PFD report

Huseyin Hasan Erdogan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Feb 2015•North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to complete steps in the Haringey Crisis Resolution Team action plan
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to implement identified safety actions
  2. Delays in completing outstanding action-plan steps
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to implement identified safety actions
  3. Failure to complete steps in the first action plan
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to implement identified safety actions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete steps in the Haringey Crisis Resolution Team action plan

Wider context from the report

“(2) Although the Haringey Crisis Resolution Team (SUI) Action plan likewise set out nine steps to be taken (some of which corresponded very closely with those set out in the first Action Plan), and likewise set a “Date to be completed” of “November 2014”, there was, again, no evidence before me at the inquest that items numbers 1, and 3 to 9 had been completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement identified safety actions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in completing outstanding action-plan steps

Wider context from the report

“(3) The risk of further deaths not being prevented will not be diminished if all outstanding steps have not already been completed, and if they are not completed without avoidable delay. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement identified safety actions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to complete steps in the first action plan

Wider context from the report

“(1) Although the first Action Plan set out six steps to be taken as “Action in Response to recommendations” and, although the “Date to be completed” for items 1 to 5 was stated to be “November 2014” there was, by the date of the inquest (over two months later) no evidence before me that any of those five steps had been completed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement identified safety actions.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.