PFD report

Mr Raymond Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Feb 2017•North Wales (Eastern and Central)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a reliable system for delivering histology results to named consultants
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted uponPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Implement Procedure MD23 to mitigate risks from failure to act on diagnostic results.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 February 2017.
  2. Action

    Develop the CHAI Ping electronic reporting solution to alert requesting clinicians, record action taken, and reduce printing of WCP results.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 February 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Following up and acting on histology results remains the ultimate responsibility of the health professional who ordered the investigation.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a reliable system for delivering histology results to named consultants

Wider context from the report

“During the Inquest it became clear that there is no reliable system or protocol for the dissemination of histology results to the named consultant for a patient. In this case the consultant for Mr Edwards informed the inquest that the histology result had gone to the file of Mr Edwards as he had been discharged. He did not chase the result as the operation passed without incident. The Consultant informed the court that had he had the result of histology showing amyloidosis that he would immediately have referred the patient on for urgent investigation of this serious condition. Having had these results at an early stage would have informed the treatment for Mr Edwards subsequently. The fact that this information was not passed in a timely fashion did not cause or contribute to the death of Mr Edwards. However, it is clear that unless there is a clear system for bringing histology results to the attention of a named Consultant that there could be a death in future. The consultant himself identified a need for a more robust system of delivering histology reports to consultants. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon; Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Procedure MD23 to mitigate risks from failure to act on diagnostic results.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of cases where failure to act on findings caused delays in patient treatment a series of meetings were arranged to review current practice and establish consistent and robust systems for disseminating results following examinations and tests. Work was undertaken to develop BCUHB Procedure MD23 ‘Procedure to mitigate the risks due to failure to act on diagnostic results’ based on NPSA 16 guidance. This procedure was approved at the end of 2016 and a copy is in the action plan.”

Source location

2017-0029-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 26 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop the CHAI Ping electronic reporting solution to alert requesting clinicians, record action taken, and reduce printing of WCP results.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To strengthen this process an electronic reporting system with a function to alert the requesting clinician when histology reports are authorised for viewing needs to be made available. Work has begun to develop the CHAI Ping app to provide the solution to the current gap in the WCP of ‘notification’ that a result is available and ‘authorise and recording of action taken’. This would work with the WCP to enable the organisation to improve assurance and stop printing reports for the results in scope i.e. those available to view in the WCP.”

Source location

2017-0029-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 26 February 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Following up and acting on histology results remains the ultimate responsibility of the health professional who ordered the investigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is the ultimate responsibility of the health professional ordering the investigation to follow up the results and to act on them. This has been facilitated by the histology reports being sent to the requesting clinician and not the clinical location of the procedure. However paper histology reports may not reach their intended destination and for this reason all histology reports are also made available to the named Consultant on the Welsh Clinical Portal (WCP).”

Source location

2017-0029-Response-by-University-Health-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 26 February 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026