PFD report

Steven Sanders · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Sep 2023•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to adequately mitigate illicit substance use, entry and distribution within SAH
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of illicit substance use and supply in secure institutions
  2. Presence and supply of highly potent synthetic opioids
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Conduct an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering safety, including illicit-drug supply and the concerns raised in the report.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    An urgent unannounced inspection was not considered necessary at that time because the provider needed time to implement actions from its investigation.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to adequately mitigate illicit substance use, entry and distribution within SAH

Wider context from the report

“Initially there was no evidence that illegal drugs were more widely being used and supplied within SAH and the hospital provided evidence of its policies and procedures for searches to address this risk and asserted that these policies and procedures were in appropriate operation. However, on the 24th July 2023 I was informed that during a routine room search of Hurst ward (another secure ward in SAH Birmingham) over the weekend of the 22nd/23rd July 2023 a quantity of drugs and a lighter were discovered in a patient’s room. The patient (Patient A) whose room these items were found in alleged that these drugs were given to him by Mr Steven Sanders when they were both patients on Hawksley ward. SAH has confirmed that the patient and Mr Sanders were cared for on Hawksley ward at the same time prior to Mr Sanders’ death. The following further information was then provided by SAH on the 27th July 2023: the room search occurred on 23rd July, ████████ found in Patient A’s room, Patient A disclosed the substance ████████ from Mr Sanders on the day he died (20th November 2022) after Mr Sanders returned from unescorted leave, Patient A got ████████ from another patient, Patient B, whilst on Hawksley Ward. Patient A also disclosed that Patient B had brought ████████ into Hawksley Ward. Subsequently, on the 24th July 2023 Patient A was found with what appeared to be cocaine in his room and he had hidden it in his anus during the room search on the 23rd July. I wrote to the CQC and WMP on the 28th July 2023 explaining my concerns. I have not yet received any update on the action taken to date by the CQC. It was agreed at a meeting with WMP on the 11th August 2023 that they would conduct some enquiries, but I have not had any update on those enquiries. Today I have become aware that on the 24th September 2023 a report was made to West Midlands Police that a patient had been supplying drugs to other patients. The details were that he had been keeping ████████. Three patients had tested positive for ████████ and a further 5 patients were acting under influence. Also, on the 24th September 2023 another detained patient (Patient C) was found deceased lying on his bed in unexplained and unexpected circumstances. A separate investigation is being undertaken into Patient C’s death and it remains to be ascertained whether his death was drug related. I am deeply concerned that the risk of illicit substance use is not being adequately mitigated at SAH and there is an endemic problem. This risk creates an obvious risk to life not merely from the risk of death inherent in illicit substance use but also because the population of SAH is particularly vulnerable: many suffer from mental illness affecting their judgement and assessment of risk, there will be a history of drug use amongst many patients and those patients taking illicit substances may not have an accurate perception of their tolerance due to their time in detention. The risk of death is also increased by the current presence of ████████ (new and highly potent synthetic opioids) ████████ being supplied within the West Midlands. There needs to be an urgent and thorough investigation into all these incidents to identify how drugs are entering and being distributed within SAH and how this risk can be mitigated as far as possible in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of illicit substance use and supply in secure institutions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Presence and supply of highly potent synthetic opioids

Wider context from the report

“Initially there was no evidence that illegal drugs were more widely being used and supplied within SAH and the hospital provided evidence of its policies and procedures for searches to address this risk and asserted that these policies and procedures were in appropriate operation. However, on the 24th July 2023 I was informed that during a routine room search of Hurst ward (another secure ward in SAH Birmingham) over the weekend of the 22nd/23rd July 2023 a quantity of drugs and a lighter were discovered in a patient’s room. The patient (Patient A) whose room these items were found in alleged that these drugs were given to him by Mr Steven Sanders when they were both patients on Hawksley ward. SAH has confirmed that the patient and Mr Sanders were cared for on Hawksley ward at the same time prior to Mr Sanders’ death. The following further information was then provided by SAH on the 27th July 2023: the room search occurred on 23rd July, ████████ found in Patient A’s room, Patient A disclosed the substance ████████ from Mr Sanders on the day he died (20th November 2022) after Mr Sanders returned from unescorted leave, Patient A got ████████ from another patient, Patient B, whilst on Hawksley Ward. Patient A also disclosed that Patient B had brought ████████ into Hawksley Ward. Subsequently, on the 24th July 2023 Patient A was found with what appeared to be cocaine in his room and he had hidden it in his anus during the room search on the 23rd July. I wrote to the CQC and WMP on the 28th July 2023 explaining my concerns. I have not yet received any update on the action taken to date by the CQC. It was agreed at a meeting with WMP on the 11th August 2023 that they would conduct some enquiries, but I have not had any update on those enquiries. Today I have become aware that on the 24th September 2023 a report was made to West Midlands Police that a patient had been supplying drugs to other patients. The details were that he had been keeping ████████. Three patients had tested positive for ████████ and a further 5 patients were acting under influence. Also, on the 24th September 2023 another detained patient (Patient C) was found deceased lying on his bed in unexplained and unexpected circumstances. A separate investigation is being undertaken into Patient C’s death and it remains to be ascertained whether his death was drug related. I am deeply concerned that the risk of illicit substance use is not being adequately mitigated at SAH and there is an endemic problem. This risk creates an obvious risk to life not merely from the risk of death inherent in illicit substance use but also because the population of SAH is particularly vulnerable: many suffer from mental illness affecting their judgement and assessment of risk, there will be a history of drug use amongst many patients and those patients taking illicit substances may not have an accurate perception of their tolerance due to their time in detention. The risk of death is also increased by the current presence of ████████ (new and highly potent synthetic opioids) ████████ being supplied within the West Midlands. There needs to be an urgent and thorough investigation into all these incidents to identify how drugs are entering and being distributed within SAH and how this risk can be mitigated as far as possible in the future. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering safety, including illicit-drug supply and the concerns raised in the report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“○ CQC undertook an unannounced, comprehensive inspection of the service in January 2024. The inspection focussed on all five key questions which are safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led and specifically included consideration of the concerns expressed in your report about illicit drug supply.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 6 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

An urgent unannounced inspection was not considered necessary at that time because the provider needed time to implement actions from its investigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“○ Following a management review meeting in which we considered all the relevant information including a review of the action plan submitted by the provider and their implementation of ward lockdowns, we concluded that an urgent unannounced inspection would not take place at that time. We determined that it was proportionate to give the provider time to implement the action identified following their own urgent investigation. This position however remained under continuous review. SAH provided CQC with weekly reports, which included actions they were taking to prevent the supply of illicit drugs, additional staff training, review of security protocols, risk assessments and care plans, alongside joint work with local substance misuse services.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 5 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The registered provider is primarily responsible for developing and implementing policies and processes that meet applicable safety duties and standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While the essential standards contained in RAR 2014 set out the relevant standards that registered providers must meet, they do not prescribe how exactly and what precisely registered providers must do to meet them; those are things that the registered provider must determine in order to meet the standards and duties set out in Act, RAR 2014 and RR 2009. It is the primary responsibility of a registered provider such as SAH to develop and implement adequate policy and process to ensure that those duties, responsibilities, and standards are met. To assist providers, CQC have published details of our key lines of enquiry and rating characteristics and guidance for providers on meeting the regulations.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 2 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Request that the Chief Coroner’s Office disseminate instructions to coroners about notifying CQC of relevant inquests and sending Regulation 28 reports through the designated inbox.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2023.
  2. 2

    Develop and improve internal processes and operational guidance for systematic handling of coronial correspondence.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2023.
  3. 3

    Conduct a formal annual regulatory review of the provider and assess whether further regulatory activity is required.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2023.
  4. 4

    Continue monitoring provider implementation of actions through ongoing engagement and service inspection, and review further information received or gathered.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 October 2023.
  5. 5

    Operate a dedicated inbox process to catalogue, categorise, analyse and distribute coronial correspondence to responsible operational colleagues.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2023.
  6. 6

    Publish the comprehensive inspection report on the CQC website.

    Stated by Care Quality CommissionStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 October 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request that the Chief Coroner’s Office disseminate instructions to coroners about notifying CQC of relevant inquests and sending Regulation 28 reports through the designated inbox.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A key feature of those internal processes and products designed to support systematic and robust handling of coronial correspondence is the dedicated email inbox set up to receive, record and distribute all coronial correspondence. In response to your regulation 28 report the CQC asked of the Chief Coroner’s Office that messaging was sent to all coroners to request that:”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 8 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and improve internal processes and operational guidance for systematic handling of coronial correspondence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• To support the robust and systematic handling of coronial correspondence CQC has developed and improved clear and well-messaged internal processes and operational guidance products. Those processes and products signpost, and are based upon, the MoU with the Coroners Society which CQC understands to be in operation.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 7 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a formal annual regulatory review of the provider and assess whether further regulatory activity is required.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Considering the service had not been inspected since June 2018, an inspector carried out a formal annual regulatory review with the provider on 23 June 2022 and concluded no further regulatory activity was required at that time. Before receipt of your Regulation 28 report, and in line with its published inspection priorities CQC had already identified SAH Birmingham for a comprehensive inspection alongside other services that have not been inspected and rated for 5 years or more.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 4 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring provider implementation of actions through ongoing engagement and service inspection, and review further information received or gathered.

Verbatim wording from the response

“○ An inspector reviewed the notification submitted by the provider in relation to the death of patient C in line with our processes. The CQC requested and reviewed a 72-hour report from the provider, and the Initial Management Review, Serious Incidents and Deaths report that was received on 3 October 2024. CQC found that immediate actions had been taken by the provider and the CQC also concluded that there were not reasonable grounds to suspect an offence under Regulations 12(1) and 22(2) RAR 2014. The CQC did and will continue to monitor the extent to which appropriate actions have been implemented by the provider as part of on-going engagement and during the inspection of the service. The CQC will also review any further or new information that it receives or gathers.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 5 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate a dedicated inbox process to catalogue, categorise, analyse and distribute coronial correspondence to responsible operational colleagues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“For example, the dedicated inbox that is referenced at paragraphs 31, 34 and 35 of the MoU (CQCInquestsandCoroners1@cqc.org.uk) represents a key component of those processes: a team is responsible for overseeing that dedicated inbox and is required to catalogue, categorise and analyse all coronial correspondence that arrives into the inbox; it is then required to promptly and reliably distribute that correspondence in accordance with the relevant category and associated established process to designated operational colleagues for appropriate consideration and timely response.”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 7 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the comprehensive inspection report on the CQC website.

Verbatim wording from the response

“○ A copy of the inspection report is published on the CQC website and can be found here: https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-121538294”

Source location

Response from Care Quality Commission
Page 7 · response
Published 5 October 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026