PFD report

Sonielia Laura Caya HOLMES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 23 Oct 2014•Bedfordshire and Luton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of the Haematology Department to remain contactable by attending doctors
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable contact arrangements for urgent clinical advicePart of recurring concern: Unreliable haematology clinical review and advice
  2. Failure of Haematologists to respond to requests for advice and review
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable haematology clinical review and advice
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Haematology Department to remain contactable by attending doctors

Wider context from the report

“1. That on numerous occasions it proved impossible for the doctors attending Miss Holmes to contact the Haematology Department at the Hospital. This was despite the staff using all known contact details, including mobile phones and bleep numbers. 2. That the Haematologists working within the Hospital failed to respond to messages left for them to offer advice and to review Miss Holmes. 3. It was apparent from the evidence that Haematology is a vital service within the Hospital and any failure to respond to requests for assistance from other clinicians will put lives at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable contact arrangements for urgent clinical advice; Unreliable haematology clinical review and advice.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of Haematologists to respond to requests for advice and review

Wider context from the report

“1. That on numerous occasions it proved impossible for the doctors attending Miss Holmes to contact the Haematology Department at the Hospital. This was despite the staff using all known contact details, including mobile phones and bleep numbers. 2. That the Haematologists working within the Hospital failed to respond to messages left for them to offer advice and to review Miss Holmes. 3. It was apparent from the evidence that Haematology is a vital service within the Hospital and any failure to respond to requests for assistance from other clinicians will put lives at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable haematology clinical review and advice.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.