PFD report

Kenton Clete BEASLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Feb 2025•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure of the online licence checker to reflect a driver’s authorised driving status
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate driver licensing controls for road safety
  2. Failure to ensure required medical information is received and accepted in the required format
  3. Failure to identify and respond appropriately to vulnerable licence applicants
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the online licence checker to reflect a driver’s authorised driving status

Wider context from the report

“In the period Sep 23-Mar 24, whilst verbally informed that he was able to drive under s.88 RTA 1988, the online checker was showing his licence to have expired, hence over 20 potential employers refused to hire him, notwithstanding his attempts to explain s.88. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate driver licensing controls for road safety.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure required medical information is received and accepted in the required format

Wider context from the report

“There was a lengthy and unnecessarily protracted period (8 Sep 23 – 12 Mar 24) in which Mr Beasley was attempting to renew his licence, which meant he was unable to secure professional HGV driver employment. The following individual events and consequent frustrations exacerbated Mr Beasley’s poor mental state: • DVLA wrote to his GP on 11 October 2023 and the GP surgery responded with the information they believed was required on 18 October 2023. • In a call from Mr Beasley to DVLA of 30 Nov 23 it was apparently confirmed that DVLA had all the necessary information and a ‘DVLA Doctor’ decision would be forthcoming soon. • It then transpired that was not the case and more or different information was required. There was then a further delay in securing another GP appointment. • Despite that second GP appointment being booked for 10 Jan 24, the DVLA questionnaire was never received by the GP. • Despite a GP letter sent after that appointment confirming no concerns at Mr Beasley’s physical or mental health in terms of fitness to drive, this was rejected because it did not contain the information in questionnaire format. • It appears to have taken the intervention of his then MP, Greg Clarke, to unlock the impasse. • There was a delay in booking a further GP appointment in Feb 24. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to identify and respond appropriately to vulnerable licence applicants

Wider context from the report

“He was frequently unable to get through via the telephone advice service. Mr Beasley had attempted telephone contact on multiple occasions, but calls went unanswered and unattended. • Even though an individual medical caseworker was assigned, Mr Beasley’s experience was that contact was still difficult and sporadic and he was constantly chasing rather than being kept informed. • On some occasions when he made telephone contact he was in tears of frustration but no vulnerable customer protocol appears to have been followed, nor was there any attempt to expedite his application or provide a fuller explanation as to the delay. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of reliable telephone and caseworker contact during licence applications

Wider context from the report

“He was frequently unable to get through via the telephone advice service. Mr Beasley had attempted telephone contact on multiple occasions, but calls went unanswered and unattended. • Even though an individual medical caseworker was assigned, Mr Beasley’s experience was that contact was still difficult and sporadic and he was constantly chasing rather than being kept informed. • On some occasions when he made telephone contact he was in tears of frustration but no vulnerable customer protocol appears to have been followed, nor was there any attempt to expedite his application or provide a fuller explanation as to the delay. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays in processing driving licence renewals

Wider context from the report

“There was a lengthy and unnecessarily protracted period (8 Sep 23 – 12 Mar 24) in which Mr Beasley was attempting to renew his licence, which meant he was unable to secure professional HGV driver employment. The following individual events and consequent frustrations exacerbated Mr Beasley’s poor mental state: • DVLA wrote to his GP on 11 October 2023 and the GP surgery responded with the information they believed was required on 18 October 2023. • In a call from Mr Beasley to DVLA of 30 Nov 23 it was apparently confirmed that DVLA had all the necessary information and a ‘DVLA Doctor’ decision would be forthcoming soon. • It then transpired that was not the case and more or different information was required. There was then a further delay in securing another GP appointment. • Despite that second GP appointment being booked for 10 Jan 24, the DVLA questionnaire was never received by the GP. • Despite a GP letter sent after that appointment confirming no concerns at Mr Beasley’s physical or mental health in terms of fitness to drive, this was rejected because it did not contain the information in questionnaire format. • It appears to have taken the intervention of his then MP, Greg Clarke, to unlock the impasse. • There was a delay in booking a further GP appointment in Feb 24. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide timely explanations for licence delays and removal decisions

Wider context from the report

“Mr Beasley had been unable to find out the reason for the delay, nor was he informed until late in the process what the original reason for removal of his licence had been. • It eventually transpired that this arose due to a previous attempt at self-harm over twenty years earlier, since and despite which he had driven professionally for many years. It was never made clear why this was so. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026