PFD report

Thomas Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Jun 2014•Suffolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Police/local authority protocol not in force in Suffolk
  2. Lack of criminalisation of fly grazing in England
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing laws and powers are considered sufficient to address horses straying onto highways and fly-grazing, so a specific offence is not proposed.

    Stated by Department for Environment, Food & Rural AffairsExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Police/local authority protocol not in force in Suffolk

Wider context from the report

“Fly grazing is a national problem which is currently more difficult to curtail because (1) It is not currently a criminal offence in England (although I understand that steps are being taken to remedy this in Wales) (2) A police/local authority protocol is being worked on but not currently in force in Suffolk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of criminalisation of fly grazing in England

Wider context from the report

“Fly grazing is a national problem which is currently more difficult to curtail because (1) It is not currently a criminal offence in England (although I understand that steps are being taken to remedy this in Wales) (2) A police/local authority protocol is being worked on but not currently in force in Suffolk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing laws and powers are considered sufficient to address horses straying onto highways and fly-grazing, so a specific offence is not proposed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am grateful to you for drawing attention to this very sad case and I offer my condolences to Ms Chenery. You suggest that the provision of a specific offence of fly-grazing would help prevent such incidents in the future. However, we already have laws in place to tackle the straying of animals onto a highway. In particular, the Highways Act 1980; section 155 of which provides offences relating to straying livestock on a highway and which may be relevant in this case. Under the 1980 Act, the horses can be removed if they are straying onto, or are by the side of, the highway and the associated costs recovered from the owner of the horses.”

Source location

Response from DEFRA
Page 1 · response
Published 9 April 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss the fly-grazing problem with animal welfare, local authority and horse industry stakeholders.

    Stated by Department for Environment, Food & Rural AffairsStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 April 2014.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Making it easier for local authorities to remove and euthanase non-suffering fly-grazing horses is not necessarily considered an effective solution.

    Stated by Department for Environment, Food & Rural AffairsDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the fly-grazing problem with animal welfare, local authority and horse industry stakeholders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In summary, I have discussed the problem with a number of key stakeholders including animal welfare charities, local authority representatives and other horse industry organisations. At our request, stakeholders are looking at trying to encourage more joined up working, using the advice and guidance referred to above, in areas where this is a serious problem. We will then wish to see whether this has an effect.”

Source location

Response from DEFRA
Page 2 · response
Published 9 April 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Making it easier for local authorities to remove and euthanase non-suffering fly-grazing horses is not necessarily considered an effective solution.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am keeping a close eye on the situation in Wales, now that the Welsh Government has introduced a law allowing local authorities to seize illegally grazed horses from private land. Having spoken to both Welsh and English local authorities, early indications suggest that the new law has not made much difference but it may be too soon to judge. I believe that the real long term solution to this issue is to target the perpetrators directly. I don’t believe the solution is necessarily to make it easier for local authorities to remove fly-grazing horses which are not suffering and have them euthanased. My concern is that the costs of such actions are borne by the local authority and it provides little incentive for the perpetrators to change their behaviour. The cycle of abandonment of horses is likely to continue, with local authorities having to bear the costs.”

Source location

Response from DEFRA
Page 2 · response
Published 9 April 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026