PFD report

Allan Michael WADDUP · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Aug 2022•North Northumberland

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
11

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to triage mental health self-referrals within 24 hours
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
  2. Failure to make in-person contact before discharging mental health patients who do not attend appointments
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to actively engage mental health service users before discharge
  3. Lack of weekend triage for mental health referrals
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Request that the revised discharge process be incorporated into the Trust-wide discharge policy.

    Stated by Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 November 2022.
  2. Action

    Update the service Operational Policy to reflect the revised face-to-face discharge process.

    Stated by Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 November 2022.
  3. Action

    Request electronic kiosk referrals with referral-processing timeframes and urgent-contact information from the prison provider.

    Stated by Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 November 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to triage mental health self-referrals within 24 hours

Wider context from the report

“(2) Mr Waddup was referred to mental health on 30 October 2019. Attempts were made to assess him in his cell over the telephone on 14, 19 and 21 November 2019. He was discharged from mental health on 2 December 2019 without an assessment being undertaken. There was no in person contact to explore the reasons he did not attend those appointments prior to discharge. It could not be confirmed he was personally aware of those appointments. He self-referred on 5 December 2019 and was not triaged within 24 hours or assessed prior to his death. An immediate review of the Did Not Attend (DNA) policy for the mental health services to include an in person contact is being undertaken prior to discharge but has not been completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make in-person contact before discharging mental health patients who do not attend appointments

Wider context from the report

“(2) Mr Waddup was referred to mental health on 30 October 2019. Attempts were made to assess him in his cell over the telephone on 14, 19 and 21 November 2019. He was discharged from mental health on 2 December 2019 without an assessment being undertaken. There was no in person contact to explore the reasons he did not attend those appointments prior to discharge. It could not be confirmed he was personally aware of those appointments. He self-referred on 5 December 2019 and was not triaged within 24 hours or assessed prior to his death. An immediate review of the Did Not Attend (DNA) policy for the mental health services to include an in person contact is being undertaken prior to discharge but has not been completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to actively engage mental health service users before discharge.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of weekend triage for mental health referrals

Wider context from the report

“(3) Mr Waddup self-referred via the kiosk system. There is no triaging of referrals on a weekend. A disclaimer or warning directing inmates to how to seek urgent assistance is not currently displayed on the kiosk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide inmates with appointment letters notifying them of planned mental health appointments

Wider context from the report

“(1) Mr Waddup was referred to mental health on 29th October 2019 on triaged within 24 hours on 30th October 2019. Attempts were made to assess him by telephone on 14, 19 and 21 November 2019. It is not clear if Mr Waddup personally knew of the appointments. Appointment letters are currently not sent to inmates at HMP Northumberland to notify them of planned appointments. Prisoners could be notified on the day via the appointment scheduling process within the prison whereby the wing is notified of who has appointments with various departments. I heard that TEWV provide mental health services across the North East cluster of prisons including four prisons in the North West. In some custodial facilities an appointment letter is sent. This system is not replicated in HMP Northumberland ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably send required mental health service communications to service users.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to display kiosk warnings directing inmates to urgent assistance

Wider context from the report

“(3) Mr Waddup self-referred via the kiosk system. There is no triaging of referrals on a weekend. A disclaimer or warning directing inmates to how to seek urgent assistance is not currently displayed on the kiosk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request that the revised discharge process be incorporated into the Trust-wide discharge policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest, an immediate lessons learned bulletin was shared with all staff working across the service within the Trust, advising at the point of discharge, appointments must take place face to face. A service level meeting was also convened to share the information and requirements with Team Managers, so ensure information was filtered down to all staff. The Operational Policy for the service has been updated to reflect the updated discharge process and a request has been made to ensure upon review (in January 2023) this is also reflected in the trust wide discharge policy.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 2 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the service Operational Policy to reflect the revised face-to-face discharge process.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest, an immediate lessons learned bulletin was shared with all staff working across the service within the Trust, advising at the point of discharge, appointments must take place face to face. A service level meeting was also convened to share the information and requirements with Team Managers, so ensure information was filtered down to all staff. The Operational Policy for the service has been updated to reflect the updated discharge process and a request has been made to ensure upon review (in January 2023) this is also reflected in the trust wide discharge policy.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 2 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request electronic kiosk referrals with referral-processing timeframes and urgent-contact information from the prison provider.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The prison service provider at HMP Northumberland has granted the request to remove the ability to refer to mental health services via kiosk. Due to the restrictions on the prison kiosk system, men are unable to give any detailed rationale for the appointment request making triage processes difficult for the team upon receipt of the request. A request has been made to the prison provider at HMP Northumberland as to whether an electronic referral can be uploaded to the kiosk system, as well as a notification advising patients of timeframes for referrals to be processed and who to contact, and how, in an urgent situation.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 2 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce reviewed and updated appointment letter templates across prison establishments, including HMP Northumberland.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Appointment letter templates have been reviewed and updated and have now been introduced across all prison establishments, including HMP Northumberland where TEWV provide Mental Health care delivery. As part of this process of review, the letter content has been reviewed to ensure its content is succinct and clear, dated and provides the relevant information.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 1 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Did Not Attend policy to require in-person contact before mental-health discharge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(2) Mr Waddup was referred to mental health on 30 October 2019. Attempts were made to assess him in his cell over the telephone on 14, 19 and 21 November 2019. He was discharged from mental health on 2 December without an assessment being undertaken. There was no in person contact to explore the reasons he did not attend those appointments prior to discharge. It could not be confirmed he was personally aware of those appointments. He self-referred on 5 December 2019 and was not triaged within 24 hours or assessed prior to his death. An immediate review of the Did Not Attend (DNA) policy for the mental health services to include an in person contact is being undertaken prior to discharge but has not been completed.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 2 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide self-referral forms, including easy-read versions, with questions enabling triage by service need and urgency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Self-referrals, including easy read versions, are available to all men on wing locations. The referral asks specific questions which allow the team to triage the referral appropriately in relation to service required, as well as urgency.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 3 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share discharge lessons and face-to-face appointment requirements with service staff and Team Managers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the inquest, an immediate lessons learned bulletin was shared with all staff working across the service within the Trust, advising at the point of discharge, appointments must take place face to face. A service level meeting was also convened to share the information and requirements with Team Managers, so ensure information was filtered down to all staff. The Operational Policy for the service has been updated to reflect the updated discharge process and a request has been made to ensure upon review (in January 2023) this is also reflected in the trust wide discharge policy.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 2 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Audit transfer-of-care handovers between HMP Durham and HMP Northumberland to verify timely information transfer.

    Stated by Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 November 2022.
  2. 2

    Audit HMP Northumberland assessment timeliness against the required four-working-day timeframe.

    Stated by Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 November 2022.
  3. 3

    Update transfer-of-care procedures and clinician handover templates, and support staff to complete them consistently.

    Stated by Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 November 2022.
  4. 4

    Produce and display wing posters explaining mental-health self-referral routes and urgent or crisis assistance.

    Stated by Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 November 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit transfer-of-care handovers between HMP Durham and HMP Northumberland to verify timely information transfer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Transfer of care telephone handover call has been audited between HMP Durham and HMP Northumberland to ensure patients are handed over in a timely manner. Audit results show this process is effective and patients are handed over within the required contractual timeframe of 24 hours or, the next working day if the transfer takes place at the weekend. Any urgent transfer information is handed over on the day of the expected transfer.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 1 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit HMP Northumberland assessment timeliness against the required four-working-day timeframe.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to ensure compliance with the required contractual timeframe for carrying out assessments (4 working days if a non-urgent appointment), we have carried out an audit of this process in HMP Northumberland and can confirm that the audit result demonstrated 100% of offered assessments are undertaken within the 4 working days.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 2 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update transfer-of-care procedures and clinician handover templates, and support staff to complete them consistently.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The standard process has been reviewed and updated to ensure all staff are clear regarding responsibilities of transferring patient care. The templates the sending and receiving clinicians fill out, to complete the handover, have been updated to improve”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 1 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce and display wing posters explaining mental-health self-referral routes and urgent or crisis assistance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the interim, posters have been produced and displayed on the wings providing clear information to all prisoners about how to refer to the mental health team using a self-referral, or by speaking to any member of staff. Posters include what to do in urgent or crisis situations, specifically in relation to risk to self.”

Source location

Response from NHS Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys
Page 2 · response
Published 3 November 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026