(1) That the clinicians on Aspen Ward did not consider relevant information provided to the ward by the allocated social worker and the AMHP in the assessment of the Deceased’s mental disorder. The was an over-reliance on Sarah’s presentation on the ward and insufficient consideration given to the concerns that had been raised by community agencies, her psychiatric history and behaviours in the community setting. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to incorporate relevant clinical history and diagnoses into care decisions; Failure to obtain relevant collateral information from family and social supports; Unreliable gathering and use of collateral information in mental health assessments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design a Mental Capacity Act audit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The PCFT safeguarding team are designing a Mental Capacity Act audit.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the Regulation 28 response with the Aspen Ward consultant psychiatrists’ responsible officer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The concerns identified during the inquest have been reviewed by Professor Nihal Fernando, PCFT’s Executive Medical Director. Professor Fernando will share a copy of PCFT’s Regulation 28 response with the Aspen ward consultant Psychiatrists Responsible Officer, in his new Trust.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a process for arranging and facilitating discharge-planning and ward-round meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████o reduce the likelihood of similar incidents occurring in the future, the PCFT Oldham Triumvirate Leadership Team have held several meetings to renew the discharge process on its inpatient adult acute mental health wards. A number of ████████tions to improve the quality of discharges have been taken, which include:”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement PARIS across inpatient mental health wards, including a mental-capacity assessment documentation template.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• PCFT has successfully implemented PARIS in all its inpatient mental health wards. This electronic patient record system includes a mental capacity assessment template that clinicians can use to document their assessments.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission Mental Capacity Act training for all clinicians.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is evidence the Aspen Ward MDT considered Sarah’s mental capacity to make decisions about drinking alcohol, the risks associated with, however the Aspen Ward MDT did not complete and document a formal mental capacity assessment. This area of practice that required improvement had been identified in a PCFT investigation completed after Sarah’s death (but before Sarah’s inquest). Several actions have been taken since the time of Sarah’s admission to Aspen Ward which improve how inpatient wards consider and apply the mental capacity act in practice:”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Escalate the need for additional longitudinal mental-capacity education to the Safeguarding Team and Mental Health Law and Scrutiny Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The learning from Sarah s Inquest regarding a potential missed opportunity for clinicians to consider a more longitudinal approach to assessing mental capacity assessments has been shared with senior Consultant Psychiatrists in Oldham. There was some agreement that additional education in this area could be beneficial. This will be escalated to the PCFT Safeguarding Team and the Mental Health Law and Scrutiny Group.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recommend that the Oldham Safeguarding Adult Partnership Board develop a multi-agency mental-capacity protocol.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• PCFT’s Head of Safeguarding and the Named Professional for Safeguarding Adults will make a recommendation to the Oldham Safeguarding Adult Partnership Board that a multi-agency protocol be developed. The recommended protocol would outline the roles and responsibilities of each agency when assessing mental capacity for complex patients with a mixture of health and social care needs. The guidance would also outline how multi-agency partners can request specialist mental health input for a mental capacity assessment.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mental-capacity lunch-and-learn sessions in Oldham.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████commissioned Mental Capacity Act training for all clinicians. ████████arding team have delivered lunch and learn sessions on mental capacity in Oldham.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide Oldham mental health services with a referral route to the multi-agency Adults with Multiple Complex Needs Meeting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Oldham's mental health services now have a route to refer patients to the Oldham multi-agency Adults with Multiple Complex Needs Meeting. This ████████to support professionals to work with complex patients who present with high levels of risk but are assessed as having the mental capacity to make unwise decisions or do not engage with their care and treatment.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share inquest learning about longitudinal mental-capacity assessment with senior Oldham consultant psychiatrists.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The learning from Sarah s Inquest regarding a potential missed opportunity for clinicians to consider a more longitudinal approach to assessing mental capacity assessments has been shared with senior Consultant Psychiatrists in Oldham. There was some agreement that additional education in this area could be beneficial. This will be escalated to the PCFT Safeguarding Team and the Mental Health Law and Scrutiny Group.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce an inpatient–community interface meeting to improve discharge-planning information sharing and communication.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████o reduce the likelihood of similar incidents occurring in the future, the PCFT Oldham Triumvirate Leadership Team have held several meetings to renew the discharge process on its inpatient adult acute mental health wards. A number of ████████tions to improve the quality of discharges have been taken, which include:”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The MDT found no acute mental illness or immediate risk and considered an inpatient mental health ward inappropriate for ongoing alcohol-dependence support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“physical symptoms of withdrawal. On admission to Aspen Ward, she was not experiencing any alcohol-related behavioural issues. It is widely accepted that alcohol use can cause or increase symptoms of behavioural and/or mental illness. For some patients, when they stop alcohol, their symptoms can significantly improve or stop all together. Sarah’s overall presentation from the time she was assessed and detained under the MHA in the Royal Oldham Acute Hospital, compared to while an inpatient on Aspen was significantly better. Sarah appeared to improve in the time between being detained under Section 2 and being transferred to Aspen Ward (which was a period of several days). Sarah had been safely using leave off the medical wards for a cigarette break. While on Aspen Ward, she also used leave off the ward for cigarettes.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Establish the Named Professional for Safeguarding Adults as a source of clinical support and guidance and participant in safeguarding forums.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  2. 2

    Distribute the Oldham Adults Safeguarding Board Self-Neglect toolkit and facilitate learning sessions in Oldham.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  3. 3

    Hold a task-and-finish group to review discharge actions and plan ongoing improvements.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  4. 4

    Submit chronologies, reports and learning to the Safeguarding Adult Review process.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  5. 5

    Continue engaging with the Safeguarding Adult Review process as required.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  6. 6

    Complete the internal investigation and submit its report to the coroner.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 6 October 2022.
  7. 7

    Reiterate safe-discharge requirements to inpatient multidisciplinary teams.

    Stated by Pennine Care NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 6 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish the Named Professional for Safeguarding Adults as a source of clinical support and guidance and participant in safeguarding forums.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• PCFT’s Named Professional for Safeguarding Adults is now a high-profile source of support and guidance that clinicians can contact. The Named Professional is also an active member in the Oldham multi-agency safeguarding forums.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Distribute the Oldham Adults Safeguarding Board Self-Neglect toolkit and facilitate learning sessions in Oldham.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Oldham Adults Safeguarding Board Self-Neglect toolkit has been distributed, and some learning sessions have been facilitated in Oldham.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hold a task-and-finish group to review discharge actions and plan ongoing improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A task and finish group is planned for January 2022 to review the actions so far and plan for ongoing improvements. This will include senior Consultant Psychiatrists and managers.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit chronologies, reports and learning to the Safeguarding Adult Review process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• PCFT have also been engaged in the Oldham Safeguarding Adult Review process led by the Safeguarding Adults Partnership Board. PCFT have submitted chronologies, reports and the learning identified after the initial review of this incident. PCFT will continue to engage with the SAR process as required.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue engaging with the Safeguarding Adult Review process as required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• PCFT have also been engaged in the Oldham Safeguarding Adult Review process led by the Safeguarding Adults Partnership Board. PCFT have submitted chronologies, reports and the learning identified after the initial review of this incident. PCFT will continue to engage with the SAR process as required.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the internal investigation and submit its report to the coroner.

Verbatim wording from the response

“PCFT’s Internal Investigation Report The target date for completion of PCFT’s internal investigation is 21/01/22 and will be submitted to you in due course.”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reiterate safe-discharge requirements to inpatient multidisciplinary teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“████████o reduce the likelihood of similar incidents occurring in the future, the PCFT Oldham Triumvirate Leadership Team have held several meetings to renew the discharge process on its inpatient adult acute mental health wards. A number of ████████tions to improve the quality of discharges have been taken, which include:”

Source location

Response from NHS Pennine Care Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 6 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026