PFD report

Linda Christine FARMER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Apr 2025•Northamptonshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to investigate care concerns raised by clinicians
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to investigate care concerns raised by clinicians

Wider context from the report

“Not investigating care concerns raised by clinicians employed by the Trust in August 2023, compounded by not following the recommendation in the Trust's own Structured Judgement Review (2024) to carry out a "detailed investigation" into the care concerns raised. The absence of such investigations, having been identified by Trust processes as having been recommended, means that the care concerns raised have not been investigated, and any underlying system issues contributing to these have not been identified or resolved. This means they are at risk of occurring again, putting patients' lives at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Establish a weekly multidisciplinary review of all Structured Judgement Review outcomes, with resulting actions tracked through to completion.

    Stated by Northampton General Hospital NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 11 April 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a weekly multidisciplinary review of all Structured Judgement Review outcomes, with resulting actions tracked through to completion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to provide you with the assurance that since this case we have established a robust process in which all SJR outcomes are reviewed in a weekly MDT meeting, with”

Source location

Response from Northampton General Hospital
Page 1 · response
Published 11 April 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026