PFD report

Mr Sam Spooner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Nov 2019•Cheshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Excessive reliance on family members unable to keep a patient safe
  2. Failure to identify and adequately involve other agencies able to keep a patient safe
  3. Lack of multi-agency information sharing and communication between health care providers
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Provide a two-module suicide-prevention course with case-based strategies and resources for primary-care intervention.

    Stated by Royal College of General PractitionersStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 December 2019.
  2. Action

    Support NHS England and devolved health authorities in developing improved mental-health care, including information sharing, case coordination and family-carer support.

    Stated by Royal College of General PractitionersStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 December 2019.
  3. Action

    Publish guidance for GPs on assessing, managing and referring patients with suicidal ideation, including a toolkit and quick-reference leaflet.

    Stated by Royal College of General PractitionersStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 December 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing RCGP mental-health education, guidance and service-improvement work is considered an adequate response to suicide-prevention concerns.

    Stated by Royal College of General PractitionersExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Excessive reliance on family members unable to keep a patient safe

Wider context from the report

“1) There was a lack of multi-agency information sharing, co-operation, co-ordination and effective communication both within and between health care providers which meant that: a) The private counsellor who provided treatment to Mr Spooner did not have adequate information from other health care providers as to his medical/mental health history, diagnosis and treatment by other healthcare professionals. b) There was a failure to adopt an effective multi-agency approach to the care for Mr Spooner from 20th August 2018 when it was known that he was actively considering ending his life. c) There was a failure to adequately intervene from 30th August 2018 when it was known that: (1) Mr Spooner had recently attempted to take his life; and (2) Mr Spooner had subsequently undertaken additional research and made further preparations to enable him to do so. 2) There was an excessive and unreasonable reliance placed upon Mr Spooner's family by health care providers to keep him safe when those providers knew that Mr Spooner's family were not in a position to do so. Health care providers lacked awareness of and/or failed to adequately involve other agencies who may have been able to keep Mr Spooner safe, for example the police who may have been able to exercise their powers under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to take Mr Spooner to a place of safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify and adequately involve other agencies able to keep a patient safe

Wider context from the report

“1) There was a lack of multi-agency information sharing, co-operation, co-ordination and effective communication both within and between health care providers which meant that: a) The private counsellor who provided treatment to Mr Spooner did not have adequate information from other health care providers as to his medical/mental health history, diagnosis and treatment by other healthcare professionals. b) There was a failure to adopt an effective multi-agency approach to the care for Mr Spooner from 20th August 2018 when it was known that he was actively considering ending his life. c) There was a failure to adequately intervene from 30th August 2018 when it was known that: (1) Mr Spooner had recently attempted to take his life; and (2) Mr Spooner had subsequently undertaken additional research and made further preparations to enable him to do so. 2) There was an excessive and unreasonable reliance placed upon Mr Spooner's family by health care providers to keep him safe when those providers knew that Mr Spooner's family were not in a position to do so. Health care providers lacked awareness of and/or failed to adequately involve other agencies who may have been able to keep Mr Spooner safe, for example the police who may have been able to exercise their powers under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to take Mr Spooner to a place of safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of multi-agency information sharing and communication between health care providers

Wider context from the report

“1) There was a lack of multi-agency information sharing, co-operation, co-ordination and effective communication both within and between health care providers which meant that: a) The private counsellor who provided treatment to Mr Spooner did not have adequate information from other health care providers as to his medical/mental health history, diagnosis and treatment by other healthcare professionals. b) There was a failure to adopt an effective multi-agency approach to the care for Mr Spooner from 20th August 2018 when it was known that he was actively considering ending his life. c) There was a failure to adequately intervene from 30th August 2018 when it was known that: (1) Mr Spooner had recently attempted to take his life; and (2) Mr Spooner had subsequently undertaken additional research and made further preparations to enable him to do so. 2) There was an excessive and unreasonable reliance placed upon Mr Spooner's family by health care providers to keep him safe when those providers knew that Mr Spooner's family were not in a position to do so. Health care providers lacked awareness of and/or failed to adequately involve other agencies who may have been able to keep Mr Spooner safe, for example the police who may have been able to exercise their powers under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to take Mr Spooner to a place of safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care; Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to adequately intervene after a suicide attempt and further suicide preparations

Wider context from the report

“1) There was a lack of multi-agency information sharing, co-operation, co-ordination and effective communication both within and between health care providers which meant that: a) The private counsellor who provided treatment to Mr Spooner did not have adequate information from other health care providers as to his medical/mental health history, diagnosis and treatment by other healthcare professionals. b) There was a failure to adopt an effective multi-agency approach to the care for Mr Spooner from 20th August 2018 when it was known that he was actively considering ending his life. c) There was a failure to adequately intervene from 30th August 2018 when it was known that: (1) Mr Spooner had recently attempted to take his life; and (2) Mr Spooner had subsequently undertaken additional research and made further preparations to enable him to do so. 2) There was an excessive and unreasonable reliance placed upon Mr Spooner's family by health care providers to keep him safe when those providers knew that Mr Spooner's family were not in a position to do so. Health care providers lacked awareness of and/or failed to adequately involve other agencies who may have been able to keep Mr Spooner safe, for example the police who may have been able to exercise their powers under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to take Mr Spooner to a place of safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably follow up identified mental-health safety concerns.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to adopt an effective multi-agency approach to care during known suicide risk

Wider context from the report

“1) There was a lack of multi-agency information sharing, co-operation, co-ordination and effective communication both within and between health care providers which meant that: a) The private counsellor who provided treatment to Mr Spooner did not have adequate information from other health care providers as to his medical/mental health history, diagnosis and treatment by other healthcare professionals. b) There was a failure to adopt an effective multi-agency approach to the care for Mr Spooner from 20th August 2018 when it was known that he was actively considering ending his life. c) There was a failure to adequately intervene from 30th August 2018 when it was known that: (1) Mr Spooner had recently attempted to take his life; and (2) Mr Spooner had subsequently undertaken additional research and made further preparations to enable him to do so. 2) There was an excessive and unreasonable reliance placed upon Mr Spooner's family by health care providers to keep him safe when those providers knew that Mr Spooner's family were not in a position to do so. Health care providers lacked awareness of and/or failed to adequately involve other agencies who may have been able to keep Mr Spooner safe, for example the police who may have been able to exercise their powers under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to take Mr Spooner to a place of safety. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate multi-agency safeguarding coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide a two-module suicide-prevention course with case-based strategies and resources for primary-care intervention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“These elements of competence are assessed via the licensing examination, Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners. In addition to the above, RCGP produces educational material such as a specific learning module on suicide prevention, which is available via our website. This two-module course:”

Source location

2019-0378-Royal-College-of-General-Practitioners
Page 2 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support NHS England and devolved health authorities in developing improved mental-health care, including information sharing, case coordination and family-carer support.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, RCGP regularly inputs into national organisations looking to improve the responsiveness and understanding of mental health services. For example, I have personally attended and input into the All Party Parliamentary Group on Suicide and Self Harm. We also regularly support NHS England and devolved nations health authorities in the development of improved care, frequently alongside our sister Royal College, the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Work has included strategies to improve information sharing and case co-ordination as well as support for family members/carers.”

Source location

2019-0378-Royal-College-of-General-Practitioners
Page 2 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish guidance for GPs on assessing, managing and referring patients with suicidal ideation, including a toolkit and quick-reference leaflet.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To compliment the above course, we have published guidance to general practitioners on the assessment, immediate management and onward referral for patients with suicidal ideation. This is via a detailed “toolkit” and for ease of reference I have enclosed “Suicide Prevention Top Ten Tips” leaflet which gives general guidance in this area.”

Source location

2019-0378-Royal-College-of-General-Practitioners
Page 2 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain and publish a national GP curriculum covering assessment and management of mental health problems, including suicide risk and safety planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The assessment and treatment of patients with mental health difficulties is a core component of being a GP. RCGP has published a detailed curriculum for general practitioners nationally and it is used both to assess doctors aspiring to work as a general practitioner as well as the standards against which we are viewed as qualified GPs. Within this, there is a detailed section on the Care of People with Mental Health Problems. https://www.rcgp.org.uk/training-exams/training/gp-curriculum-overview/online-curriculum-2018/managing-complex-care/3-10-mental-health-problems/3-10-knowledge-and-skills.aspx Key components in this regard are the requirements to:”

Source location

2019-0378-Royal-College-of-General-Practitioners
Page 2 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refer the coroner’s report to the Professional Standards Department to consider whether member guidance on suicidal clients and suicide-risk management should be strengthened.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy has published a range of guidance for its members in working with suicidal clients and managing the risk of suicide. These are available for our members to download from our website. I will pass your report onto our Professional Standards Department for consideration and review as to whether it might be possible to strengthen any current guidance in light of these distressing events.”

Source location

2019-0378-Response-from-British-Association-for-Counselling-and-Psychotherapy_Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend assessment and consent forms to ask about psychiatric history and obtain consent to contact relevant mental health practitioners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“She has spoken to other private psychotherapists and her Clinical Supervisor about their respective practices. Mrs ████████ always asks clients whether they have ever been under Mental Health Services, but she has now amended her assessment and consent forms (which are attached) so that she asks more particular questions about previous psychiatric history. It is also the case that NICE issued guidelines on 10 September 2019 (i.e. after Mr Spooner's death) in relation to multi-agency suicide prevention partnerships and Mrs ████████ has both considered those guidelines and thought about how she might implement some changes in her practice, both as a result of those guidelines and as a result of this case.”

Source location

2019-0378-Response-from-Counsellor_Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing RCGP mental-health education, guidance and service-improvement work is considered an adequate response to suicide-prevention concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“From the above, RCGP already undertakes considerable work in this important area as we see it as a key priority. I will ensure that the sad case of Mr Spooner is brought to the attention of our mental health leads and our educational convenors so that we can continue to do what we can to improve services for patients such as Mr Spooner.”

Source location

2019-0378-Royal-College-of-General-Practitioners
Page 3 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Assess these mental-health and suicide-prevention competencies through the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners licensing examination.

    Stated by Royal College of General PractitionersStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 December 2019.
  2. 2

    Input regularly into national organisations’ work to improve the responsiveness and understanding of mental-health services.

    Stated by Royal College of General PractitionersStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 December 2019.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Assess these mental-health and suicide-prevention competencies through the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners licensing examination.

Verbatim wording from the response

“These elements of competence are assessed via the licensing examination, Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners. In addition to the above, RCGP produces educational material such as a specific learning module on suicide prevention, which is available via our website. This two-module course:”

Source location

2019-0378-Royal-College-of-General-Practitioners
Page 2 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Input regularly into national organisations’ work to improve the responsiveness and understanding of mental-health services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally, RCGP regularly inputs into national organisations looking to improve the responsiveness and understanding of mental health services. For example, I have personally attended and input into the All Party Parliamentary Group on Suicide and Self Harm. We also regularly support NHS England and devolved nations health authorities in the development of improved care, frequently alongside our sister Royal College, the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Work has included strategies to improve information sharing and case co-ordination as well as support for family members/carers.”

Source location

2019-0378-Royal-College-of-General-Practitioners
Page 2 · response
Published 27 December 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026