PFD report

Mr Yusuf Seyit · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Apr 2021•Inner South London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to initiate antibiotic treatment promptly for suspected fatal infection
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely antibiotic treatment for suspected or confirmed infection
  2. Failure to confirm and record timely administration of Amikacin
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe medication administration
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Re-audit sepsis performance against Sepsis 6 standards and address identified practice gaps through governance monitoring.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 April 2021.
  2. Action

    Remind clinical staff to administer prescribed critical medications within one hour and reinforce this through ward and team meetings.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 April 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The Trust states antibiotics were administered within an hour, disputing that Amikacin administration timing was unconfirmed or late.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to initiate antibiotic treatment promptly for suspected fatal infection

Wider context from the report

“1. He was known to be at high risk of fatal infection and had developed symptoms 2 days before death and definitive proof of infection by the late afternoon of 2nd July, but it was not clear whether there was a plan for antibiotic intervention and no treatment was begun that day. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely antibiotic treatment for suspected or confirmed infection.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to confirm and record timely administration of Amikacin

Wider context from the report

“2. When in septic shock in the early hours of 3rd, three antibiotics were prescribed and our initial death report indicated treatment had begun before he died. But the medical records available to the inquest did not confirm when Amikacin was actually administered. Evidence of a consultant physician was that it needed to be within an hour. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication administration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Re-audit sepsis performance against Sepsis 6 standards and address identified practice gaps through governance monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The Trust and Division have re-audited sepsis performance on all clinical wards against the Sepsis 6 Bundle Standards and actions have been taken to improve gaps in practice. This will be monitored through our internal governance processes.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind clinical staff to administer prescribed critical medications within one hour and reinforce this through ward and team meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The Trust will ensure that all wards are adequately stocked with the paper version of the Sepsis Assessment Bundle, and all clinical staff have been reminded that prescribed critical medications are to be administered to patients within an hour of being prescribed by a doctor. This is discussed at Ward Safety huddles and local team meetings.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust states antibiotics were administered within an hour, disputing that Amikacin administration timing was unconfirmed or late.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. When in septic shock in the early hours of 3rd July 2020, three antibiotics were prescribed, and the Trust initial death report indicated treatment had commenced before he died. However, the medical records available to the inquest did not confirm when Amikacin was actually administered. Evidence provided by a consultant physician confirmed that it needed to be within an hour.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 1 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Share learning from the incident through Trust, divisional and junior doctors’ mortality and morbidity review meetings.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 April 2021.
  2. 2

    Ensure all wards are stocked with paper Sepsis Assessment Bundles.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 April 2021.
  3. 3

    Implement the electronic iCare Sepsis Bundle across the Trust.

    Stated by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 April 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share learning from the incident through Trust, divisional and junior doctors’ mortality and morbidity review meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to assure you that the Trust has taken the concerns raised seriously and learning from this incident has been shared at the Trust Mortality Review Committee, Divisional Mortality and Morbidity and the Junior Doctors review meetings.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure all wards are stocked with paper Sepsis Assessment Bundles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The Trust will ensure that all wards are adequately stocked with the paper version of the Sepsis Assessment Bundle, and all clinical staff have been reminded that prescribed critical medications are to be administered to patients within an hour of being prescribed by a doctor. This is discussed at Ward Safety huddles and local team meetings.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the electronic iCare Sepsis Bundle across the Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The Trust is prioritising the implementation of an electronic (iCare) Sepsis Bundle. This was originally scheduled for 2022. Discussion has taken place with the Trust IT department and there are plans for this to be completed later this year. This will be monitored via Divisional Governance processes and assurance given via the Trust Quality and Safety Committee.”

Source location

2021-0111-Response-from-University-Hospital-Lewisham-Published
Page 2 · response
Published 16 April 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026