Mr Yusuf Seyit · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Apr 2021•Inner South London

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to initiate antibiotic treatment promptly for suspected fatal infection
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely antibiotic treatment for suspected or confirmed infection
  2. Failure to confirm and record timely administration of Amikacin
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe medication administration

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

    Re-audit sepsis performance against Sepsis 6 standards and address identified practice gaps through governance monitoring.

  2. Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

    Remind clinical staff to administer prescribed critical medications within one hour and reinforce this through ward and team meetings.

  3. Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

    Share learning from the incident through Trust, divisional and junior doctors’ mortality and morbidity review meetings.

  4. Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

    Ensure all wards are stocked with paper Sepsis Assessment Bundles.

  5. Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

    Implement the electronic iCare Sepsis Bundle across the Trust.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust

    The Trust states antibiotics were administered within an hour, disputing that Amikacin administration timing was unconfirmed or late.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to initiate antibiotic treatment promptly for suspected fatal infection

Wider context from the report

“1. He was known to be at high risk of fatal infection and had developed symptoms 2 days before death and definitive proof of infection by the late afternoon of 2nd July, but it was not clear whether there was a plan for antibiotic intervention and no treatment was begun that day. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely antibiotic treatment for suspected or confirmed infection.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to confirm and record timely administration of Amikacin

Wider context from the report

“2. When in septic shock in the early hours of 3rd, three antibiotics were prescribed and our initial death report indicated treatment had begun before he died. But the medical records available to the inquest did not confirm when Amikacin was actually administered. Evidence of a consultant physician was that it needed to be within an hour. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Re-audit sepsis performance against Sepsis 6 standards and address identified practice gaps through governance monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The Trust and Division have re-audited sepsis performance on all clinical wards against the Sepsis 6 Bundle Standards and actions have been taken to improve gaps in practice. This will be monitored through our internal governance processes.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind clinical staff to administer prescribed critical medications within one hour and reinforce this through ward and team meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The Trust will ensure that all wards are adequately stocked with the paper version of the Sepsis Assessment Bundle, and all clinical staff have been reminded that prescribed critical medications are to be administered to patients within an hour of being prescribed by a doctor. This is discussed at Ward Safety huddles and local team meetings.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from the incident through Trust, divisional and junior doctors’ mortality and morbidity review meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to assure you that the Trust has taken the concerns raised seriously and learning from this incident has been shared at the Trust Mortality Review Committee, Divisional Mortality and Morbidity and the Junior Doctors review meetings.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure all wards are stocked with paper Sepsis Assessment Bundles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The Trust will ensure that all wards are adequately stocked with the paper version of the Sepsis Assessment Bundle, and all clinical staff have been reminded that prescribed critical medications are to be administered to patients within an hour of being prescribed by a doctor. This is discussed at Ward Safety huddles and local team meetings.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the electronic iCare Sepsis Bundle across the Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The Trust is prioritising the implementation of an electronic (iCare) Sepsis Bundle. This was originally scheduled for 2022. Discussion has taken place with the Trust IT department and there are plans for this to be completed later this year. This will be monitored via Divisional Governance processes and assurance given via the Trust Quality and Safety Committee.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust states antibiotics were administered within an hour, disputing that Amikacin administration timing was unconfirmed or late.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. When in septic shock in the early hours of 3rd July 2020, three antibiotics were prescribed, and the Trust initial death report indicated treatment had commenced before he died. However, the medical records available to the inquest did not confirm when Amikacin was actually administered. Evidence provided by a consultant physician confirmed that it needed to be within an hour.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026