PFD report

Sheila Margaret Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Apr 2025•Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of drivers with dementia to self-report medical conditions to the DVLA
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate driver licensing controls for road safetyPart of recurring concern: Unreliable DVLA medical fitness notification arrangements
  2. Failure to report multiple medical conditions requiring DVLA monitoring
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate driver licensing controls for road safetyPart of recurring concern: Unreliable DVLA medical fitness notification arrangements
  3. Under-recording of dementia in collision statistics
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate road-traffic-collision reporting for highway safety managementPart of recurring concern: Incomplete recording of contributory factors in road-collision statistics
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Consider research and evidence, including any additional research needed, to inform potential future changes to the driver licensing system.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 April 2025.
  2. Action

    Continue working with healthcare professionals, driving organisations and regulatory bodies to identify and assess people who pose road-safety risks because of unrecognised medical conditions.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 April 2025.
  3. Action

    Continue engaging healthcare professionals and regulatory bodies to identify and address obstacles to reporting conditions when patients lack insight or capacity.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 April 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    STATS19 cannot capture all medical contributory factors because detailed identification would impose practical burdens on police officers.

    Stated by Department for TransportUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of drivers with dementia to self-report medical conditions to the DVLA

Wider context from the report

“1. Dementia affects approximately half a million sufferers in the United Kingdom of which the DVLA has only been notified of approximately 30,000 drivers. It would appear that there is significant underreporting of drivers who may suffer from dementia 2. The current system for vehicle licensing relies upon the self-awareness of a driver and their ability to self-report medical conditions to the DVLA. A system that relies upon the self-awareness of a person applying for a driving licence to self-report a medical condition of dementia where the condition itself is characterised by a lack of self-awareness is inherently unsafe and exposes other road users to the risk of death or serious injury ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate driver licensing controls for road safety; Unreliable DVLA medical fitness notification arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to report multiple medical conditions requiring DVLA monitoring

Wider context from the report

“5. In this case, the driver suffered from focal epilepsy, which was the primary cause of the collision resulting Sheila Edwards' death. However, the memory deficit caused by dementia resulted in a lack of awareness of an underlying neurological condition. In such cases there is a substantial risk that neither of the conditions will be reported to the DVLA for monitoring. The result is that a driver with two conditions that should be monitored by the DVLA who is both unaware of their illnesses and the need to report themselves to the DVLA. This creates a substantial risk to other road users. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate driver licensing controls for road safety; Unreliable DVLA medical fitness notification arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Under-recording of dementia in collision statistics

Wider context from the report

“4. As a result of the way in which collision data is collected using Stats 19, there is a significant likelihood that dementia is under recorded in collision statistics. The nation this point regarding collision data regarding the visual aspect of collisions, the PFD report into the deaths of Mary Cunningham, Grace Foulds, Anne Ferguson and Peter Westwell should be consulted. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate road-traffic-collision reporting for highway safety management; Incomplete recording of contributory factors in road-collision statistics.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider research and evidence, including any additional research needed, to inform potential future changes to the driver licensing system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Officials are considering the research and evidence provided and what additional research may be needed to inform potential future changes. These considerations include the system of self-declaration and the potential for the introduction of age-based testing. Consideration is also being given to policy options as part of the Government’s Road Safety Strategy, which is being developed and the details of which will be provided in due course.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 24 April 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with healthcare professionals, driving organisations and regulatory bodies to identify and assess people who pose road-safety risks because of unrecognised medical conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My Department will continue to work with healthcare professionals, driving organisations and regulatory bodies to enhance the safety of our roads and ensure that those who pose a risk to road safety due to lack of awareness of their medical condition are appropriately identified and assessed.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 4 · response
Published 24 April 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue engaging healthcare professionals and regulatory bodies to identify and address obstacles to reporting conditions when patients lack insight or capacity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although the process for establishing that a driver meets the medical standards for driving is based on self-declaration, I recognise that this may be difficult for those drivers with conditions that may impair their insight into their health status. My department will continue to engage with healthcare professionals and their regulatory bodies to identify and address any obstacles that may hinder the reporting process, particularly where their patient lacks the insight or capacity to inform the DVLA of their condition themselves.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 24 April 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

STATS19 cannot capture all medical contributory factors because detailed identification would impose practical burdens on police officers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that you have raised concerns about the STATS19 system used in GB for collecting and reporting road traffic collision data. The Department acknowledges that STATS19 has limitations in identifying the causes of collisions in detail, particularly regarding the recording of medical conditions such as dementia or cognitive impairment as a contributory factor. These limitations are set out in the guidance provided (for example, the guidance on contributory factors). Contributory factors are based on the judgement of police officers at the scene of an accident or shortly afterwards. As a result, conditions such as those affecting cognitive function may go unrecorded, especially if the impairment is not immediately apparent or if the officer is unaware of the driver’s medical history.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 24 April 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Consider policy options addressing driver licensing within the Government’s developing Road Safety Strategy.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 April 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider policy options addressing driver licensing within the Government’s developing Road Safety Strategy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Officials are considering the research and evidence provided and what additional research may be needed to inform potential future changes. These considerations include the system of self-declaration and the potential for the introduction of age-based testing. Consideration is also being given to policy options as part of the Government’s Road Safety Strategy, which is being developed and the details of which will be provided in due course.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 24 April 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026