Linda Christine FARMER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Apr 2025•Northamptonshire

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to investigate care concerns raised by clinicians

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust

    Establish a weekly multidisciplinary review of all Structured Judgement Review outcomes, with resulting actions tracked through to completion.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to investigate care concerns raised by clinicians

Wider context from the report

“Not investigating care concerns raised by clinicians employed by the Trust in August 2023, compounded by not following the recommendation in the Trust's own Structured Judgement Review (2024) to carry out a "detailed investigation" into the care concerns raised. The absence of such investigations, having been identified by Trust processes as having been recommended, means that the care concerns raised have not been investigated, and any underlying system issues contributing to these have not been identified or resolved. This means they are at risk of occurring again, putting patients' lives at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a weekly multidisciplinary review of all Structured Judgement Review outcomes, with resulting actions tracked through to completion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to provide you with the assurance that since this case we have established a robust process in which all SJR outcomes are reviewed in a weekly MDT meeting, with”

Source location

Response from Northampton General Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 11 April 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026