PFD report

Alfie HINTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 2 Dec 2024•West Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
20

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure of communication between consultant obstetric and anaesthetic staff in time critical situations
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable communication and coordination across maternity care providersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff
  2. Failure to assess maternal risks following admission
  3. Absence of local policy directing the approach to time critical obstetric and anaesthetic situations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Develop Human Factors and Ergonomics Training Workshops led by a consultant anaesthetist to address systems and behavioural influences on outcomes.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  2. Action

    Update the Obstetric Cholestasis Guideline with bile-acid-specific delivery timing and urgent senior review requirements for severe disease.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  3. Action

    Embed simulation-based training using obstetric emergencies, incidents, case reviews and patient experience to improve emergency teamwork and learning.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    Existing records, handovers, ward rounds, SBAR communication and coordinator oversight were relied upon to communicate risk and prioritise inductions.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of communication between consultant obstetric and anaesthetic staff in time critical situations

Wider context from the report

“(2) During the course of the Inquest, I heard evidence about the difficulties in communication between the Consultant Obstetrician and Consultant Anaesthetist, with delays being caused by several attempts being made at sitting spinal anaesthetic, against the advice of the Obstetrician and the wishes of the patient, causing distress to staff and patient alike. I heard no evidence of any policy that provided direction or guidance in circumstances such as this. This gives rise to concerns in respect of communication, ongoing risk assessment and an absence of local policy in respect of the approach to be taken in such time critical situations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable communication and coordination across maternity care providers; Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess maternal risks following admission

Wider context from the report

“(1) During the course of the Inquest, I could find no evidence of how or if the maternal risks were assessed following her admission, nor how the level of risk posed by the level of bile acids was communicated to those tasked with prioritising those patients awaiting induction of labour and therefore the allocation of staffing and resources. This is further reflected in the 39 minute delay in CTG monitoring and the fact that at the point Bradycardia was noted, the initial assumption from staff was that there was an issue with the monitoring equipment, there being little awareness of the risks already present, which contributed to delays in expediting delivery. These facts give rise to concerns in respect of the way in which information is gathered and shared within the Maternity Unit and in particular how risk is recorded and communicated between all of those involved in providing intrapartum care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Absence of local policy directing the approach to time critical obstetric and anaesthetic situations

Wider context from the report

“(2) During the course of the Inquest, I heard evidence about the difficulties in communication between the Consultant Obstetrician and Consultant Anaesthetist, with delays being caused by several attempts being made at sitting spinal anaesthetic, against the advice of the Obstetrician and the wishes of the patient, causing distress to staff and patient alike. I heard no evidence of any policy that provided direction or guidance in circumstances such as this. This gives rise to concerns in respect of communication, ongoing risk assessment and an absence of local policy in respect of the approach to be taken in such time critical situations. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to gather, record and communicate intrapartum risk information

Wider context from the report

“(1) During the course of the Inquest, I could find no evidence of how or if the maternal risks were assessed following her admission, nor how the level of risk posed by the level of bile acids was communicated to those tasked with prioritising those patients awaiting induction of labour and therefore the allocation of staffing and resources. This is further reflected in the 39 minute delay in CTG monitoring and the fact that at the point Bradycardia was noted, the initial assumption from staff was that there was an issue with the monitoring equipment, there being little awareness of the risks already present, which contributed to delays in expediting delivery. These facts give rise to concerns in respect of the way in which information is gathered and shared within the Maternity Unit and in particular how risk is recorded and communicated between all of those involved in providing intrapartum care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop Human Factors and Ergonomics Training Workshops led by a consultant anaesthetist to address systems and behavioural influences on outcomes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“6. As explained in evidence to the Inquest, the Trust has developed a programme of Human Factor and Ergonomics Training Workshops, led by a Consultant Anaesthetist, which focuses on systems issues within healthcare and how human behaviours influence outcome and can be modified through systems changes to achieve better clinical outcomes (the principles of such training are explained at Human factors | NHS England | Workforce, training and education).”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Obstetric Cholestasis Guideline with bile-acid-specific delivery timing and urgent senior review requirements for severe disease.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. I can advise that the Obstetric Cholestasis Guideline has been further updated to reflect the updated RCOG green topped guideline. This included guidance on the timing of delivery relating to the specific level of the bile acid results. The guideline states diagnosis of severe ICP would prompt delivery between 35-36 weeks. Diagnosis of severe ICP after 36 weeks would require immediate senior obstetric review and Induction of Labour and the guideline now makes this clear.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed simulation-based training using obstetric emergencies, incidents, case reviews and patient experience to improve emergency teamwork and learning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. As explained in evidence to the Inquest, the Trust has embedded SIMS training – real life Simulation Based Training which is based on obstetric emergencies and scenarios. This is a learning tool used to improve team working in emergency procedures. The SIMS training includes learning from scenarios, incidents, case reviews, patients’ experience and themes and trends across the service to improve learning and reflection. This facilitates constructive feedback to aid teams working together, learning from scenarios and dynamic integration into current themes on the maternity unit.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Strengthen the anaesthesia guideline for Category 1 caesarean sections, including five-minute multidisciplinary review and conversion to general anaesthesia where appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Guideline was revised post Alfie’s case (March 2020 and again in October 2023) and the relevant sections (taken from the version created in October 2023) state:”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Embed multidisciplinary PROMPT training for anaesthetists, obstetricians and midwives using an evidence-based human-factors approach.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of an organic development in health practice but also designed specifically to address the issues which occurred in this present case, particularly focussed on culture, leadership, team working and compliance with national standards, the Trust undertook the following:”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a risk-based RAG rating system to standardise prioritisation of induction-of-labour cases.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The prioritisation process and proforma formalises the process of patient management and priority according to individualised patient risk and provides a living record of priority to evidence why one patient is scored above another. It reflects MDT agreement as to priority.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and publish an induction-of-labour process map covering activity assessment, escalation, safeguards against delay and multidisciplinary prioritisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Process – Induction of Labour Management”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement an Induction of Labour Prioritisation Proforma to record risks, prioritisation decisions, multidisciplinary agreement and delays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It was however explained in evidence that as a result of the events in this case and in response to the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (‘HSIB’) independent investigation into the circumstances of this case, the Trust has developed and implemented an Induction of Labour Prioritisation Proforma, to highlight risks and associated priority of women attending for induction of labour. The Trust supplied the Coroner with the proforma and this details the following guidance:”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and publish a Category 1 caesarean section and fetal bradycardia process map covering escalation, anaesthetic decisions, effective anaesthesia and delivery timelines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Process – Category 1 Caesarean Section / Fetal Bradycardia”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing records, handovers, ward rounds, SBAR communication and coordinator oversight were relied upon to communicate risk and prioritise inductions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As to the specific issue of how risk factors are communicated, every expectant mother admitted to the maternity unit would be under the care of an obstetric consultant and/or midwife and those clinicians would bear responsibility for knowing the patient’s history and presentation and to review and complete the patient’s record, which would contain all such information.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The delay in commencing induction was considered reasonable because unit activity prevented accommodating the patient earlier.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We also observe at this stage that LW Coordinator, BB, gave evidence to the inquest to the effect that she was fully aware of Mrs Hinton and her clinical condition throughout the day shift of 09.05.19 and that she was communicating with the Obstetric Consultant with regards to patient acuity on the unit to determine the point at which it was safe to offer Mrs Hinton IOL, which was agreed shortly after 18:00 hours on 09.05.19.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The case was not considered to require emergency caesarean delivery at admission, a view supported by independent reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In Mrs Hinton’s case, on 08.05.19, it was promptly recognised by the admitting Consultant Obstetrician that her bile acids were very significantly elevated and that she was suffering from Obstetric Cholestasis.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.11

  1. 1

    Maintain compliance with the Maternity Incentive Scheme’s core maternity safety actions.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  2. 2

    Introduce cross-disciplinary Quality Safety Summits to support wider learning and ongoing quality and safety improvement.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  3. 3

    Implement the action plan arising from the HSIB investigation and revise it in response to HSIB recommendations.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  4. 4

    Implement the Compassionate and Inclusive Leadership with Accountability programme for multiprofessional organisational leaders.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  5. 5

    Implement recommendations from the external review of maternity services through a dedicated improvement project.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  6. 6

    Implement the Perinatal Culture Leadership programme’s feedback, coaching and action-planning work across the maternity leadership quadrumvirate.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  7. 7

    Continue benchmarking the Trust through partnerships with other healthcare providers and engagement with regulators on compliance and best practice.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  8. 8

    Pilot the GMC Professional Behaviours and Patient Safety Programme to develop culture change and address unprofessional behaviour.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  9. 9

    Introduce the Maternity Escalation of Clinical Concerns Guideline with agreed processes for staff to raise clinical concerns.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  10. 10

    Operate embedded clinical incident reporting with weekly adverse-event meetings and Trust oversight to identify themes and trigger action.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.
  11. 11

    Transition to Learn from Patient Safety Events and the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework to strengthen learning and safety culture.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 2 December 2024.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    A local anaesthesia guideline already governed anaesthetic choice and circumstances requiring conversion from spinal to general anaesthesia.

    Stated by Airedale NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain compliance with the Maternity Incentive Scheme’s core maternity safety actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The Trust is fully compliant with the Maternity Incentive Scheme, as operated by NHS Resolution on behalf of the Department of Health and Social Care. As part of this assurance programme, the Trust has had to evidence the implementation of a set of core safety actions, ultimately aiming to improve the quality of care for women, families and newborns. There are ten standardised safety actions in the scheme which have been agreed by senior (external) clinicians to help drive improvements in maternity, with a significant element of the actions targeting safety and culture. (Maternity Incentive Scheme - NHS Resolution)”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce cross-disciplinary Quality Safety Summits to support wider learning and ongoing quality and safety improvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“12. As explained in evidence to the Inquest, Quality Safety Summits have been introduced across all disciplines in the Trust. This has assisted with wider learning across all disciplines particularly when cases have required input from other specialities. This has assisted as a mechanism to improve wider leaning and ongoing quality and safety improvements. Maternity contributes to this process given the complexities of women accessing the services and the requirements for multi-disciplinary engagement.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the action plan arising from the HSIB investigation and revise it in response to HSIB recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- We reported the case to the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (‘HSIB’) on 16 May 2019 in order that it may undertake an independent investigation into the circumstances of the case and to identify learning and propose any safety recommendations; - With knowledge that the HSIB could take up to nine months (at the time) to provide a report to support learning, we undertook our own concurrent, internal investigation in case any more urgent actions were required and we produced an Action Plan as part of that process. - On receipt of the HSIB report in December 2019, we accepted its recommendations in full and made revisions to the Action Plan in response, and implemented the same; - We carefully considered the independent expert report which the Coroner had obtained from Professor Draycott, Consultant Obstetrician and also accepted his recommendations in full.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Compassionate and Inclusive Leadership with Accountability programme for multiprofessional organisational leaders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“7. Compassionate and Inclusive Leadership with Accountability - leaders across the organisation participated in this multiprofessional programme led by HealthSciences.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement recommendations from the external review of maternity services through a dedicated improvement project.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8. The external review of maternity services – the purpose of which was to provide external review of the service in order to provide external assurance and opinion, identify areas of good practice and provide any recommendations for improvement. The methodology firstly included a tabletop review of Trust self-assessment against CQC’s key lines of enquiry (‘KLOE’), minutes from governance meetings, TOR, completed RCA’s and consultant job plans. This was then followed up by a two-day on-site visit which included discussions with members of the team. It was followed by a report incorporating findings and recommendations, which are subject to a specific project of implementation, many recommendations having already been implemented.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the Perinatal Culture Leadership programme’s feedback, coaching and action-planning work across the maternity leadership quadrumvirate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. Perinatal Culture Leadership programme – the Trust attended the Perinatal Culture Leadership Training programme in 2024. The Perinatal Quadrumvirate consists of Midwifery, Obstetrics, Neonates and Operational Management. The programme has consisted of understanding behaviours and cultures. 360-degree feedback and coaching was included within the programme. A SCORE Survey was completed in April 2024 and the report received in the Trust in October 2024. Teams are currently drilling down into the feedback and producing an action plan. Updates are presented to Quality and Safety Committee, Trust Board and Safety Champions.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue benchmarking the Trust through partnerships with other healthcare providers and engagement with regulators on compliance and best practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In summary, the organisation aims to meet the challenges around workplace culture and MDT collaboration head on and has undertaken an extensive programme of work to address and validate this area and will continue to do so.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Pilot the GMC Professional Behaviours and Patient Safety Programme to develop culture change and address unprofessional behaviour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. GMC Professional Behaviours and Patient Safety Programme – the Trust entered into an agreement with the GMC to pilot a scheme designed to help organisations develop culture change and address unprofessional behaviours in clinical practice and to engender just and fair culture.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce the Maternity Escalation of Clinical Concerns Guideline with agreed processes for staff to raise clinical concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“10. As provided in evidence to the Inquest, the Maternity Department has introduced (issued May 2023) a guideline ‘Maternity Escalation of Clinical Concerns Maternity Services’, which is designed to empower all staff members to raise clinical concerns and have agreed escalation processes in place. It incorporates the escalation toolkit provided by RCOG (2022) as part of their ‘Each Baby Counts: Learn + Support’ guidance (Each Baby Counts: Learn & Support | RCOG).”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate embedded clinical incident reporting with weekly adverse-event meetings and Trust oversight to identify themes and trigger action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“11. As explained in evidence to the Inquest, clinical incident reporting is an embedded mechanism highlighting themes of clinical adverse events, in real time. The Division have weekly meetings to discuss any AEF’s completed. This assists with early identification of themes, quality and safety and performance concerns and triggers for any immediate action and learning. This AEF reporting process has the wider Trust oversight.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Transition to Learn from Patient Safety Events and the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework to strengthen learning and safety culture.

Verbatim wording from the response

“9. The Trust was an early adopter of transitioning to Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) and the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) to improve learning and safety culture, moving away from root cause analysis which is much less effective in complex health systems.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 9 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A local anaesthesia guideline already governed anaesthetic choice and circumstances requiring conversion from spinal to general anaesthesia.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In effect at the time of this case, the Trust’s ‘Anaesthesia for Category 1 Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LCSC) guideline’ (2016) [pages 1589 – 1596 of the inquest bundle] advised that the anaesthetist has overall responsibility to decide on the method of anaesthesia.”

Source location

Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 2 December 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026