PFD report

Anthony Cleon GRANT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Nov 2017•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Unavailability of a motion early warning system for poolside surveillance
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools
  2. Failure to change lifeguard positions at planned intervals
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming poolsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable lifeguard provision for aquatic safety
  3. Insufficient poolside lifeguard staffing
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of a motion early warning system for poolside surveillance

Wider context from the report

“Mr Grant drifted under the water and remained submerged for five minutes and 41 seconds before a member of the public noticed him and alerted a lifeguard. The lifeguard had been on duty poolside throughout. Quite apart from the actions of an individual lifeguard, there are many ways that pool safety could have been approached differently that day. The lifeguards could have changed position after half an hour or an hour as had been intended. There could have been more than one lifeguard on poolside. The lifeguards could have been supported by a motion early warning system. These are all matters for the industry to explore. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to change lifeguard positions at planned intervals

Wider context from the report

“Mr Grant drifted under the water and remained submerged for five minutes and 41 seconds before a member of the public noticed him and alerted a lifeguard. The lifeguard had been on duty poolside throughout. Quite apart from the actions of an individual lifeguard, there are many ways that pool safety could have been approached differently that day. The lifeguards could have changed position after half an hour or an hour as had been intended. There could have been more than one lifeguard on poolside. The lifeguards could have been supported by a motion early warning system. These are all matters for the industry to explore. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools; Unreliable lifeguard provision for aquatic safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient poolside lifeguard staffing

Wider context from the report

“Mr Grant drifted under the water and remained submerged for five minutes and 41 seconds before a member of the public noticed him and alerted a lifeguard. The lifeguard had been on duty poolside throughout. Quite apart from the actions of an individual lifeguard, there are many ways that pool safety could have been approached differently that day. The lifeguards could have changed position after half an hour or an hour as had been intended. There could have been more than one lifeguard on poolside. The lifeguards could have been supported by a motion early warning system. These are all matters for the industry to explore. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for drowning risks in swimming pools.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Publish a summary of changes to swimming-pool safety guidance, including reminders about lifeguard vigilance, operator safety responsibilities and the report’s highlighted issues.

    Stated by Royal Life Saving Society UKStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 February 2018.
  2. 2

    Create and launch a supervisory qualification for Duty Managers covering supervisors’ responsibilities for preventing accidents, including issues highlighted in the report.

    Stated by Royal Life Saving Society UKStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 February 2018.
  3. 3

    Present revised swimming-pool safety guidance and raise the report’s concerns about lifeguard numbers, rotation and drowning-detection systems at the CIMSPA conference.

    Stated by Royal Life Saving Society UKStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 February 2018.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Ongoing legal proceedings prevent proposing further training-DVD action because it could prejudice criminal charges or civil claims.

    Stated by Royal Life Saving Society UKUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a summary of changes to swimming-pool safety guidance, including reminders about lifeguard vigilance, operator safety responsibilities and the report’s highlighted issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Royal Life Saving Society UK, CIMSPA and ukactive are also committed to providing a summary of the changes between the current and new versions of Managing Health and Safety in Swimming Pools. It is intended, alongside the summary, that we include clear reminders about the importance of lifeguard vigilance and about the roles that operators play in terms of safety within swimming pools. Within this publication, it is intended that we raise the issues highlighted in the FDR.”

Source location

2017-0410-Response-by-RLSS-UK
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and launch a supervisory qualification for Duty Managers covering supervisors’ responsibilities for preventing accidents, including issues highlighted in the report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prior to the FDR, the Royal Life Saving Society have been committed to creating a supervisory qualification that is aimed at Duty Managers. An aim of the qualification is to remind those that are supervising lifeguards of their responsibilities to prevent accidents. This will include information that you have highlighted in the FDR. It is intended that this qualification is launched in the first quarter of 2018.”

Source location

2017-0410-Response-by-RLSS-UK
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present revised swimming-pool safety guidance and raise the report’s concerns about lifeguard numbers, rotation and drowning-detection systems at the CIMSPA conference.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, we discussed that there is an imminent opportunity to raise important swimming pool safety matters that are detailed within the FDR, notably those issues concerning lifeguard numbers, lifeguard rotation and drowning detection systems. On the 21st February 2018, CIMSPA are hosting their annual conference and this event will host the launch of the Health and Safety Executive revised guidance, Managing Health and Safety in Swimming Pools (HSG 179).”

Source location

2017-0410-Response-by-RLSS-UK
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ongoing legal proceedings prevent proposing further training-DVD action because it could prejudice criminal charges or civil claims.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am conscious that any proposed action the Royal Life Saving Society take could prejudice any outcome of any criminal charges or indeed civil claims and I would be grateful if an extension could be granted until such time that the legal proceedings have progressed further.”

Source location

2017-0410-Response-by-RLSS-UK
Page 1 · response
Published 26 February 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026