PFD report

Padiben Dullahb · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Dec 2018•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of out-of-hours radiologist reporting arrangements for x-rays
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable radiology processes for communicating findings and initiating required follow-upPart of recurring concern: Unreliable timeliness of radiology imaging and reporting
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Provide the surgical department with a designated laptop for the on-call Consultant to securely review imaging remotely and provide advice or attend when necessary.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 December 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Existing clinician training and access to on-call consultant radiologists were considered sufficient to identify and manage abnormal out-of-hours x-rays.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of out-of-hours radiologist reporting arrangements for x-rays

Wider context from the report

“(1) Whilst the Hospital has arrangements in place to obtain out of hours reports from radiologists in relation to CT and MRI scans, there is no similar arrangement for x-rays. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable radiology processes for communicating findings and initiating required follow-up; Unreliable timeliness of radiology imaging and reporting.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide the surgical department with a designated laptop for the on-call Consultant to securely review imaging remotely and provide advice or attend when necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Should the doctors still require assistance out of hours with x-ray imaging, the surgical department will now have a designated lap top within the department that will be taken home by the on-call Consultant. They will have access to all Trust systems including imaging and therefore, if a second opinion is required, the Consultant can review this securely at home and provide advice, or attend if necessary.”

Source location

paliben-dullabh-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing clinician training and access to on-call consultant radiologists were considered sufficient to identify and manage abnormal out-of-hours x-rays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is correct that the out-of-hours provider is not contracted to review x-rays. However, this was a deliberate decision taken by the Trust because it was felt that measures were already in place to ensure that any abnormal x-rays could be identified. These measures are as follows:”

Source location

paliben-dullabh-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 11 December 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Implement a safer night-cover model with substantially appointed registrars rotating through night duty.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 11 December 2018.
  2. 2

    Introduce an SHO on duty at night to provide additional support and enable more timely patient reviews and test-result follow-up.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 11 December 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a safer night-cover model with substantially appointed registrars rotating through night duty.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This case highlighted that there was an issue with surgical doctor cover at night and more resources were required to ensure safer staffing levels. The Trust had already committed to addressing this and is in the process of implementing a solution.”

Source location

paliben-dullabh-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 December 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce an SHO on duty at night to provide additional support and enable more timely patient reviews and test-result follow-up.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to comply with BMA guidance in changing workplace practices, this proposal is currently in consultation with the junior doctors and an implementation is expected within the next 3 months. The new model will have substantially appointed registrars rotating through night duty which will enhance governance, consistency of practice and resilience of the cover. In addition, there will be an ‘Senior House Officer (SHO) on duty to which will give another level of support and ensure that delays in reviewing patients should no longer be an issue and test results can be chased up in a more timely manner.”

Source location

paliben-dullabh-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 11 December 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026