PFD report

Margaret Ann Waylett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 Dec 2023•East London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Confusion between doctors about responsibility for patients with dual orthopaedic and medical needs
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain clear clinical responsibility for patient carePart of recurring concern: Failure to provide continuity of patient care
  2. Dangerously inadequate junior orthopaedic staffing levels
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient carePart of recurring concern: Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity
  3. Failure of orthogeriatricians to review patients without an orthopaedic referral
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Escalate orthopaedic patients with clinical concerns to the on-call medical, Critical Care Outreach or intensive care teams for support and further management.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  2. Action

    Display on-call doctors’ contact information in relevant clinical areas.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  3. Action

    Increase laptop and iPad availability, verify Cerner compatibility and functionality, and provide computers on wheels for NEWS access.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Existing access arrangements are considered sufficient to enable doctors to review NEWS data in each clinical area.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Confusion between doctors about responsibility for patients with dual orthopaedic and medical needs

Wider context from the report

“(3) The inquest heard that there was confusion between the doctors as to who was responsible for the patient, in light of her dual orthopaedic and medical needs. Orthogeriatricians were aware of Mrs Waylett’s desaturation on 19 October 2022, but appeared to have considered it necessary for them to receive a referral from the orthopaedic team before they could carry out a review. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain clear clinical responsibility for patient care; Failure to provide continuity of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dangerously inadequate junior orthopaedic staffing levels

Wider context from the report

“(1) The inquest heard that nursing staff requested reviews by the on-call orthopaedic doctors on multiple occasions, without the doctors attending to carry out a review. A junior doctor described the junior orthopaedic staffing levels in the hospital as “dangerous”. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient medical staffing capacity for timely patient care; Insufficient qualified healthcare staffing capacity.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of orthogeriatricians to review patients without an orthopaedic referral

Wider context from the report

“(3) The inquest heard that there was confusion between the doctors as to who was responsible for the patient, in light of her dual orthopaedic and medical needs. Orthogeriatricians were aware of Mrs Waylett’s desaturation on 19 October 2022, but appeared to have considered it necessary for them to receive a referral from the orthopaedic team before they could carry out a review. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of readily accessible NEWS charts and scores during ward rounds

Wider context from the report

“(2) The inquest heard that the NEWS charts were not available on the ward rounds. The consultants did not therefore review the charts and were unaware of the frequently raised NEWS scores. The inquest heard that laptops on the ward were unwieldy and time consuming. There were no iPads or vital packs available for the ward team to easily access the NEWS scores. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of on-call orthopaedic doctors to attend requested reviews

Wider context from the report

“(1) The inquest heard that nursing staff requested reviews by the on-call orthopaedic doctors on multiple occasions, without the doctors attending to carry out a review. A junior doctor described the junior orthopaedic staffing levels in the hospital as “dangerous”. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide requested on-call clinical review.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Escalate orthopaedic patients with clinical concerns to the on-call medical, Critical Care Outreach or intensive care teams for support and further management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The interaction and interface between the orthopaedic and orthogeriatric teams has been reviewed and updated, to ensure that there is no misunderstanding and that no patient who would benefit from a medical assessment is missed. Junior doctors in both teams have clear and defined roles and responsibilities designed to ensure patients get the attention that is needed. Any patient under the care of the Orthopaedic team for who there is a clinical concern is escalated to either the On call medical team or the Critical Care Outreach team and intensive care for support and further management.”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Display on-call doctors’ contact information in relevant clinical areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A new process has been introduced, in which contact information for on call doctors is displayed in relevant clinical areas so that there is complete clarity about who should be contacted.”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase laptop and iPad availability, verify Cerner compatibility and functionality, and provide computers on wheels for NEWS access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The above has been supported by laptop and iPad device availability which has been increased, with devices having been tested and confirmed as compatible with Cerner and functional for use. Computers on wheels are also available for use.”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the orthopaedic–orthogeriatric interface and define junior doctors’ roles and responsibilities for patient assessment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The interaction and interface between the orthopaedic and orthogeriatric teams has been reviewed and updated, to ensure that there is no misunderstanding and that no patient who would benefit from a medical assessment is missed. Junior doctors in both teams have clear and defined roles and responsibilities designed to ensure patients get the attention that is needed. Any patient under the care of the Orthopaedic team for who there is a clinical concern is escalated to either the On call medical team or the Critical Care Outreach team and intensive care for support and further management.”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing access arrangements are considered sufficient to enable doctors to review NEWS data in each clinical area.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The senior medical leadership team in the hospital have made it clear to all doctors in the service that regular review of NEWS data is part of professional standards. A review has confirmed that there is enough access to ensure that this happens in each clinical area.”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Senior doctors consider staffing levels appropriate, disputing that junior orthopaedic staffing levels were dangerous.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. Concern: The inquest heard that nursing staff requested reviews by the on-call orthopaedic doctors on multiple occasions, without the doctors attending to carry out a review. A junior doctor described the junior orthopaedic staffing levels in the hospital as “dangerous”.”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Present evidence of completed actions to the Whipps Cross Quality and Safety Committee and Trust Quality Assurance Committee.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  2. 2

    Consider expanding the orthogeriatric service to provide cover for all frailty fractures.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 28 December 2023.
  3. 3

    Reinforce regular NEWS-data review as a professional standard for doctors.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 28 December 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present evidence of completed actions to the Whipps Cross Quality and Safety Committee and Trust Quality Assurance Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Key actions in relation to the above are complete and evidence of completion will be presented at the Whipps Cross Quality and Safety Committee and to the Trust Quality Assurance Committee.”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider expanding the orthogeriatric service to provide cover for all frailty fractures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Notwithstanding this, on occasions there are staffing gaps which can stretch the resource more than is intended. These risks are always mitigated as well as is possible and are regularly reviewed. Furthermore, plans to expand the Orthogeriatric”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reinforce regular NEWS-data review as a professional standard for doctors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The senior medical leadership team in the hospital have made it clear to all doctors in the service that regular review of NEWS data is part of professional standards. A review has confirmed that there is enough access to ensure that this happens in each clinical area.”

Source location

Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026