PFD report

Hollie Anne RICHARDSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Jun 2022•Bedfordshire and Luton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to inform patients with Protein S deficiency about factors that may exacerbate thromboembolism risk
  2. Failure to periodically review patients with Protein S deficiency for changing thromboembolism risk
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform patients with Protein S deficiency about factors that may exacerbate thromboembolism risk

Wider context from the report

“I heard expert evidence during the course of the Inquest relating to the management ( or lack of) following Hollie's diagnosis of being heterozygous for Protein S deficiency. My expert told me in written evidence that "There was no indication for Hollie to be reviewed periodically as the advice not to receive anticoagulant medication would not have changed unless she had a thrombotic event. If she had a thrombosis then she should have been reviewed by a haematologist to consider long term anticoagulation". The difficulty with this is that the expert acknowledged that other life events may alter the risk of thromboembolism. In Hollie's case, there was a very strong family history of protein S deficiency and of some of those suffering from blood clots including fatalities. In addition, Hollie was considerably overweight and seemingly was unaware of the increased burden of thromboembolic events this conferred on her. Counsel for Hollie's family, correctly in my view, pointed to a lacuna in the management of protein S deficiency where patients were given the diagnosis but had no reasonable knowledge of what might exacerbate this risk (because they are not told or under surveillance) so they were blind to actions that they may take to mitigate the risk. That places the responsibility for management of other risk factors squarely with the patient, who might well be ignorant of them, rendering such a position potentially hazardous. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to periodically review patients with Protein S deficiency for changing thromboembolism risk

Wider context from the report

“I heard expert evidence during the course of the Inquest relating to the management ( or lack of) following Hollie's diagnosis of being heterozygous for Protein S deficiency. My expert told me in written evidence that "There was no indication for Hollie to be reviewed periodically as the advice not to receive anticoagulant medication would not have changed unless she had a thrombotic event. If she had a thrombosis then she should have been reviewed by a haematologist to consider long term anticoagulation". The difficulty with this is that the expert acknowledged that other life events may alter the risk of thromboembolism. In Hollie's case, there was a very strong family history of protein S deficiency and of some of those suffering from blood clots including fatalities. In addition, Hollie was considerably overweight and seemingly was unaware of the increased burden of thromboembolic events this conferred on her. Counsel for Hollie's family, correctly in my view, pointed to a lacuna in the management of protein S deficiency where patients were given the diagnosis but had no reasonable knowledge of what might exacerbate this risk (because they are not told or under surveillance) so they were blind to actions that they may take to mitigate the risk. That places the responsibility for management of other risk factors squarely with the patient, who might well be ignorant of them, rendering such a position potentially hazardous. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.