PFD report

Mr Marriott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Jul 2025•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure of the pre-day-surgery assessment system to require questions about patients' haematological family history
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete clinical history-takingPart of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of patients' clinically relevant medical history
  2. Failure of the pre-day-surgery assessment system to record negative answers about patients' own haematological history
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of patients' clinically relevant medical history
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Add the family-history question to the patient questionnaire through a future questionnaire-service update.

    Stated by Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  2. Action

    Undertake an after-action review to identify how the gap arose and establish learning and remedial actions.

    Stated by Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  3. Action

    Add family-history prompts, including venous thromboembolism, to the pre-operative assessment form.

    Stated by Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 July 2025.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the pre-day-surgery assessment system to require questions about patients' haematological family history

Wider context from the report

“The evidence was that the system which is used for assessment of patients prior to day surgery does not (a) directly require a question to be asked about their haematological family history or (b) record negative answers to the questions related to the patient's own haematological history ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete clinical history-taking; Unreliable recording of patients' clinically relevant medical history.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the pre-day-surgery assessment system to record negative answers about patients' own haematological history

Wider context from the report

“The evidence was that the system which is used for assessment of patients prior to day surgery does not (a) directly require a question to be asked about their haematological family history or (b) record negative answers to the questions related to the patient's own haematological history ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable recording of patients' clinically relevant medical history.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add the family-history question to the patient questionnaire through a future questionnaire-service update.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has not added this question to the patient questionnaire, but this will be completed with a future update of the questionnaire service itself making the whole process easier for patients. This action will be completed by January 2026.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake an after-action review to identify how the gap arose and establish learning and remedial actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition to these urgent clinical and administrative changes, the Trust has also undertaken an After-Action Review to ascertain how this gap was not identified earlier, and to seek recommendations and actions to ensure any learning from the death of a patient is established promptly and action taken.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add family-history prompts, including venous thromboembolism, to the pre-operative assessment form.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The patient questionnaire did not have a place for the patient to enter this important family history. The pre-operative assessment form did not have prompts for the question to be reviewed or asked. The Trust has now added an extra question on the pre-operative assessment ‘power’ form on the Family History Page. The Trust has also included other potential family history that may need further investigation (for example: cardiac, musculoskeletal).”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Make significant family-history responses flow into the anaesthetic assessment and venous thromboembolism form, highlighting them to the anaesthetist.

    Stated by Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  2. 2

    Add the venous thromboembolism form and an incomplete-form indicator to the anaesthetist day-of-surgery workflow.

    Stated by Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 July 2025.
  3. 3

    Discuss the venous thromboembolism family-history issue at the next clinical governance day.

    Stated by Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 July 2025.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make significant family-history responses flow into the anaesthetic assessment and venous thromboembolism form, highlighting them to the anaesthetist.

Verbatim wording from the response

“If a response to this question is added then it will add a "problem" to the record of "Significant Family History" and add the detail of what the issues were.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add the venous thromboembolism form and an incomplete-form indicator to the anaesthetist day-of-surgery workflow.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also added the VTE form and an asterisk indicating that it has not been completed on the Anaesthetist Workflow page for the day of surgery. The anaesthetists have discussed this issue and it is also being discussed at the next clinical governance day.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the venous thromboembolism family-history issue at the next clinical governance day.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have also added the VTE form and an asterisk indicating that it has not been completed on the Anaesthetist Workflow page for the day of surgery. The anaesthetists have discussed this issue and it is also being discussed at the next clinical governance day.”

Source location

Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026