PFD report

Louise Helen Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Jun 2024•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of GP practice policy for co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate guidance for safe opioid prescribing
  2. Unavailability of practice warning flags at the three-month stage of morphine prescribing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to identify clinically significant medication risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safeguards against misuse of medicines with abuse potential
  3. Lack of GP practice policy for long-term opioid prescribing
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate guidance for safe opioid prescribing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Raise opioid prescribing as a significant event for practice-wide consideration.

    Stated by Petroc Group PracticeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 June 2024.
  2. Action

    Develop a comprehensive practice policy for opioid prescribing.

    Stated by Petroc Group PracticeStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 June 2024.
  3. Action

    Discuss the opioid prescribing policy and its application at the scheduled practice-wide meeting, then circulate the minutes and policy to staff.

    Stated by Petroc Group PracticeStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of GP practice policy for co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines

Wider context from the report

“(4) There was no policy in place at the GP practice regarding co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines, to reflect the MHRA/CHM advice referred to in NICE guidance regarding the increased risk of respiratory depression and death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate guidance for safe opioid prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of practice warning flags at the three-month stage of morphine prescribing

Wider context from the report

“(3) There were no warning flags in place at the practice at the 3-month stage of morphine prescription, to reflect the MHRA/CHM advice referred to in NICE guidance, regarding the increased risk of addiction beyond this period. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks; Inadequate safeguards against misuse of medicines with abuse potential.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of GP practice policy for long-term opioid prescribing

Wider context from the report

“(2) There was no policy in place at the GP practice regarding long term (longer than 3 months) prescription of opioids. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate guidance for safe opioid prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to agree an opioid treatment strategy and end-of-treatment plan before starting opioids

Wider context from the report

“(1) There was no agreement with Louise before starting opioids, regarding a treatment strategy and plan for end of treatment as recommended by NICE. There was no practice policy requiring such an agreement. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of practice policy requiring agreement of an opioid treatment strategy and end-of-treatment plan

Wider context from the report

“(1) There was no agreement with Louise before starting opioids, regarding a treatment strategy and plan for end of treatment as recommended by NICE. There was no practice policy requiring such an agreement. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate guidance for safe opioid prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise opioid prescribing as a significant event for practice-wide consideration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Significant Event Discussion: We have raised this as a significant event and will discuss it at our next practice-wide meeting, scheduled for the 19th of September. During this meeting, we will cover the new policy and how it pertains to our approach to new and ongoing prescriptions for opioids. Minutes and copies of the policy will be circulated afterwards and made available to all staff.”

Source location

Response from Petroc Group
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a comprehensive practice policy for opioid prescribing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the points raised in the PFD report, we have developed a comprehensive practice policy for opioid prescribing. We believe this policy addresses points 1 to 4 in the report.”

Source location

Response from Petroc Group
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the opioid prescribing policy and its application at the scheduled practice-wide meeting, then circulate the minutes and policy to staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Significant Event Discussion: We have raised this as a significant event and will discuss it at our next practice-wide meeting, scheduled for the 19th of September. During this meeting, we will cover the new policy and how it pertains to our approach to new and ongoing prescriptions for opioids. Minutes and copies of the policy will be circulated afterwards and made available to all staff.”

Source location

Response from Petroc Group
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Review all patients prescribed strong opioids every six months in accordance with the new policy.

    Stated by Petroc Group PracticeStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 June 2024.
  2. 2

    Search for non-malignant patients prescribed strong opioids, identify those lacking six-month medication reviews, and bring them in for review under the new policy.

    Stated by Petroc Group PracticeStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 June 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review all patients prescribed strong opioids every six months in accordance with the new policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Moving forward, all patients on strong opioids will be reviewed on a six-month basis as per this policy. We believe these actions will significantly enhance our prescribing practices and ensure patient safety. We are committed to continuous improvement and welcome any further recommendations you may have.”

Source location

Response from Petroc Group
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Search for non-malignant patients prescribed strong opioids, identify those lacking six-month medication reviews, and bring them in for review under the new policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. Patient Review: We will run a search on all patients currently prescribed strong opioids who do not have a malignant diagnosis. We will identify any patients who have not had a review of their medication in the last six months and bring them in for a review in the context of this new practice policy.”

Source location

Response from Petroc Group
Page 1 · response
Published 25 June 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026