PFD report

Colin Wiles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Nov 2024•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
22

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to hold Vulnerable Adult Risk Management meetings when there are multifactorial concerns about comorbidities and self neglect
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably identify and escalate self-neglect risksPart of recurring concern: Unreliable coordinated review of vulnerable residents’ support needs
  2. Excessive ambulance patient handover waiting times at Hull Royal Infirmary
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover
  3. Inability to hand over emergency ambulance patients into the emergency department at Hull Royal Infirmary
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handoverPart of recurring concern: Failure to maintain safe hospital patient flowPart of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely hospital admission
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.18

  1. Action

    Implement the Temporary Escalation Space and Boarding SOP to manage capacity challenges, patient boarding, and timely Emergency Department handovers.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  2. Action

    Activate the Ambulance Delay Protocol, including site escalation, rapid patient transfers, and prioritisation of suitable patients.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  3. Action

    Enforce maximum stays of 24 hours in AMU and 12 hours in the Emergency Department to maintain patient flow.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Local and system concerns fall outside NHS England’s national policy and programme remit.

    Stated by NHS EnglandOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to hold Vulnerable Adult Risk Management meetings when there are multifactorial concerns about comorbidities and self neglect

Wider context from the report

“(1) No Vulnerable Adult Risk Management meeting was held despite multifactorial concerns with Mr Wiles’ comorbidities and self neglect leading to poor living conditions and increased risk to his safety ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably identify and escalate self-neglect risks; Unreliable coordinated review of vulnerable residents’ support needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Excessive ambulance patient handover waiting times at Hull Royal Infirmary

Wider context from the report

“(3) The waiting times for ambulances to hand over patients at Hull Royal Infirmary were excessive that day leading to 160 hours of lost ambulance time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inability to hand over emergency ambulance patients into the emergency department at Hull Royal Infirmary

Wider context from the report

“(4) There appears to be an issue with no criteria to reside patients and the ability to hand over patients into ED in Hull Royal Infirmary who arrive in emergency ambulances. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover; Failure to maintain safe hospital patient flow; Failure to provide timely hospital admission.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of criteria to reside for patients arriving in emergency ambulances

Wider context from the report

“(4) There appears to be an issue with no criteria to reside patients and the ability to hand over patients into ED in Hull Royal Infirmary who arrive in emergency ambulances. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unclear advice to callers about calling emergency services back when concerns continue

Wider context from the report

“(2) It does not seem clear whether callers are advised to call the emergency services back if they continue to have concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety-netting advice for patients and carers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Temporary Escalation Space and Boarding SOP to manage capacity challenges, patient boarding, and timely Emergency Department handovers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Between March and April 2023, 20–25% of the Trust's bed base (approximately 180 beds, equivalent to six wards) was occupied by NCTR patients on discharge pathways 1–3. This occupancy severely impacted patient flow and the availability of beds for incoming ED patients. In response, the Trust has undertaken a series of strategic measures to alleviate these pressures. In November 2024 the Trust implemented the Temporary Escalation Space (TES) and Boarding SOP, which provides a framework for managing capacity challenges and improving flow.”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Activate the Ambulance Delay Protocol, including site escalation, rapid patient transfers, and prioritisation of suitable patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Ambulance Delay Protocol Activation: The Ambulance Delay Protocol mandates that ambulance patients should be handed over within 15 minutes of arrival, with no patient waiting longer than 60 minutes. If a delay exceeds 45 minutes with no immediate plan to hand over, the protocol is triggered, requiring:”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enforce maximum stays of 24 hours in AMU and 12 hours in the Emergency Department to maintain patient flow.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Operational Measures from the TES and Boarding SOP:”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use escalation areas and reverse boarding protocols to create immediate capacity for arriving patients.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Utilising escalation areas and reverse boarding protocols to create immediate capacity for new arrivals, as detailed in the policy.”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor ambulance arrivals and Emergency Department capacity in real time and escalate boarding or discharge issues through clinical and senior leadership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Senior Oversight and Escalation:”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct board rounds and huddles to identify discharges early and meet ward discharge targets of 30% by noon and 70% by 17:00.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Boarding Protocols: The SOP outlines structured boarding processes to manage NCTR patients effectively and create capacity in the ED. This includes: - Identifying and moving up to three patients per ward to temporary escalation spaces (TES) or discharge lounges within 30 minutes. - Ensuring timely handovers from ED to inpatient wards to free up ED spaces.”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement Pull for Safety to maintain regular patient flow from the Emergency Department to assessment areas and wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Implementing the Pull for Safety process, which establishes a regular patient flow from the ED to assessment areas and wards.”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the phased 045 Handover Plan to reduce ambulance handover times toward a 45-minute target.

Verbatim wording from the response

“On 9th December 2023, we implemented the 045 Handover Plan at Hull Royal Infirmary, which involves a phased approach to reduce ambulance handover times:”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the operating procedure to offload up to eight ambulances hourly and transfer ten patients from the Emergency Department to inpatient wards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Proactive Patient Flow Management:”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement updated discharge protocols covering local-authority coordination, family and carer involvement, and care transfer hubs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Formal Discharge and Flow Improvements:”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Open and operate a 54-bed NCTR unit to accommodate patients awaiting discharge and reduce reliance on acute beds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Creation of Additional Capacity:”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and renew the VARM procedure into a more contemporary, seamless and accessible Multi Agency Risk Management meeting procedure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The current VARM procedure is available to all professionals and people in the east riding on the ERSAB website and guides them through the processes and paperwork involved (included as appendix 1). Training is provided to practitioners across the health and care system in the east riding on the use of VARM both through the ERSAB and the local authorities internal learning and skills team. To enable development in this area, the ERSAB and ASCH have collaborated with Hull City Council’s safeguarding adults board and Adult Services to review and renew the VARM procedure to contemporise the approach and develop a more seamless and accessible procedure in this geographical area.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider making Multi Agency Risk Management training mandatory for adult social care and health practitioners through the practice development board.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The VARM training is therefore currently under review and will be relaunched following the completion of this work to ensure and enable effective roll out of the new procedure which will be called Multi Agency Risk Management (MARM) meeting procedure. This is expected to be finalised in early 2025. VARM training is not currently a mandatory requirement for staff in ASCH staff however, MARM training being mandatory for practitioners going forward will be considered by the service at our practice development board which is chaired by our Head of Service for Safeguarding and Quality Assurance.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Relaunch risk-management training after the new Multi Agency Risk Management procedure is finalised.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The VARM training is therefore currently under review and will be relaunched following the completion of this work to ensure and enable effective roll out of the new procedure which will be called Multi Agency Risk Management (MARM) meeting procedure. This is expected to be finalised in early 2025. VARM training is not currently a mandatory requirement for staff in ASCH staff however, MARM training being mandatory for practitioners going forward will be considered by the service at our practice development board which is chaired by our Head of Service for Safeguarding and Quality Assurance.”

Source location

Response from East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prioritise improving length of stay for admitted patients, particularly emergency admissions lasting at least one day.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England will also be prioritising:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prioritise reducing delays in urgent and emergency care pathways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England will also be prioritising:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prioritise improving length of stay in NHS-commissioned community beds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England will also be prioritising:”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with trusts and services facing significant ambulance handover challenges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“the community. NHS England are continuing to work with trusts and services with significant handover challenges at the ‘front end’, alongside recognising the importance of reducing length of stay and timely discharge to maintain adequate patient flow and allow new patients to be handed over more promptly to EDs.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local and system concerns fall outside NHS England’s national policy and programme remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My response to the Coroner focuses on those areas of concern that sit within NHS England’s national policy and programme remit. It is appropriate for the other organisations you have addressed your Report to, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and East Riding of Yorkshire Council Adult Social Care and Health, to address the local and system concerns you raise.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The relevant ambulance service must resolve unclear callback instructions locally as a call-handler training issue.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Instructions on worsening conditions, including specifically to call back on 999 should the patient’s condition change or deteriorate, are standard components of the case exit script. If the call is made via a second party, ambulance services should ensure there is a process in place to be assured the caller is able to monitor the condition of the patient, and that they can be called back when the patient is not able to call back or answer a call themselves. If this was not provided in a clear and easy to interpret manner, this is a matter for the relevant ambulance service to resolve locally as a training issue for their call handlers.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Worsening-condition and 999 callback instructions are standard components of the case exit script.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You raised the concern that it does not seem clear whether callers are advised to call the emergency services back if they continue to have concerns.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local organisations should address the local and system concerns raised in the report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My response to the Coroner focuses on those areas of concern that sit within NHS England’s national policy and programme remit. It is appropriate for the other organisations you have addressed your Report to, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and East Riding of Yorkshire Council Adult Social Care and Health, to address the local and system concerns you raise.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Construct the Rossmore Intermediate Care Centre to provide 60 additional short-term rehabilitation and reablement beds.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  2. 2

    Provide senior site-team oversight of capacity risks, ambulance delays, and escalation responses through continuous capacity-and-demand assessment.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  3. 3

    Establish standardised communication arrangements and engage system partners to coordinate decisions, mutual aid, and ambulance operations.

    Stated by NHS Humber Health PartnershipStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  4. 4

    Discuss all Regulation 28 reports through the national working group and share their learning across NHS national and regional levels.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Construct the Rossmore Intermediate Care Centre to provide 60 additional short-term rehabilitation and reablement beds.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Initiated the construction of the Rossmore Intermediate Care Centre, which will provide an additional 60 short-term placement beds for rehabilitation and reablement.”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide senior site-team oversight of capacity risks, ambulance delays, and escalation responses through continuous capacity-and-demand assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Senior Oversight and Escalation: The Site Team plays a critical role in monitoring capacity risks, initiating escalation protocols, and providing leadership to manage ambulance delays. Escalation actions are informed by continuous assessment of capacity and demand, with operational and clinical leadership ensuring rapid responses to emerging pressures.”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish standardised communication arrangements and engage system partners to coordinate decisions, mutual aid, and ambulance operations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Communication and Collaboration:”

Source location

Response from NHS Humber Health Partnership
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss all Regulation 28 reports through the national working group and share their learning across NHS national and regional levels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Colin, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level, and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.”

Source location

Response from NHS England
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026