PFD report

Yasmin Louise ADAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Jun 2024•Derby and Derbyshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Presence of fixed shower rails creating ligature points in prisoner-accessible shower areas
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments
  2. Failure of ACCT observation scheduling to avoid overly long gaps
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
  3. Failure to use appropriate cells for ACCT prisoners subject to cellular confinement
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Implement ACCT version 6 to support person-centred, multidisciplinary case management.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 June 2024.
  2. Action

    Convert cells in older prisons to ligature-resistant standards through the estate-wide programme.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 26 June 2024.
  3. Action

    Produce guidance on ACCT ongoing records and observation timing to support staff in completing checks safely.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 June 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Cellular confinement does not itself require a specialist cell because not all prisoners undergoing it are at risk of self-harm.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Presence of fixed shower rails creating ligature points in prisoner-accessible shower areas

Wider context from the report

“2. The inquest heard that HMP Foston Hall no longer has fixed shower rails in prisoner’s cell bathroom areas. It could not be confirmed to the court that other prisons across the prion estate do not have fixed shower rails in prisoner’s cell bathroom areas, or other shower areas where prisoners may be out of view of staff. Although potential ligature points are multiple within prisons, and cannot totally be eliminated, fixed shower rails present particular and clear risk of use as ligature points. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of ACCT observation scheduling to avoid overly long gaps

Wider context from the report

“1. Immediately prior to Yasmin’s death there had been a gap of twenty-nine minutes in her ACCT observations and at the time she was subject to four checks per hour. The relevant guidance for ACCT observation checks understandably states that the checks should not take place at set time to lessen the chances of a prisoner being able to predict when observations will occur, but the guidance does not advise avoiding overly long gaps between observation (e.g. twenty-nine minutes as in Yasmin’s case). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to use appropriate cells for ACCT prisoners subject to cellular confinement

Wider context from the report

“4. Yasmin was subject to cellular confinement on a residential prison wing. ‘Normal’ or ‘standard’ cells may not be best for cellular confinement, particularly for a prisoner placed on an ACCT and therefore deemed at risk and vulnerable, due to cell environment and ligature points and less ability to check and observe by prison staff. It is unclear whether appropriate cells are now used for placement of prisoners subject to ACCTS who are also subject to cellular confinement, across the prison estate. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of prison staff training and awareness on personality disorder and learning disability

Wider context from the report

“3. There was lack of clarity concerning what training and awareness prison staff receive on personality disorder. Yasmin was diagnosed with emotionally unstable personality disorder which could make her behaviour impulsive, and unpredictable. She had also been diagnosed with learning disability in the community which was relevant to her understanding and communication with her. I have been provided with the training course slides for Introduction to Mental Health Awareness, produced by HMPPS Learning and Development in conjunction with the National Psychology Service. I am informed that this course is delivered to prison officer staff generally. There is nothing on the slides to indicate that the course covers personality disorder or learning disability. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to recognise and respond to prisoners’ disability and neurodiversity-related needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement ACCT version 6 to support person-centred, multidisciplinary case management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In April 2021, as part of a wider organisational change, HMP Foston Hall implemented ACCT version 6. The new version of the ACCT document was developed following a review of the previous version, and is designed to encourage a person-centred and multidisciplinary case management approach. In addition to the introduction of the new document, guidance documents that focus on various aspects including the ongoing record were produced to assist staff in conducting their duties. The ongoing record guidance clearly explains that observations should not be predictable but should be completed within a reasonable time frame to ensure there are not long gaps between checks and provides examples of such.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 26 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Convert cells in older prisons to ligature-resistant standards through the estate-wide programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A ligature-resistant (LR) cell is one from which as many ligature points as possible have been removed, through the design and installation of furniture and fittings. This includes the door and window, electrical, heating and sanitary fittings, and other features such as shower curtain rails. Our long-term aim is to ensure that LR cells are available as an option for staff managing prisoners in crisis, and that they retain those features in full working order and do not deviate from the standard over time. All new prisons and major additions, such as new wings, are usually”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 26 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Produce guidance on ACCT ongoing records and observation timing to support staff in completing checks safely.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In April 2021, as part of a wider organisational change, HMP Foston Hall implemented ACCT version 6. The new version of the ACCT document was developed following a review of the previous version, and is designed to encourage a person-centred and multidisciplinary case management approach. In addition to the introduction of the new document, guidance documents that focus on various aspects including the ongoing record were produced to assist staff in conducting their duties. The ongoing record guidance clearly explains that observations should not be predictable but should be completed within a reasonable time frame to ensure there are not long gaps between checks and provides examples of such.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 26 June 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Cellular confinement does not itself require a specialist cell because not all prisoners undergoing it are at risk of self-harm.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cellular confinement is essentially the same process as segregation, except that it does not involve moving the prisoner to a dedicated segregation area. It does not of itself require a specialist cell, since not all prisoners undergoing cellular confinement will be at risk of self-harm. If that risk exists and it includes an increased risk of ligaturing, the prisoner can be moved to an LR cell where one is available. An alternative is a move to the segregation area, however this must be the exception for prisoners being supported through ACCT; and as segregation units are not required to have any LR accommodation, this may not be suitable.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 26 June 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026