PFD report

Lewis James Doyle · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Jun 2019•Liverpool and the Wirral

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to send discharge letters to all current medical attendants
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care servicesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
  2. Failure to provide original prescribers with information about suspended or stopped medication
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of discharge medication information to care staff
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Fund EPMA implementation in an additional 25 NHS trusts.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Individual trusts remain responsible for discharge summaries and transferring medication information after discharge.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to send discharge letters to all current medical attendants

Wider context from the report

“When Mr Doyle was discharged from the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital the GP discharge letter was sent to his GP. Mr GP Doyle was receiving treatment for Acute Coronary Syndrome but also mental health care for a Recurrent Depressive Illness (without Psychosis). Lithium had to be stopped not only because it was at a toxic level but also because of the effect of this and alternate medications on cardiac health. It occurred during the inquest that in similar scenarios better patient care could be delivered, if discharge letters were sent to all current medical attendants, whether in primary, secondary or tertiary care. Information with regarded to suspended or stopped medication was needed by the original prescribers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide original prescribers with information about suspended or stopped medication

Wider context from the report

“When Mr Doyle was discharged from the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital the GP discharge letter was sent to his GP. Mr GP Doyle was receiving treatment for Acute Coronary Syndrome but also mental health care for a Recurrent Depressive Illness (without Psychosis). Lithium had to be stopped not only because it was at a toxic level but also because of the effect of this and alternate medications on cardiac health. It occurred during the inquest that in similar scenarios better patient care could be delivered, if discharge letters were sent to all current medical attendants, whether in primary, secondary or tertiary care. Information with regarded to suspended or stopped medication was needed by the original prescribers. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication of discharge medication information to care staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fund EPMA implementation in an additional 25 NHS trusts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The use of Dictionary of medicines and Devices (dm+d), (a dictionary of descriptions and codes for medicines and devices in use across the NHS), compliant Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) systems makes the process of sending and receiving medicines related information between organisations and health professionals easier and more accurate. It is recognised that this would improve patient safety and hence there is now no national funding to support its roll out. I can confirm that NHS E/I provided funding for an additional 25 Trusts to have EPMA in this last week. The information standards for digital transfer of care do include changes to medicines albeit optional at present. These will be used for the basis for transfer of care in the future (PRSB standards https://theprsb.org/standards/edischarge summary/)”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual trusts remain responsible for discharge summaries and transferring medication information after discharge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst discharge summaries remain the responsibility of individual trusts, the NHS standard contract expects the transfer of information within 24 hours of discharge usually from provider to GP. The discharge information should contain a full and accurate summary record of medications (both prescribed and non-prescribed) including any that were discontinued and any reasons for this – in line with recommendations from the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) and the Professional Record Standards Body (PRSB).¹”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing legal and professional duties provide a sufficient framework for information sharing, so further data-sharing requirements are unnecessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am advised that these legal and professional duties provide a clear framework for the effective sharing of information to support the care and treatment of patients, enabling medical professionals to make decisions on a case by case basis about the information that should be shared.”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-care
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Develop systems linking primary-care prescribing data with hospital admission information.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
  2. 2

    Accelerate the national rollout of hospital electronic prescribing and medicines administration systems.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
  3. 3

    Develop a prioritised and comprehensive suite of medication-safety metrics.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
  4. 4

    Support the Medicine Safety Improvement Programme to improve medication safety across the pathway, including medication reviews and safe patient discharge.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    There is no national funding to support the rollout of electronic prescribing and medicines administration systems.

    Stated by NHS EnglandUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  2. 2

    The local NHS is responsible for reviewing the care provided and implementing any necessary learning.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop systems linking primary-care prescribing data with hospital admission information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“programme includes objectives on systems and practices that, amongst other things, covers the following points relevant to this case:”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Accelerate the national rollout of hospital electronic prescribing and medicines administration systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“programme includes objectives on systems and practices that, amongst other things, covers the following points relevant to this case:”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a prioritised and comprehensive suite of medication-safety metrics.

Verbatim wording from the response

“programme includes objectives on systems and practices that, amongst other things, covers the following points relevant to this case:”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support the Medicine Safety Improvement Programme to improve medication safety across the pathway, including medication reviews and safe patient discharge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While we do not believe that imposing further requirements to share data are necessary, the Government is committed to supporting the work of the Medicine Safety Improvement Programme⁷, led by NHS England and NHS Improvement, which aims to increase safety across the medication pathway, including in areas such as regular medication reviews and safe patient discharge.”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-care
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There is no national funding to support the rollout of electronic prescribing and medicines administration systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The use of Dictionary of medicines and Devices (dm+d), (a dictionary of descriptions and codes for medicines and devices in use across the NHS), compliant Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) systems makes the process of sending and receiving medicines related information between organisations and health professionals easier and more accurate. It is recognised that this would improve patient safety and hence there is now no national funding to support its roll out. I can confirm that NHS E/I provided funding for an additional 25 Trusts to have EPMA in this last week. The information standards for digital transfer of care do include changes to medicines albeit optional at present. These will be used for the basis for transfer of care in the future (PRSB standards https://theprsb.org/standards/edischarge summary/)”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The local NHS is responsible for reviewing the care provided and implementing any necessary learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I expect the local NHS to consider carefully the care provided to Mr Doyle and to take action where necessary to implement any learnings.”

Source location

2019-0214-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-care
Page 2 · response
Published 23 August 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026