PFD report

Stephen Mark AMER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 25 Jul 2014•Hertfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
0

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

No concerns are currently included for this report.

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Develop and introduce a consent form enabling patient information to be shared with social care services.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 July 2014.
  2. 2

    Share the coroner’s conclusions with local hospital trusts to encourage sufficient time for face-to-face discharge discussions with relatives and carers.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 July 2014.
  3. 3

    Share revised carer-assessment and discharge requirements with health partners and request equivalent practice for relevant hospital discharges.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 July 2014.
  4. 4

    Share the coroner’s observations and recommendations with other local authorities through adult social services practice-development meetings.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 25 July 2014.
  5. 5

    Issue a practice instruction requiring separate carer assessments covering decision impacts, required support and contingency plans.

    Stated by Hertfordshire County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 25 July 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and introduce a consent form enabling patient information to be shared with social care services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“During the inquest, ████████ ████████ referred to a new protocol which was being developed with our health partners. We entirely agree with your recommendation that consent arrangements should be included to allow patient information to be shared with social care services (your first bullet point on page 2 of your letter).”

Source location

2014-0344-Response-by-Hertfordshire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 25 July 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the coroner’s conclusions with local hospital trusts to encourage sufficient time for face-to-face discharge discussions with relatives and carers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The method of communication must indeed be considered carefully (your third recommendation). Whilst carers and relatives may choose not to take up the opportunity of a face to face meeting to discuss discharge arrangements, this remains the preferred and most effective method of communicating care arrangements. This arrangement provides a better opportunity to discuss and clarify every aspect of care and any associated concerns. It is recognised that mounting pressure on NHS hospital beds can result in very limited notice of discharge. We will share your conclusions with local hospital trusts in an effort to ensure that they allow sufficient time to discuss discharges with relatives / carers face to face.”

Source location

2014-0344-Response-by-Hertfordshire-County-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 25 July 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share revised carer-assessment and discharge requirements with health partners and request equivalent practice for relevant hospital discharges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The County Council will share this new requirement with health colleagues and request that they follow the same practice when they arrange hospital discharges of vulnerable patients or carers outside of social care referral arrangements.”

Source location

2014-0344-Response-by-Hertfordshire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 25 July 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the coroner’s observations and recommendations with other local authorities through adult social services practice-development meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to thank you for your recommendations which we formally accept. We will introduce the revised arrangements outlined above and will share these with our health partners within Hertfordshire. We will also take the opportunity to share your observations and recommendations more widely with other local authorities through the network of practice development meetings organised by the Association of Adult Social Services.”

Source location

2014-0344-Response-by-Hertfordshire-County-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 25 July 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a practice instruction requiring separate carer assessments covering decision impacts, required support and contingency plans.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We also understand that where there is a change of plan, in this case, reflecting the clearly expressed wish of Mrs Amer that she wished to return to her home, that the change of plan is given to the relevant person, in particular the carer. I refer to your second bullet point on page 2 of your letter and in the light of this tragic case, the department has issued a practice instruction to social care staff to create or update a separate carer’s assessment. This must consider the impact of the decision on the carer and set out in detail the support they will require to continue caring if that is their wish. The assessment must also address contingency plans if for any reason they become unable to care for the vulnerable person.”

Source location

2014-0344-Response-by-Hertfordshire-County-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 25 July 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026