PFD report

Mrs Anne Patricia Harper · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Feb 2021•Oxfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of a major trauma lead consultant
  2. Lack of a trauma co-ordinator
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Redefine Orthopaedic Trauma Consultant posts as Major Trauma Consultant roles.

    Stated by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  2. Action

    Relocate trauma services to adjacent clinical areas to support overall care under a Major Trauma Consultant.

    Stated by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Existing arrangements ensure all major trauma patients have a lead consultant with expertise to manage their injuries.

    Stated by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a major trauma lead consultant

Wider context from the report

“1. I heard evidence that a Major Trauma Centre is expected to have a major trauma lead consultant, and a trauma co-ordinator (in accordance with NICE guidelines). I understand that the Trust does not have these posts and that this has been the position since at least 2018. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a trauma co-ordinator

Wider context from the report

“1. I heard evidence that a Major Trauma Centre is expected to have a major trauma lead consultant, and a trauma co-ordinator (in accordance with NICE guidelines). I understand that the Trust does not have these posts and that this has been the position since at least 2018. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redefine Orthopaedic Trauma Consultant posts as Major Trauma Consultant roles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The requirement for all major trauma patients to be initially managed by a single group of consultants has been difficult to implement because of the established successful model of care as described above. This work has been ongoing since the last ‘in person’ peer review in 2018. We will redefine the current Orthopaedic Trauma consultants to that of the 'MTC Consultant'.”

Source location

2021-0174-Response-from-Oxford-University-Hospitals-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Relocate trauma services to adjacent clinical areas to support overall care under a Major Trauma Consultant.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As the Trust moves to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic, we will relocate trauma services to clinical areas that are physically adjacent. With this in place, patients would be admitted under the overall care of a ‘Major Trauma Consultant’ who will be an Orthopaedics consultant. If their trauma is exclusively related to a different surgical speciality, referral would be made to that speciality for ongoing lead care. If the patient has orthopaedic/multiple (poly) trauma the patient would remain under the care of the MTC Consultant. Isolated traumatic brain injuries will continue to be admitted under the care of neurosurgery. We would expect to retain some flexibility if a patient-specific factor required variation to this plan in order to ensure best care for the patient.”

Source location

2021-0174-Response-from-Oxford-University-Hospitals-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing arrangements ensure all major trauma patients have a lead consultant with expertise to manage their injuries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“the hospital trauma service and leads the multidisciplinary team care. At the OUH there is a Trauma Orthopaedic Consultant available 24 hours a day. That consultant can lead on the involvement of any other staff required.”

Source location

2021-0174-Response-from-Oxford-University-Hospitals-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The reported concerns could not have changed the outcome of Mrs Harper’s case.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you described in your report, I do not feel that either of the reported concerns could have changed the sad outcome of Mrs Harper’s case however we are committed to delivering change for future patients.”

Source location

2021-0174-Response-from-Oxford-University-Hospitals-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Approve two additional whole-time-equivalent Rehabilitation Coordinator posts.

    Stated by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  2. 2

    Increase coordinator staffing to four whole-time-equivalent posts to provide comprehensive five-day service.

    Stated by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 May 2021.
  3. 3

    Establish revised pain-management protocols for chest injuries.

    Stated by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 May 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Approve two additional whole-time-equivalent Rehabilitation Coordinator posts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since your letter, OUH has approved 2 additional WTE RC posts. This will increase the number of WTE coordinators to 4 to provide comprehensive 5 days service. This staff group may be able to provide limited weekend cover but it is our expectation that 2 further posts will be added to deliver resilient 7 day working.”

Source location

2021-0174-Response-from-Oxford-University-Hospitals-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase coordinator staffing to four whole-time-equivalent posts to provide comprehensive five-day service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since your letter, OUH has approved 2 additional WTE RC posts. This will increase the number of WTE coordinators to 4 to provide comprehensive 5 days service. This staff group may be able to provide limited weekend cover but it is our expectation that 2 further posts will be added to deliver resilient 7 day working.”

Source location

2021-0174-Response-from-Oxford-University-Hospitals-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish revised pain-management protocols for chest injuries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, I would like to reiterate that changes in the protocols for management of pain in chest injuries have been established since your letter was received.”

Source location

2021-0174-Response-from-Oxford-University-Hospitals-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 May 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026