PFD report

Marcus Anthony Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 May 2018•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of restrictor devices on large lounge windows
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate window fall-prevention controls in residential accommodation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Follow up urgently with Estata on window surveys, restrictor repairs or replacements, and confirmation of completion and health-and-safety reporting.

    Stated by Radcliffe Investments LimitedStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 July 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Maintenance of windows and common parts is contractually assigned to Mill 39, with Estata responsible for carrying out those obligations.

    Stated by Radcliffe Investments LimitedRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of restrictor devices on large lounge windows

Wider context from the report

“(1) The large window in the lounge of flat ████████ has no restrictor device fitted. In consequence it can open to a position which necessitated a person leaning out of the window in order to close it. This was considered by witnesses to create a hazard involving a risk that a person may fall when attempting to close the window. It may be that other windows in the flat complex also have the same potential hazard. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate window fall-prevention controls in residential accommodation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Follow up urgently with Estata on window surveys, restrictor repairs or replacements, and confirmation of completion and health-and-safety reporting.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having carefully considered your report, ████████ requested that an urgent survey of all windows at the development be carried out by Estata to check for restrictors and for them to be fitted wherever they were either not present or found to be faulty. As at the time of writing this letter, Estata have confirmed that it has completed its survey of all of the windows at the development and in a number of instances restrictors are missing or broken. ████████ asked Estata not to delay the remedial works pending completion of all surveys and that it should immediately install any missing restrictors and replace those found to be broken or faulty.”

Source location

2018-0144-Response-by-Estates-Management-Limited
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintenance of windows and common parts is contractually assigned to Mill 39, with Estata responsible for carrying out those obligations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our client, Radcliffe Investments, acquired the freehold interest in Whingate Mill on 1 August 2017, which comprises 39 residential apartments held by leaseholders on long leases and which was converted in around 2017. The leases are made between 3 contractual parties including the landlord, leaseholder and a management company, Mill 39 (Management) Limited (“Mill 39”). Pursuant to the terms of the long leases, Mill 39 is contractually responsible for the maintenance of the structure, exterior and common parts of the development, including the windows. We should point out that our client was not made aware of the tragic incident at the time of acquisition and was unaware until your letter notified us.”

Source location

2018-0144-Response-by-Estates-Management-Limited
Page 1 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Write to all leaseholders to record subletting and occupancy details and reinforce reporting of safety defects to Estata.

    Stated by Radcliffe Investments LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  2. 2

    Seek regular updates on the application to reinstate Mill 39.

    Stated by Radcliffe Investments LimitedStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  3. 3

    Provide further training to teams addressing the identified communication failure.

    Stated by Radcliffe Investments LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Write to all leaseholders to record subletting and occupancy details and reinforce reporting of safety defects to Estata.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Radcliffe Investments will also be writing to all leaseholders at the development to remind them that they should notify the landlord of any subletting arrangements and register details of their subtenant with us so that there is a record of occupancy and assisting Estata with the day to day management of the development and to ensure that leaseholders’ tenants understand they should notify Estata immediately regarding all defects or issues.”

Source location

2018-0144-Response-by-Estates-Management-Limited
Page 3 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Seek regular updates on the application to reinstate Mill 39.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. Mill 39 is to be reinstated by its former directors – ████████ has been advised by Estata that Milners solicitors have provided the necessary paperwork to the directors of Mill 39 to enable the company to be reinstated. Philip will be seeking regular updates on the progress of the reinstatement application.”

Source location

2018-0144-Response-by-Estates-Management-Limited
Page 3 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide further training to teams addressing the identified communication failure.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are very sorry to hear of the tragic incident that took place at 34 Whingate Mill last year. We thank you for drawing this matter to our attention and I do apologise that your initial letters were not passed to our legal department or a member of the senior management team as they should have been. Please be assured that further training has been provided to our teams in order to address this.”

Source location

2018-0144-Response-by-Estates-Management-Limited
Page 1 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026