PFD report

ANNABEL NEWPORT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Jul 2019•London Inner (South)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of consistent provision of defibrillators on trains and at stations
  2. Failure of the Pass-Com alarm to remain available after activation without guard reset
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of emergency alarm responsePart of recurring concern: Unreliable access to emergency communication
  3. Uncertainty about first aid training of drivers and control staff
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Support workplaces to purchase and place defibrillators.

    Stated by British Heart FoundationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 September 2019.
  2. Action

    Encourage train stations and rail network providers to place defibrillators in stations and on trains.

    Stated by British Heart FoundationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 September 2019.
  3. Action

    Update Pass-Com emergency guidance so Drivers advise passengers to use another emergency alarm and Guards are reminded to reset the device.

    Stated by First MTR South Western Trains LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 September 2019.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Position

    Train stations and rail network providers have no legislative obligation to place defibrillators in stations or on trains.

    Stated by British Heart FoundationDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of consistent provision of defibrillators on trains and at stations

Wider context from the report

“(i) The lack of consistent provision of defibrillators on trains and at stations 1. Although out of hospital cardiac arrest carries a generally poor prognosis, for some patients defibrillation can be lifesaving: • The inquest received evidence that London Ambulance Service data suggests that around 32.9% of those with a shockable heart rhythm who receive defibrillation survive. Those figures are based on patients who received defibrillation from the emergency services. It is a reasonable inference that the survival rate will be higher if those who received defibrillation from a member of the public before the arrival of the emergency services are included in the data. • The European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation (2010) suggest that in some cases CPR can double the chances of survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest. Early defibrillation is one of the four key stages of the “Chain of Survival” alongside early recognition of the problem, calling 999 and CPR.¹ 2. The inquest received evidence that Eurostar International provides defibrillators on its trains and Virgin Trains has them on at least its ‘Pendolino’ trains. 3. There is a concern that South Western Railway does not provide defibrillators on any of its trains or at any of its stations, other than 12 chosen stations in the area it serves, across Kent, Sussex and in London. Other Train Operating Companies may adopt similar policies in this respect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Pass-Com alarm to remain available after activation without guard reset

Wider context from the report

“(iii) The operation of the Pass-Com emergency alarm system 7. The Pass-Com is the emergency passenger alarm system found in the South Western Railway train carriages. It is understood that this may feature on other Train Operating Companies’ trains. Due to the operation of the alarm if it is activated by the passenger, once the call is terminated by the driver the alarm cannot be used again until the guard has re-set it. 8. In this case, the guard could not be located and so the alarm could not be used. Accordingly, a passenger took it upon himself to walk through the train to alert the driver to Ms Newport’s condition and lost potentially valuable time in order to do so. This may have contributed to the delay in her receiving ambulance treatment. The passenger did not appear to have realised that he could use a Pass-Com in another carriage. This may have been due to the stressful situation he found himself in, which is quite likely to occur if someone has used the Pass-Com due to a medical emergency. 9. There is a concern that it is not sufficiently apparent to passengers that once the Pass-Com has been used once, it cannot be used again without being re-set by the guard, and that in those circumstances they should immediately go to the next carriage to use the one there. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency alarm response; Unreliable access to emergency communication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Uncertainty about first aid training of drivers and control staff

Wider context from the report

“(ii) First aid awareness among the South Western Railway train guards and other staff 4. South Western Railway train guards are not first aid trained, although under its “Caring for Customers – What to do when a person is taken ill on a train” Protocol, it is the guard who is primarily responsible for identifying whether an unwell passenger’s condition is “life-threatening”. 5. It is also not clear whether South Western Railway drivers and control staff are first aid trained. In this case, the driver knew that Ms Newport had collapsed and was unconscious. There was communication about her between him and the control staff. The control staff decided that the train would proceed to Waterloo, leading to a delay in Ms Newport in her receiving ambulance treatment. This was on the basis that it was not understood that her condition was life-threatening. 6. There is a concern that a lack of first aid training of the driver and/or the control staff may have led to a failure to recognise that being unconscious is a potentially life-threatening condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficiently clear passenger information about Pass-Com reuse and use of the next carriage alarm

Wider context from the report

“(iii) The operation of the Pass-Com emergency alarm system 7. The Pass-Com is the emergency passenger alarm system found in the South Western Railway train carriages. It is understood that this may feature on other Train Operating Companies’ trains. Due to the operation of the alarm if it is activated by the passenger, once the call is terminated by the driver the alarm cannot be used again until the guard has re-set it. 8. In this case, the guard could not be located and so the alarm could not be used. Accordingly, a passenger took it upon himself to walk through the train to alert the driver to Ms Newport’s condition and lost potentially valuable time in order to do so. This may have contributed to the delay in her receiving ambulance treatment. The passenger did not appear to have realised that he could use a Pass-Com in another carriage. This may have been due to the stressful situation he found himself in, which is quite likely to occur if someone has used the Pass-Com due to a medical emergency. 9. There is a concern that it is not sufficiently apparent to passengers that once the Pass-Com has been used once, it cannot be used again without being re-set by the guard, and that in those circumstances they should immediately go to the next carriage to use the one there. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of first aid training for train guards responsible for identifying life-threatening conditions

Wider context from the report

“(ii) First aid awareness among the South Western Railway train guards and other staff 4. South Western Railway train guards are not first aid trained, although under its “Caring for Customers – What to do when a person is taken ill on a train” Protocol, it is the guard who is primarily responsible for identifying whether an unwell passenger’s condition is “life-threatening”. 5. It is also not clear whether South Western Railway drivers and control staff are first aid trained. In this case, the driver knew that Ms Newport had collapsed and was unconscious. There was communication about her between him and the control staff. The control staff decided that the train would proceed to Waterloo, leading to a delay in Ms Newport in her receiving ambulance treatment. This was on the basis that it was not understood that her condition was life-threatening. 6. There is a concern that a lack of first aid training of the driver and/or the control staff may have led to a failure to recognise that being unconscious is a potentially life-threatening condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support workplaces to purchase and place defibrillators.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We also support workplaces to purchase defibrillators – for example we have recently supported a national construction company to purchase over 300 defibrillators that will be placed within the new housing estates they are developing.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-British-Heart-Foundation
Page 1 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Encourage train stations and rail network providers to place defibrillators in stations and on trains.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While there is no legislative onus on train stations and rail network providers to place defibrillators within train stations and on trains, we do encourage those relevant organisations to do so and can support them as I outlined above.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-British-Heart-Foundation
Page 1 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update Pass-Com emergency guidance so Drivers advise passengers to use another emergency alarm and Guards are reminded to reset the device.

Verbatim wording from the response

“37 The Coroner suggested we might put signage next to the Pass-Com. However, our concern is that this might not be read by a passenger under the pressure of acting in an unexpected emergency. We think that the best way to address that concern is for Drivers, receiving a Pass-Com communication, to advise the passenger about this limitation. We have therefore updated the Driver’s section of the Booklet to reflect this. In particular, the start of the Driver’s step-by-step guide to responding to an ill passenger incident begins [emphasis added]:”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 6 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Distribute and embed the revised protocol through Guard and Driver access, Guard briefings, Development Days, Guard cue cards, and Control Centre prompt cards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(a) Each Guard will be issued with, and will have to sign for, a hard copy of the Booklet for their use;”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 6 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a revised passenger-illness protocol booklet incorporating explicit life-threatening conditions, worst-case response guidance, and basic lifesaving and first-aid guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“30 As noted during the Inquest, SWR had been preparing to revise the booklet containing our written protocol for dealing with passenger illness incidents, including cardiac arrest. SWR awaited the outcome of the Inquest so as to incorporate learning from it. We have since published a revised version of that protocol, incorporating a number of changes and improvements, in a booklet called “Caring for our Customers”.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 5 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review AED provision at managed stations and determine additional installation locations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“12. SWR has commenced a systematic and detailed review of the locations at which AEDs are installed at its managed stations. SWR anticipates this will result in the installation of AEDs at additional locations. It has not yet finalised the list of locations. We have also recently been approached by Network Rail to discuss a wider initiative which Network Rail is spearheading concerning further installations at stations on the national rail network. I am therefore positive there will be an increase in AEDs at our stations in the near future. Since the incident, in addition to the dedicated paramedic”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 2 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train stations and rail network providers have no legislative obligation to place defibrillators in stations or on trains.

Verbatim wording from the response

“While there is no legislative onus on train stations and rail network providers to place defibrillators within train stations and on trains, we do encourage those relevant organisations to do so and can support them as I outlined above.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-British-Heart-Foundation
Page 1 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

On-board AEDs are not required because frequent stops and ambulance-service equipment provide the appropriate emergency response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“8. Much of SWR’s core business is the operation of suburban Metro-style services in and around London. These services run between Waterloo and Clapham Junction where they split into separate routes. These are frequent services with many interim stops, as well as further ‘through’ stations at which a train could stop in an emergency. For example, the peak-time 08:42 service from Reading to Waterloo is an 82-minute journey stopping at 18 stations, which is an average of one stop every 4½ minutes.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 2 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Additional Pass-Com signage is unnecessary because Drivers now advise passengers to use another emergency alarm for further contact.

Verbatim wording from the response

“36 We understand your concern is that it is not sufficiently apparent to passengers that once the Pass-Com has been used once, it cannot be used again without being reset by the Guard but that in those circumstances, they can immediately go to the next carriage to use the one there.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 6 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Additional first-aid training would not improve Driver or Control Centre responses because their roles require communication and ambulance coordination.

Verbatim wording from the response

“16. Having given proper consideration to the concern raised, it is not clear in what circumstances first aid training of Drivers and staff at the Control Centre would make a difference to the treatment of an on-board passenger. We would certainly never dissuade an employee in either role from taking a first aid course. However, in respect of passenger emergency responses, neither is in a position to administer first aid.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 3 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Develop and roll out The Circuit national defibrillator database across UK ambulance services.

    Stated by British Heart FoundationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 September 2019.
  2. 2

    Support community groups to place defibrillators in local areas.

    Stated by British Heart FoundationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 September 2019.
  3. 3

    Provide CPR kits to secondary schools so pupils learn lifesaving skills.

    Stated by British Heart FoundationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 September 2019.
  4. 4

    Support a construction company to purchase over 300 defibrillators for new housing estates.

    Stated by British Heart FoundationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 September 2019.
  5. 5

    Invest in and deliver CPR training through the Nation of Lifesavers programme.

    Stated by British Heart FoundationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 September 2019.
  6. 6

    Base paramedics at London Waterloo during weekday morning peak periods.

    Stated by First MTR South Western Trains LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 September 2019.
  7. 7

    Issue Guards a bulletin addressing situations in which the Guard cannot hear or respond to a Pass-Com activation.

    Stated by First MTR South Western Trains LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 September 2019.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.3

  1. 1

    The Control Centre was told only that the passenger had collapsed, not that she was unconscious.

    Stated by First MTR South Western Trains LimitedDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  2. 2

    Guards should prioritise Control Centre and ambulance contact over first aid because delay could reduce opportunities for timely train diversion.

    Stated by First MTR South Western Trains LimitedExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  3. 3

    A reported collapse should not automatically be treated as life-threatening because unnecessary diversions can disrupt the network and endanger passengers.

    Stated by First MTR South Western Trains LimitedDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and roll out The Circuit national defibrillator database across UK ambulance services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Each year we support an average of 362 community groups to place a defibrillator in their local areas to increase access to defibrillators during an emergency. We are currently investing over £4.5m in the development and roll-out of a national database, known as ‘The Circuit: the national defibrillator network’, which will be connected to every ambulance service in the UK. This will allow the emergency medical dispatcher to direct a bystander to the nearest defibrillator at the time of an OHCA. The Circuit is now live in the West Midlands and Scottish ambulance service and we are actively preparing for the roll-out to the remaining 12 services in the UK.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-British-Heart-Foundation
Page 1 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support community groups to place defibrillators in local areas.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Each year we support an average of 362 community groups to place a defibrillator in their local areas to increase access to defibrillators during an emergency. We are currently investing over £4.5m in the development and roll-out of a national database, known as ‘The Circuit: the national defibrillator network’, which will be connected to every ambulance service in the UK. This will allow the emergency medical dispatcher to direct a bystander to the nearest defibrillator at the time of an OHCA. The Circuit is now live in the West Midlands and Scottish ambulance service and we are actively preparing for the roll-out to the remaining 12 services in the UK.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-British-Heart-Foundation
Page 1 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide CPR kits to secondary schools so pupils learn lifesaving skills.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Improving survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a strategic priority for the British Heart Foundation. We have invested over £7m in our ‘Nation of Lifesavers’ programme over the last 5 years which has resulted in over 5.5m people being trained in CPR. Over 85% of secondary schools across the UK are using BHF funded CPR kit to ensure that the majority of young people will leave school knowing how to save a life. I am proud to say that we have achieved this thanks to the generous support of our donors who come from all walks of life.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-British-Heart-Foundation
Page 1 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support a construction company to purchase over 300 defibrillators for new housing estates.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We also support workplaces to purchase defibrillators – for example we have recently supported a national construction company to purchase over 300 defibrillators that will be placed within the new housing estates they are developing.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-British-Heart-Foundation
Page 1 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Invest in and deliver CPR training through the Nation of Lifesavers programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Improving survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a strategic priority for the British Heart Foundation. We have invested over £7m in our ‘Nation of Lifesavers’ programme over the last 5 years which has resulted in over 5.5m people being trained in CPR. Over 85% of secondary schools across the UK are using BHF funded CPR kit to ensure that the majority of young people will leave school knowing how to save a life. I am proud to say that we have achieved this thanks to the generous support of our donors who come from all walks of life.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-British-Heart-Foundation
Page 1 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Base paramedics at London Waterloo during weekday morning peak periods.

Verbatim wording from the response

“presence at Wimbledon and Clapham Junction stations, paramedics are now also based at London Waterloo in the morning peak, Monday to Friday only.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 3 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue Guards a bulletin addressing situations in which the Guard cannot hear or respond to a Pass-Com activation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“22. This incident was highly unusual because the Guard was in a part of the train where he was uncontactable and was not aware of the unfolding situation. Following the incident, a bulletin was issued to Guards to address that situation. No similar situation has been encountered since that briefing was issued. In normal circumstances, the Guard would be in a position to update the Control Centre as the situation developed, for example if what initially appeared to be a ‘collapse’ was later recognised to be something more serious. Instances where information would be conveyed by any other route will be rare.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 4 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Control Centre was told only that the passenger had collapsed, not that she was unconscious.

Verbatim wording from the response

“14. It should be noted that the PFD Report contains a factual inaccuracy central to part of the concern expressed. The Report proceeds on the basis that the Driver told the Control Centre that Ms Newport was “unconscious” and that there was a failure to recognise “being unconscious [as] a potentially life-threatening condition”. However, the evidence before the Coroner from recorded call transcripts and witnesses was that a passenger attending Ms Newport told the Driver that she had collapsed and was unconscious. This was the information relayed from the Driver to the signal box. The signal box then told the Control Centre that there was “a collapsed passenger on board”.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 3 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Guards should prioritise Control Centre and ambulance contact over first aid because delay could reduce opportunities for timely train diversion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“25 When a Guard responds to an ill passenger incident, our protocol requires them to make an initial assessment of what is happening and the passenger’s condition. If the passenger’s condition appears to require medical attention, the Guard must call the Ill Passenger Emergency number and follow the process outlined above. This process is designed to ensure that the right Ambulance Service is informed as quickly as possible and that a decision on where to stop the train can be made.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 5 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A reported collapse should not automatically be treated as life-threatening because unnecessary diversions can disrupt the network and endanger passengers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“20. As noted above, the Control Staff were told that Ms Newport had “collapsed”. Evidence was provided to the Inquest as to why it would not be practicable, and in fact could be potentially dangerous, for the Control Centre to assume that a report of a collapse, without more, should be treated as life-threatening. A number of reasons were provided to the Coroner. I have briefly revisited a few of the key reasons below. I have also detailed a change we have made to our protocol for such situations.”

Source location

2019-0240-Response-by-South-Western-Railways
Page 4 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026