PFD report

Mr Bradley Fraser Brown · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Nov 2018•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of national guidance on late prison transfers and cut-off points
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure safe prisoner transfers
  2. Failure to provide clinicians with access to transferring prisoners’ full healthcare records
    Part of recurring concern: Electronic patient records failing to make relevant clinical information available and actionablePart of recurring concern: Failure to provide clinicians with complete prisoner information for safe assessment
  3. Inadequate weekend mental health staffing and risk assessment for late prison transfers
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure safe prisoner transfersPart of recurring concern: Inadequate mental health risk assessment
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Require healthcare staff to notify the Orderly Officer when new arrivals miss appointments and record follow-up actions when prisoners refuse attendance.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 May 2019.
  2. Action

    Strengthen first-night procedures by monitoring every new arrival for 72 hours, including random welfare checks during lock-up periods.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 May 2019.
  3. Action

    Instruct Governors not to enter local agreements accepting transferred prisoners on Fridays.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 May 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Existing weekday transfer schedules, advance warnings and exceptional weekend transfers are considered sufficient; removing Friday transfers would increase pressure and late arrivals.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance on late prison transfers and cut-off points

Wider context from the report

“1. Late transfer of Prisoners between Prisons - on Fridays/at a weekend puts Prisoners at increased risk of death as adequate mental health/risk assessments cannot be conducted. There are no mental health nurses available to assess/monitor prisoners over the weekend, thus making late transfers unsafe. The same concern applies, in principle, to public/bank holidays. There are different levels of healthcare at the weekends as compared to weekdays. This gives cause for concern given the inherent susceptibilities with which prisoners frequently present. Transfer itself creates vulnerability that requires additional support, intervention and care and is of particular concern where the transferring prisoner is being held in isolation within the Care and Separation Unit (CSU or ‘Seg’ as it is colloquially known). By virtue of the very different prison regime at the weekends (increased lock up periods/isolation in cells, fewer staff on duty, reduced activities) timely risk assessment is critical in the prevention of self-harm leading to death. Late transfer also risks inadequate assessment where the clinician concerned cannot access the prisoner’s full healthcare record, thus substantially reducing the amount of key information available to them. Where the transferring prisoner has not been seen by Healthcare, other clinicians such as mental health nurses cannot access the healthcare record database. There is no national guidance in relation to late transfers/cut-off points etc. 2. Commissioning of Mental Health/Healthcare Services: As commissioners for healthcare services within prisons, the above concerns are also being brought to the attention of NHS England, for action. These issues are not unique to the Prison involved in Mr Brown’s case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure safe prisoner transfers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide clinicians with access to transferring prisoners’ full healthcare records

Wider context from the report

“1. Late transfer of Prisoners between Prisons - on Fridays/at a weekend puts Prisoners at increased risk of death as adequate mental health/risk assessments cannot be conducted. There are no mental health nurses available to assess/monitor prisoners over the weekend, thus making late transfers unsafe. The same concern applies, in principle, to public/bank holidays. There are different levels of healthcare at the weekends as compared to weekdays. This gives cause for concern given the inherent susceptibilities with which prisoners frequently present. Transfer itself creates vulnerability that requires additional support, intervention and care and is of particular concern where the transferring prisoner is being held in isolation within the Care and Separation Unit (CSU or ‘Seg’ as it is colloquially known). By virtue of the very different prison regime at the weekends (increased lock up periods/isolation in cells, fewer staff on duty, reduced activities) timely risk assessment is critical in the prevention of self-harm leading to death. Late transfer also risks inadequate assessment where the clinician concerned cannot access the prisoner’s full healthcare record, thus substantially reducing the amount of key information available to them. Where the transferring prisoner has not been seen by Healthcare, other clinicians such as mental health nurses cannot access the healthcare record database. There is no national guidance in relation to late transfers/cut-off points etc. 2. Commissioning of Mental Health/Healthcare Services: As commissioners for healthcare services within prisons, the above concerns are also being brought to the attention of NHS England, for action. These issues are not unique to the Prison involved in Mr Brown’s case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Electronic patient records failing to make relevant clinical information available and actionable; Failure to provide clinicians with complete prisoner information for safe assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate weekend mental health staffing and risk assessment for late prison transfers

Wider context from the report

“1. Late transfer of Prisoners between Prisons - on Fridays/at a weekend puts Prisoners at increased risk of death as adequate mental health/risk assessments cannot be conducted. There are no mental health nurses available to assess/monitor prisoners over the weekend, thus making late transfers unsafe. The same concern applies, in principle, to public/bank holidays. There are different levels of healthcare at the weekends as compared to weekdays. This gives cause for concern given the inherent susceptibilities with which prisoners frequently present. Transfer itself creates vulnerability that requires additional support, intervention and care and is of particular concern where the transferring prisoner is being held in isolation within the Care and Separation Unit (CSU or ‘Seg’ as it is colloquially known). By virtue of the very different prison regime at the weekends (increased lock up periods/isolation in cells, fewer staff on duty, reduced activities) timely risk assessment is critical in the prevention of self-harm leading to death. Late transfer also risks inadequate assessment where the clinician concerned cannot access the prisoner’s full healthcare record, thus substantially reducing the amount of key information available to them. Where the transferring prisoner has not been seen by Healthcare, other clinicians such as mental health nurses cannot access the healthcare record database. There is no national guidance in relation to late transfers/cut-off points etc. 2. Commissioning of Mental Health/Healthcare Services: As commissioners for healthcare services within prisons, the above concerns are also being brought to the attention of NHS England, for action. These issues are not unique to the Prison involved in Mr Brown’s case. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure safe prisoner transfers; Inadequate mental health risk assessment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require healthcare staff to notify the Orderly Officer when new arrivals miss appointments and record follow-up actions when prisoners refuse attendance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This provides for a period of monitoring to ensure that vulnerability or violence is managed appropriately. Healthcare staff have also been instructed to notify the Orderly Officer if any prisoner misses an appointment in the early days, so that reasons for non-attendance can be followed up. If a prisoner refuses to attend, Healthcare will be informed and the actions taken recorded by prison staff.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen first-night procedures by monitoring every new arrival for 72 hours, including random welfare checks during lock-up periods.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, as a result of the concerns you have raised, the Governor at HMP Buckley Hall has instructed all Governors at the establishment that they should not enter into local agreements to accept transferred prisoners on a Friday. This will be reviewed once the changes to the provision of healthcare have been embedded. In addition, a range of measures has been implemented to ensure that all new arrivals receive the same level of care regardless of when they transfer takes place. First night procedures have been strengthened to ensure that all prisoners arriving at the prison are subject to a 72 hour period of monitoring, which includes randomly spaced welfare checks during lock up periods. A Challenge Support and Intervention Plan (CSIP) is opened for any new prisoners who have been subject to a period of segregation prior to transfer.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Instruct Governors not to enter local agreements accepting transferred prisoners on Fridays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, as a result of the concerns you have raised, the Governor at HMP Buckley Hall has instructed all Governors at the establishment that they should not enter into local agreements to accept transferred prisoners on a Friday. This will be reviewed once the changes to the provision of healthcare have been embedded. In addition, a range of measures has been implemented to ensure that all new arrivals receive the same level of care regardless of when they transfer takes place. First night procedures have been strengthened to ensure that all prisoners arriving at the prison are subject to a 72 hour period of monitoring, which includes randomly spaced welfare checks during lock up periods. A Challenge Support and Intervention Plan (CSIP) is opened for any new prisoners who have been subject to a period of segregation prior to transfer.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue HMP Haverigg staff a reminder to confirm transfers with Healthcare so medical records are promptly reassigned and available on arrival.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Prior to any transfer there is a requirement for Healthcare staff at the sending establishment to assess each prisoner to ensure that any health concerns are recorded and communicated to the receiving prison and to confirm that the prisoner is medically fit to be moved. A notice has been issued to all staff at HMP Haverigg, which was the transferring prison in Mr Brown’s case, reminding them to confirm to Healthcare staff any transfer, so that medical records are reassigned promptly in order that they are immediately available when the prisoner arrives at the new establishment.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Open a Challenge Support and Intervention Plan for new prisoners segregated before transfer.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, as a result of the concerns you have raised, the Governor at HMP Buckley Hall has instructed all Governors at the establishment that they should not enter into local agreements to accept transferred prisoners on a Friday. This will be reviewed once the changes to the provision of healthcare have been embedded. In addition, a range of measures has been implemented to ensure that all new arrivals receive the same level of care regardless of when they transfer takes place. First night procedures have been strengthened to ensure that all prisoners arriving at the prison are subject to a 72 hour period of monitoring, which includes randomly spaced welfare checks during lock up periods. A Challenge Support and Intervention Plan (CSIP) is opened for any new prisoners who have been subject to a period of segregation prior to transfer.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing weekday transfer schedules, advance warnings and exceptional weekend transfers are considered sufficient; removing Friday transfers would increase pressure and late arrivals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“are located in the appropriate category of prison. Inter prison transfers currently take place from Monday and Friday in accordance with a schedule agreed with the Prison Escort Court Service (PECS). Removing Friday from the schedule would put undue pressure on the remaining four days and increase the risk of late arrivals on those days. Prisons are always given advance warning of these scheduled transfers and PECS notify establishments of their anticipated arrival times, so that arrangements can be made. In terms of weekends, whilst there is provision at a national level for inter prison transfers to be facilitated on a Saturday or Sunday, this will only be done under exceptional circumstances and is extremely rare. Transfers generally only take place over a weekend when an emergency at one prison necessitates a move of prisoners to a different establishment.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

NHS England is responsible for responding directly to concerns about healthcare processes and mental healthcare provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You have expressed concerns about the transfer of prisoners between prisons on a Friday and at weekends and how this may impact on the level of care and support available to them, particularly in respect of Healthcare and Mental Health assessments. I understand that NHS England will also be responding directly to your concerns in terms of their healthcare processes and will explain that the new specification for the provision of healthcare at Buckley Hall will include access to mental healthcare 7 days a week.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 1 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Share learning from the incident widely across the prison estate.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 May 2019.
  2. 2

    Review the Friday transfer restriction after healthcare provision changes are embedded.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 May 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from the incident widely across the prison estate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you again for bringing these matters of concern to my attention. We will ensure that learning from this tragic incident is shared widely across the prison estate.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Friday transfer restriction after healthcare provision changes are embedded.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, as a result of the concerns you have raised, the Governor at HMP Buckley Hall has instructed all Governors at the establishment that they should not enter into local agreements to accept transferred prisoners on a Friday. This will be reviewed once the changes to the provision of healthcare have been embedded. In addition, a range of measures has been implemented to ensure that all new arrivals receive the same level of care regardless of when they transfer takes place. First night procedures have been strengthened to ensure that all prisoners arriving at the prison are subject to a 72 hour period of monitoring, which includes randomly spaced welfare checks during lock up periods. A Challenge Support and Intervention Plan (CSIP) is opened for any new prisoners who have been subject to a period of segregation prior to transfer.”

Source location

2018-0374-Response-by-HM-Prison-and-Probation-Service
Page 2 · response
Published 10 May 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026